https://idataresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/ReportIcon-Video-MS.jpg

Surgical Robotics and Navigation Market Analysis, Size, Trends | Global | 2019-2025 | MedSuite | Includes: ENT Surgical Navigation Market, Minimally Invasive Surgery Robotics Systems Market, and 8 more

  • Year: 2019
  • Scope: 2015-2025
  • Region: Australia, China, Europe, India, Japan, United States
  • Pages: 4221
  • Published Date: 04/04/2019
  • Type: MedSuite

Industry Trends

The shift from open cavity procedures to minimally invasive procedures has already occurred within the United States, Australia and Europe. For hospitals to attract top talent, they must be equipped with the latest in high-tech equipment and facilities in order to increase efficiency for the surgeon. Incorporating surgical navigation and robotic systems into operating rooms helps institutions promote themselves as industry leaders. Surgical navigation is a more established technology which has become the standard of care in neurosurgery, with adoption increasing in other segments.

Currently, in the Australian and U.S. surgical robotics markets, particularly the robotic-assisted MIS market, are moving towards further minimizing the invasiveness of surgical procedures. In May 2018, Intuitive Surgical received FDA clearance for their single-port da Vinci SP® Surgical System, which allows surgeons to enter the body through a single incision. Some other robotic companies plan to enter the  single-incision robotic-assisted surgery market in the near future and are currently involved in research and development activities.

 

Report Regional Coverage

Throughout this research series, iData has covered several countries in great detail. Each country may be purchased as a stand-alone report, tailoring the data to your needs. The covered countries are:

  • United States
  • Europe (15 countries including: Germany, France, U.K., Italy, Spain, Benelux (Belgium, Netherlands and Luxembourg), Scandinavia (Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden) Austria, Switzerland and Portugal)
  • Japan
  • India
  • China
  • Australia

 

The Only Medical Device Market Research With:

Procedure Volume Analysis
Unit Sales Growth Analysis
Average Selling Prices
Competitor Shares by Segment & Country
 SKU-Level Research Methods
 The Lowest Acquisition Cost

Highly Detailed Segmentation

While this report suite contains all applicable market data, each of the markets are also available as stand alone MedCore reports. This allows you to get access to only the specific market segment research that you need. You can view all these included reports and segmentation here:

  • Procedure Numbers for Surgical Robotics and Navigation Market – MedPro
  • Neurosurgery Navigation Market – MedCore
  • Spinal Surgical Navigation Market – MedCore
  • ENT Surgical Navigation Market  – MedCore
  • Orthopedic Surgical Navigation Market – MedCore
  • Robotic-Assisted Spinal Surgery Systems Market – MedCore
  • Robotic-Assisted Neurosurgery Systems Market – MedCore
  • Minimally Invasive Surgery Robotics Systems Market – MedCore
  • Robotic Radiosurgery Systems Market – MedCore
  • Vascular Catheter Placement Surgical Robotics Market – MedCore
  • Robotic-Assisted Orthopedic Surgery Market – MedCore

Buying all of these reports together in this suite package will provide you with substantial discounts from the separate prices. Request Pricing to Learn More

Full Segmentation Map for the United States

Data Types Included

  • Unit Sales, Average Selling Prices, Market Value & Growth Trends
  • Procedure Volumes
  • 10 Year Scope and Forecast range
  • Market Drivers & Limiters for Each Segment
  • Competitive Analysis with Market Shares for Each Segment
  • Recent Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Disease Overviews and Demographic Information
  • Company Profiles, Product Portfolios and SWOT for Top Competitors

Surgical Robotics and Navigation Market Share Insights

Intuitive Surgical continues to dominate the United State’s overall surgical robotics and navigation market. However, the competitive landscape in the surgical robotics market has been changing steadily in recent years with a number of mergers and acquisitions and new market entrants. Companies such as Auris Health, Globus Medical, Medrobotics, Procept BioRobotics and TransEnterix entered the market over the last few years. Competition in the surgical robotics market is expected to further intensify over the forecast period, with a number of companies currently involved in research and development activities. Companies such as BrainLab, DePuy Synthes, Titan Medical, Verb Surgical and Zimmer Biomet have stated their plans to enter segments of the surgical robotics market within the next few years. Zimmer Biomet led the robotic-assisted neurosurgery market in 2018 and plans to expand to spine and orthopedic robotic applications within in the near future.

Brainlab leads the surgical navigation systems market in Europe. The company has established itself through brand recognition, particularly in its home market, and is expected to remain a strong competitor. Brainlab’s primary competitor is Medtronic, who is the global market leader in surgical navigation. Inuitive Surgical leads the surgical robotic systems market in Europe. Being the oldest and most established competitor in this space, the company continues to remain a dominant player in the market, with a focus on minimally invasive surgical procedures.

Globally, strong competition is found between Stryker, Medtech, Mazor Robotics, EndoMaster, CMR Surgical, Medicaroid and others.

 

All Companies Analyzed in this Study

  •  Accuray
  • Acclarent
  • Aesculap
  • AOT
  • Auris Health
  • avateramedical® GmbH
  • AVRA Medical
  • Blue Belt Technologies
  • BrainLab
  • Cardan Robotics
  • Catheter Precision
  • ClaroNav
  • CMR Surgical
  • Corindus Vascular Robotics
  • DePuy Synthes
  • EndoMaster
  • ELMED Medical Systems
  • Exactech
  • Fiagon
  • Getinge
  • Globus Medical
  • Hansen Medical
  • IMRIS Deerfield
  • Intellijoint Surgical
  • Intuitive Surgical
  • Invuity
  • JointPoint
  • KAIST Future Medical Robotics Research Center
  • Karl Storz
  • Kinamed
  • Koh Young Technology
  • KUKA
  • MAKO Surgical Corporation
  • Mazor Robotics
  • Medacta
  • Mazor Robotics
  • Medical Surgical Technologies
  • Medicaroid
  • Medrobotics
  • Medtech
  • Medtronic
  • meerecompany
  • Nemaris
  • Memic Innovative Surgery
  • NOVADAQ
  • OMNILife Science
  • OrthAlign
  • OrthoGrid
  • OrthoSensor
  • Procept BioRobotics
  • Renishaw
  • Samsung
  • Scopis Medical
  • Smith & Nephew
  • Stereotaxis
  • Stryker
  • Synaptive Medical
  • THINK Surgical
  • Tinavi Medical Technologies
  • Titan Medical
  • TransEnterix
  • Verb Surgical
  • Virtual Incision
  • XACT Robotics
  • Zap Surgical Systems
  • Ziehm Imaging
  • Zimmer Biomet
  • 7D Surgical

 

Statistics and Procedure Trends

There are currently over 578,375 procedures being performed annually in the U.S. surgical navigation market. This number includes spinal, neurosurgery, ENT (ear, nose, and throat) and orthopedic procedures, such as total knee arthroplasty (TKA), total hip arthroplasty (THA) and partial knee reconstruction procedures. The total number of navigated procedures is projected to grow to reach 718,224 procedures performed by 2025.

In the U.S., neurosurgery procedures are the most frequently performed with surgical navigation, accounting for approximately 43.3% of total navigated cases. Surgical navigation is used during brain tumor removal, brain biopsies, deep brain stimulation (DBS), cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) management, and catheter placement for laser ablation procedures; and is considered as the standard of care for almost all of these procedures. Neurosurgery procedures are projected to remain the most common surgically navigated procedure by 2025.

In Europe, the most common procedure performed is total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A successful TKA procedure requires fixating the prosthesis accurately in all 3 axes so there is smooth tracking of the patella and soft tissue and no notching of the anterior femoral cortex. However, even when the procedure is performed by an experienced surgeon, axis alignment errors greater than 3o can occur up to 20% of the time. Using a navigation system for a TKA procedure has proven to reduce the percent of inaccurate axis alignment. Navigation systems also provide an advantage during TKA revision.

See many more by requesting a free sample report of this analysis.

FREE Sample Report

For a Full Table of Contents From Any of the Country Reports in this Global Series, please Contact iData
One of the the most accurate methods of market research in the medical device industry is to analyze the procedure volumes and trends. Through this study on the surgical robotics and navigation market, iData Research has performed an analysis on the following procedure segments in order to increase the accuracy of our market sizing, and provide you with the volume of procedures over a 10 year range. While the below market segmentation map is representative of the United States, procedure volume data is also provided for the other regions within this complete series.

Procedure Volume Analysis Segments in the United States

LIST OF CHARTS

Chart 1 1: Surgical Navigation System Market by Segment, Europe, 2013 – 2023 3
Chart 1 2: Robotic Assisted Surgery Market by Segment, Europe, 2013 – 2023 3
Chart 1 3: Robotics and Surgical Navigation Market Overview, Europe, 2016 & 2023 4
Chart 4 1: Surgical Navigation System Market by Segment, Europe, 2013 – 2023 120
Chart 4 2: Surgical Navigation System Market Breakdown, Europe, 2016 121
Chart 4 3: Surgical Navigation System Market Breakdown, Europe, 2023 121
Chart 4 4: Growth Rates by Segment, Surgical Navigation System Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 124
Chart 4 5: Leading Competitors, Surgical Navigation System Market, Europe, 2016 130
Chart 5 1: Robotic Assisted Surgery System Market by Segment, Europe, 2013 – 2023 148
Chart 5 2: Robotic Assisted Surgery System Market Breakdown, Europe, 2016 149
Chart 5 3: Robotic Assisted Surgery System Market Breakdown, Europe, 2022 149
Chart 5 4: Growth Rates by Segment, Robotic Assisted Surgery System Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023
 153
Chart 5 5: Leading Competitors, Robotic Assisted Surgery System Market, Europe, 2016 161
Chart 7 1: Total Neurosurgery Navigation System Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 193
Chart 7 2: Leading Competitors, Neurosurgery Navigation System Market, Europe, 2016 205
Chart 8 1: Total Spine Navigation System Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 209
Chart 8 2: Leading Competitors, Spine Navigation System Market, Europe, 2016 220
Chart 9 1: Total ENT Navigation System Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 224
Chart 9 2: Leading Competitors, ENT Navigation System Market, Europe, 2016 234
Chart 10 1: Total Orthopedic Navigation System Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 238
Chart 10 2: Leading Competitors, Orthopedic Navigation System Market, Europe, 2016 249
Chart 11 1: Spine Robotic Assisted Surgery System Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 254
Chart 11 2: Leading Competitors, Spine Robotic Assisted Surgery System Market, Europe, 2016 264
Chart 11 3: Neurosurgery Robotic Assisted Surgery System Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 267
Chart 11 4: Leading Competitors, Neurosurgery Robotic Assisted Surgery System Market, Europe, 2016 278
Chart 11 5 Minimally Invasive Surgery Robotic Device Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 281
Chart 11 6: Leading Competitors, Minimally Invasive Surgery Robotic Device Market, Europe, 2016 291
Chart 11 7 Robotic Radiosurgery Device Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 294
Chart 11 8: Robotic Catheter System Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 305
Chart 11 9: Leading Competitors by Country, Robotic Catheter System Market, Europe, 2016 315
Chart 11 10: Robotic Assisted Orthopedic Surgery Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 318
Chart 11 11: Leading Competitors by Country, Robotic Assisted Orthopedic Surgery Market, Europe, 2016 329

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1 1: Robotics and Surgical Navigation Systems Competitor Market Share Ranking by Segment, Europe, 2016 (1 of 2) 5
Figure 1 2: Robotics and Surgical Navigation Systems Competitor Market Share Ranking by Segment, Europe, 2016 (2 of 2) 6
Figure 1 3: Companies Researched in this Report, Europe, 2016 6
Figure 1 4: Factors Impacting the Robotics and Surgical Navigation Systems Market by Segment, Europe
 7
Figure 1 5: Recent Events in the Robotics and Surgical Navigation Market, Europe, 2012 – 2016 8
Figure 1 6: Robotics and Surgical Navigation Procedures Covered, Europe, 2016 9
Figure 1 6: Robotics and Surgical Navigation Markets Covered, Europe, 2016 (1 of 2) 10
Figure 1 6: Robotics and Surgical Navigation Markets Covered, Europe, 2016 (2 of 2) 11
Figure 1 7: Key Report Updates 12
Figure 1 8: Version History 12
Figure 3 1: Robot-Assisted Neurosurgery Products by Company 39
Figure 3 2: Robot-Assisted Spine Surgery Products by Company 40
Figure 3 3: Robot-Assisted Orthopedic Surgery Products by Company 42
Figure 3 4: Robot-Assisted Radiosurgery Products by Company 44
Figure 3 5: Robot-Assisted Catheter Placement Products by Company 45
Figure 3 6: Neurosurgery Navigation Products by Company 47
Figure 3 7: Spine Navigation Products by Company 48
Figure 3 8: ENT Navigation Products by Company 50
Figure 3 9: Orthopedic Navigation Products by Company 51
Figure 3 10: Class 2 Device Recall Accuray Inc 52
Figure 3 11: Class 2 Device Recall Accuray Inc 52
Figure 3 12: Class 2 Device Recall Accuray Inc 52
Figure 3 13: Class 2 Device Recall Accuray Inc 53
Figure 3 14: Class 2 Device Recall Accuray Inc 53
Figure 3 15: Class 2 Device Recall Accuray Inc 53
Figure 3 16: Class 2 Device Recall Blue Belt Technologies 54
Figure 3 17: Class 2 Device Recall Blue Belt Technologies 54
Figure 3 18: Class 2 Device Recall Blue Belt Technologies 54
Figure 3 19: Class 2 Device Recall Hansen Medical 55
Figure 3 20: Class 2 Device Recall Hansen Medical 55
Figure 3 21: Class 2 Device Recall Hansen Medical 55
Figure 3 22: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 56
Figure 3 23: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 56
Figure 3 24: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 56
Figure 3 25: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 57
Figure 3 26: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 57
Figure 3 27: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 57
Figure 3 28: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 58
Figure 3 29: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 58
Figure 3 30: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 59
Figure 3 31: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 59
Figure 3 32: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 60
Figure 3 33: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 61
Figure 3 34: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 61
Figure 3 35: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 61
Figure 3 36: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 62
Figure 3 37: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 62
Figure 3 38: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 63
Figure 3 39: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 63
Figure 3 40: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 63
Figure 3 41: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 64
Figure 3 42: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 64
Figure 3 43: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 64
Figure 3 44: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 65
Figure 3 45: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 65
Figure 3 46: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 66
Figure 3 47: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 67
Figure 3 48: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 67
Figure 3 49: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 68
Figure 3 50: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 68
Figure 3 51: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 69
Figure 3 52: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 69
Figure 3 53: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 69
Figure 3 54: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 70
Figure 3 55: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 70
Figure 3 56: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 70
Figure 3 57: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 71
Figure 3 58: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 71
Figure 3 59: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 71
Figure 3 60: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 72
Figure 3 61: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 72
Figure 3 62: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 72
Figure 3 63: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 72
Figure 3 64: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 73
Figure 3 65: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 73
Figure 3 66: Class 2 Device Recall Intuitive Surgical 73
Figure 3 67: Class 2 Device Recall MAKO Surgical/Stryker 74
Figure 3 68: Class 2 Device Recall MAKO Surgical/Stryker 74
Figure 3 69: Class 2 Device Recall MAKO Surgical/Stryker 74
Figure 3 70: Class 2 Device Recall MAKO Surgical/Stryker 75
Figure 3 71: Class 2 Device Recall MAKO Surgical/Stryker 75
Figure 3 72: Class 2 Device Recall MAKO Surgical/Stryker 75
Figure 3 73: Class 2 Device Recall OMNIlife Science, Inc 76
Figure 3 74: Class 2 Device Recall OMNIlife Science, Inc 76
Figure 3 75: Class 2 Device Recall OMNIlife Science, Inc 76
Figure 3 76: Class 2 Device Recall OMNIlife Science, Inc 77
Figure 3 77: Class 2 Device Recall OMNIlife Science, Inc 77
Figure 3 78: Class 2 Device Recall Brainlab 78
Figure 3 79: Class 2 Device Recall Brainlab 78
Figure 3 80: Class 2 Device Recall Brainlab AG 78
Figure 3 81: Class 2 Device Recall Brainlab 79
Figure 3 82: Class 2 Device Recall Brainlab AG 79
Figure 3 83: Class 2 Device Recall Brainlab AG 79
Figure 3 84: Class 2 Device Recall Brainlab AG 79
Figure 3 85: Class 2 Device Recall Brainlab 80
Figure 3 86: Class 2 Device Recall Brainlab 80
Figure 3 87: Class 2 Device Recall Brainlab AG 80
Figure 3 88: Class 2 Device Recall Brainlab 80
Figure 3 89: Class 2 Device Recall Brainlab 81
Figure 3 90: Class 2 Device Recall Brainlab 81
Figure 3 91: Class 2 Device Recall Brainlab 81
Figure 3 92: Class 2 Device Recall Brainlab 82
Figure 3 93: Class 2 Device Recall Brainlab 82
Figure 3 94: Class 2 Device Recall Brainlab 82
Figure 3 95: Class 2 Device Recall Brainlab 83
Figure 3 96: Class 2 Device Recall Brainlab 83
Figure 3 97: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic 84
Figure 3 98: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic 84
Figure 3 99: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic 84
Figure 3 100: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic 85
Figure 3 101: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic 85
Figure 3 102: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic 85
Figure 3 103: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic 86
Figure 3 104: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic 86
Figure 3 105: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic 87
Figure 3 106: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic 87
Figure 3 107: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic 88
Figure 3 108: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic 88
Figure 3 109: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic 88
Figure 3 110: Class 2 Device Recall Stryker 89
Figure 3 111: Class 2 Device Recall Stryker 89
Figure 3 112: Endoscopic Evaluation of Late Rectal Injury Following CyberKnife Radiosurgery for Prostate Cancer 91
Figure 3 113: CyberKnife Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Low and Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer 91
Figure 3 114: A Phase II Trial of CyberKnife Stereotactic Radiosurgery to Prostate Tumors 92
Figure 3 115: Study To Establish Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Cyberknife in Patients 92
Figure 3 116: A Phase II Trial of CyberKnife Radiosurgery to Perioptic Tumors 93
Figure 3 117: Evaluation of CyberKnife Stereotactic Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer 93
Figure 3 118: An Effectiveness and Toxicity of CyberKnife Based Radiosurgery for Parkinson Disease 94
Figure 3 119: CyberKnife Stereotactic Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (SAPBI) (CK-SAPBI) 94
Figure 3 120: Safety and Efficacy Study of Five-fraction Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy 95
Figure 3 121: A Study of Pre-Operative Cyberknife in Patients With Potentially Resectable Pancreas Cancer 95
Figure 3 122: Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Soft Tissue Sarcoma 96
Figure 3 123: A Phase II Study of Cyberknife Radiosurgery for Renal Cell Carcinoma 96
Figure 3 124: Safety and Feasibility of Arrhythmia Ablation Using the Amigo Remote Robotic System 97
Figure 3 125: Evaluation of the Amigo Robotic System for Ablation of the Cavo-Tricuspid Isthmus 97
Figure 3 126: Manual vs Amigo SmartTouch Atrial Fibrillation Study (MAST-AF) 98
Figure 3 127: Robotic-Assisted Peripheral Intervention for Peripheral Arterial Disease (RAPID) 99
Figure 3 128: Robotic-Assisted Peripheral Intervention for Peripheral Arterial Disease II (RAPID II) 99
Figure 3 129: Post-Market CorPath Registry on the CorPath 200 System 100
Figure 3 130: Embolization Procedures in the Peripheral Vasculature Using the Magellan™ Robotic System 101
Figure 3 131: Registry of the Magellan Robotic System (ROVER) 101
Figure 3 132: Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes in Robotic-Assisted Inguinal Hernia Repair 102
Figure 3 133: A Retrospective Multicenter Investigation of the Use of the da Vinci® Surgical System 102
Figure 3 134: Cosmesis, Patient Satisfaction and Quality of Life After da Vinci 103
Figure 3 135: Robotic-assisted Versus Laparoscopic Sigmoid Resection 103
Figure 3 136: Prospective Investigation of Robotic Single-port System 104
Figure 3 137: Clinical Outcomes of Knee Replacement 105
Figure 3 138: A Trial Evaluating TKR Compared to BKR Performed Using Stryker's Mako Robot 105
Figure 3 139: Robotic Arm Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty 106
Figure 3 140: Outcomes of Robotic Total Hip Arthroplasty 106
Figure 3 141: Clinical and Economic Comparison of Robot Assisted Versus Manual Knee Replacement
 107
Figure 3 142: Prospective, Observational Registry of Renaissance-guided Spine Surgeries 108
Figure 3 143: Clinical Trial of Minimally Invasive Robotic Spine Surgery 108
Figure 3 144: Robotic vs. Freehand Corrective Surgery for Pediatric Scoliosis (PEDSCOLI) 109
Figure 3 145: ADDRESS - Adult Deformity Robotic vs. Freehand Surgery to Correct Spinal Deformity 109
Figure 3 146: MIS ReFRESH: Robotic vs. Freehand Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgeries 110
Figure 3 147: A Post-Market Clinical Trial for Access and Visualization 111
Figure 3 148: Robotic-assisted Pedicule Screw Placement (ARASS) 112
Figure 3 149: Navigation With X3 vs Non-Navigation With X3 Study 113
Figure 3 150: Computer-Assisted Navigation for Intramedullary Nail Fixation 113
Figure 4 1: IGS Systems Sold by Application, Europe, 2013 – 2023 116
Figure 4 2: Currency Exchange Rate, 2016 117
Figure 4 3: Surgical Navigation System Market by Segment, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (€M) 119
Figure 4 4: Surgical Navigation System Market by Segment, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (US$M) 119
Figure 4 5: Growth Rates by Segment, Surgical Navigation System Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 123
Figure 4 6: Drivers and Limiters, Surgical Navigation System Market, Europe, 2016 126
Figure 4 7: Leading Competitors, Surgical Navigation System Market, Europe, 2016 129
Figure 4 8: SWOT Analysis, Medtronic, 2016 131
Figure 4 9: SWOT Analysis, Brainlab, 2016 132
Figure 4 10: SWOT Analysis, Stryker, 2016 133
Figure 4 11: SWOT Analysis, Intuitive Surgical, 2016 134
Figure 5 1: Robotic Assisted Surgery System Market by Segment, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (€M) 146
Figure 5 2: Robotic Assisted Surgery System Market by Segment, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (US$M) 147
Figure 5 3: Growth Rates by Segment, Robotic Assisted Surgery System Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023
 152
Figure 5 4: Drivers and Limiters, Robotic Assisted Surgery System Market, Europe, 2016 156
Figure 5 5: Leading Competitors, Robotic Assisted Surgery System Market, Europe, 2016 160
Figure 6 1: Neurosurgery Navigation Procedures, Europe, 2013 – 2023 178
Figure 6 2: Spine Navigation Procedures, Europe, 2013 – 2023 179
Figure 6 3: ENT Navigation Procedures, Europe, 2013 – 2023 180
Figure 6 4: Orthopedic Navigation Procedures, Europe, 2013 – 2023 183
Figure 6 5: Neurosurgery Robotics Procedures, Europe, 2013 – 2023 184
Figure 6 6: Spinal Robotics Procedures, Europe, 2013 – 2023 185
Figure 6 7: Minimally Invasive Procedures, Europe, 2013 – 2023 186
Figure 6 8: Radiosurgery Robotics Procedures, Europe, 2013 – 2023 187
Figure 6 9: Robotic Catheter Procedures, Europe, 2013 – 2023 188
Figure 7 1: Total Neurosurgery Navigation System Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 192
Figure 7 2: Units Sold by Country, Total Neurosurgery Navigation System, Europe, 2013 – 2023 194
Figure 7 3: ASP by Country, Total Neurosurgery Navigation System, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (€) 195
Figure 7 4: ASP by Country, Total Neurosurgery Navigation System, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (US$) 196
Figure 7 5: Market Value by Country, Total Neurosurgery Navigation System, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (€M) 197
Figure 7 6: Market Value by Country, Total Neurosurgery Navigation System, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (US$M) 198
Figure 7 7: Drivers and Limiters, Neurosurgery Navigation System Market, Europe, 2016 201
Figure 7 8: Leading Competitors, Neurosurgery Navigation System Market, Europe, 2016 204
Figure 8 1: Total Spine Navigation System Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (US$) 209
Figure 8 2: Units Sold by Country, Total Spine Navigation System, Europe, 2013 – 2023 210
Figure 8 3: ASP by Country, Total Spine Navigation System, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (€) 211
Figure 8 4: ASP by Country, Total Spine Navigation System, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (US$) 212
Figure 8 5: Market Value by Country, Total Spine Navigation System, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (€M) 213
Figure 8 6: Market Value by Country, Total Spine Navigation System, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (US$M) 214
Figure 8 7: Drivers and Limiters, Spine Navigation System Market, Europe, 2016 216
Figure 8 8: Leading Competitors, Spine Navigation System Market, Europe, 2016 219
Figure 9 1: Total ENT Navigation System Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (US$) 223
Figure 9 2: Units Sold by Country, Total ENT Navigation System, Europe, 2013 – 2023 225
Figure 9 3: ASP by Country, Total ENT Navigation System, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (€) 226
Figure 9 4: ASP by Country, Total ENT Navigation System, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (US$) 227
Figure 9 5: Market Value by Country, Total ENT Navigation System, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (€M) 228
Figure 9 6: Market Value by Country, Total ENT Navigation System, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (US$M) 229
Figure 9 7: Drivers and Limiters, ENT Navigation System Market, Europe, 2016 231
Figure 9 8: Leading Competitors, ENT Navigation System Market, Europe, 2016 233
Figure 10 1: Total Orthopedic Navigation System Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (€) 237
Figure 10 2: Units Sold by Country, Total Orthopedic Navigation System, Europe, 2013 – 2023 239
Figure 10 3: ASP by Country, Total Orthopedic Navigation System, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (€) 240
Figure 10 4: ASP by Country, Total Orthopedic Navigation System, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (US$) 241
Figure 10 5: Market Value by Country, Total Orthopedic Navigation System, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (€M) 242
Figure 10 6: Market Value by Country, Total Orthopedic Navigation System, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (US$M) 243
Figure 10 7: Drivers and Limiters, Orthopedic Navigation System Market, Europe, 2016 245
Figure 10 8: Leading Competitors, Orthopedic Navigation System Market, Europe, 2016 248
Figure 11 1: Spine Robotic Assisted Surgery System Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (€) 253
Figure 11 2: Units Sold by Country, Spine Robotic Assisted Surgery System, Europe, 2013 – 2023 255
Figure 11 3: ASP by Country, Spine Robotic Assisted Surgery System, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (€) 256
Figure 11 4: ASP by Country, Spine Robotic Assisted Surgery System, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (US$) 257
Figure 11 5: Market Value by Country, Spine Robotic Assisted Surgery System, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (€M) 258
Figure 11 6: Market Value by Country, Spine Robotic Assisted Surgery System, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (US$M) 259
Figure 11 7: Drivers and Limiters, Spine Robotic Assisted Surgery System Market, Europe, 2016 261
Figure 11 8: Leading Competitors, Spine Robotic Assisted Surgery System Market, Europe, 2016 263
Figure 11 9: Neurosurgery Robotic Assisted Surgery System Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (€) 266
Figure 11 10: Units Sold by Country, Neurosurgery Robotic Assisted Surgery System, Europe, 2013 – 2023 268
Figure 11 11: ASP by Country, Neurosurgery Robotic Assisted Surgery System, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (€) 269
Figure 11 12: ASP by Country, Neurosurgery Robotic Assisted Surgery System, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (US$) 270
Figure 11 13: Market Value by Country, Neurosurgery Robotic Assisted Surgery System, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (€M) 271
Figure 11 14: Market Value by Country, Neurosurgery Robotic Assisted Surgery System, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (US$M) 272
Figure 11 15: Drivers and Limiters, Neurosurgery Robotic Assisted Surgery System Market,  Europe, 2016 274
Figure 11 16: Leading Competitors, Neurosurgery Robotic Assisted Surgery System Market, Europe, 2016 277
Figure 11 17: Minimally Invasive Surgery Robotic Device Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (€) 280
Figure 11 18: Units Sold by Country, Minimally Invasive Surgery Robotic Device Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 282
Figure 11 19: ASP by Country, Minimally Invasive Surgery Robotic Device Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (€) 283
Figure 11 20: ASP by Country, Minimally Invasive Surgery Robotic Device Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (US$) 284
Figure 11 21: Market Value by Country, Minimally Invasive Surgery Robotic Device Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (€M) 285
Figure 11 22: Market Value by Country, Minimally Invasive Surgery Robotic Device Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (US$M) 286
Figure 11 23: Drivers and Limiters, Minimally Invasive Surgery Robotic Device Market, Europe, 2016 288
Figure 11 24: Leading Competitors by Country, Minimally Invasive Surgery Robotic Device Market, Europe, 2016 290
Figure 11 25: Robotic Radiosurgery Device Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 293
Figure 11 26: Units Sold by Country, Robotic Radiosurgery Device Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 295
Figure 11 27: ASP by Country, Robotic Radiosurgery Device Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (€) 296
Figure 11 28: ASP by Country, Robotic Radiosurgery Device Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (US$) 297
Figure 11 29: Market Value by Country, Robotic Radiosurgery Device Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (€M) 298
Figure 11 30: Market Value by Country, Robotic Radiosurgery Device Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (US$M) 299
Figure 11 31: Drivers and Limiters, Robotic Radiosurgery Device Market, Europe, 2016 301
Figure 11 32: Leading Competitors, Robotic Radiosurgery Device Market, Europe, 2016 302
Figure 11 33: Robotic Catheter System Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 304
Figure 11 34: Units Sold by Country, Robotic Catheter System Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 306
Figure 11 35: ASP by Country, Robotic Catheter System Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (€) 307
Figure 11 36: ASP by Country, Robotic Catheter System Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (US$) 308
Figure 11 37: Market Value by Country, Robotic Catheter System Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (€M)
 309
Figure 11 38: Market Value by Country, Robotic Catheter System Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (US$M) 310
Figure 11 39: Drivers and Limiters, Robotic Catheter System Market, Europe, 2016 312
Figure 11 40: Leading Competitors, Robotic Catheter System Market, Europe, 2016 314
Figure 11 41: Robotic Assisted Orthopedic Surgery Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 317
Figure 11 42: Units Sold by Country, Robotic Assisted Orthopedic Surgery Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 319
Figure 11 43: ASP by Country, Robotic Assisted Orthopedic Surgery Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (€)
 320
Figure 11 44: ASP by Country, Robotic Assisted Orthopedic Surgery Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (US$) 321
Figure 11 45: Market Value by Country, Robotic Assisted Orthopedic Surgery Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (€M) 322
Figure 11 46: Market Value by Country, Robotic Assisted Orthopedic Surgery Market, Europe, 2013 – 2023 (US$M) 323
Figure 11 47: Drivers and Limiters, Robotic Assisted Orthopedic Surgery Market, Europe, 2016 326
Figure 11 48: Leading Competitors by Country, Robotic Assisted Orthopedic Surgery Market, Europe, 2016 328
Figure 13 1: Robotic Assisted Surgery Press Release Summary 332
Figure 13 2: Surgical Navigation Press Release Summary 610

iData’s 9-Step Research Methodology

Our reports follow an in-depth 9-step methodology which focuses on the following research systems:

  • Original primary research that consists of the most up-to-date market data
  • Strong foundation of quantitative and qualitative research
  • Focused on the needs and strategic challenges of the industry participants

Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection During this preliminary investigation, all staff members involved in the industry discusses the topic in detail.

Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research The first task of the research team is to prepare for the data collection process: Filing systems and relational databases are developed as needed.

Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design The core of all iData research reports is primary market research. Interviews with industry insiders represent the single most reliable way to obtain accurate, current data about market conditions, trends, threats and opportunities.

Step 4: Performing Primary Research At this stage, interviews are performed using contacts and information acquired in the secondary research phase.

Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates Following the completion of the primary research phase, the collected information must be synthesized into an accurate view of the market status. The most important question is the current state of the market.

Step 6: Market Forecast and Analysis iData Research uses a proprietary method to combine statistical data and opinions of industry experts to forecast future market values.

Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities iData analysts identify in broad terms why some companies are gaining or losing share within a given market segment.

Step 8: Final Review and Market Release An integral part of the iData research methodology is a built-in philosophy of quality control and continuing improvement is integral to the iData philosophy.

Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring iData philosophy of continuous improvement requires that reports and consulting projects be monitored after release for customer feedback and market accuracy.

Click Here to Read More About Our Methodology