| Figure 1‑1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Share Ranking by Segment, U.S., 2023 |
| Figure 1‑2: Companies Researched in This Report |
| Figure 1‑3: Factors Impacting the Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, U.S. (1 of 2) |
| Figure 1‑4: Factors Impacting the Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, U.S. (2 of 2) |
| Figure 1‑5: Recent Events in the Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2020 – 2024 |
| Figure 1‑6: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Procedures Covered |
| Figure 1‑7: Procedure Codes Investigated |
| Figure 1‑8: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Markets Covered |
| Figure 1‑9: Key Report Updates |
| Figure 1‑10: Version History |
| Figure 2‑1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, Worst Case Scenario, U.S., 2020 – 2030 (US$M) |
| Figure 2‑2: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, Base Case Scenario, U.S., 2020 – 2030 (US$M) |
| Figure 2‑3: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, Best Case Scenario, U.S., 2020 – 2030 (US$M) |
| Figure 4‑1: MIS Interbody Devices by Company (1 of 5) |
| Figure 4‑2: MIS Interbody Devices by Company (2 of 5) |
| Figure 4‑3: MIS Interbody Devices by Company (3 of 5) |
| Figure 4‑4: MIS Interbody Devices by Company (4 of 5) |
| Figure 4‑5: MIS Interbody Devices by Company (5 of 5) |
| Figure 4‑6: MIS Pedicle Screw by Company (1 of 2) |
| Figure 4‑7: MIS Pedicle Screw by Company (2 of 2) |
| Figure 4‑8: Spinous Process Fixation Devices by Company |
| Figure 4‑9: Facet Fixation Devices by Company |
| Figure 4‑10: SI Joint Fusion Devices by Company |
| Figure 4‑11: Spine Endoscopes by Company |
| Figure 4‑12: Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery Instrumentation by Company |
| Figure 4‑13: Class 2 Device Recall Catalyft" LS Expandable Interbody System Anterior Standalone Cage |
| Figure 4‑14: Class 2 Device Recall XCORE 2 Ti Core, Static |
| Figure 4‑15: Class 2 Device Recall ALTERA Spacer |
| Figure 4‑16: Class 2 Device Recall Stryker Spine |
| Figure 4‑17: Class 2 Device Recall Concorde Lift Expandable Interbody Device |
| Figure 4‑18: Class 2 Device Recall LineSider Spinal System |
| Figure 4‑19: Class 2 Device Recall Polaris 5.5 Spinal System and Polaris 5.5/Cypher Spinal System |
| Figure 4‑20: Class 2 Device Recall Vital MIS Spinal Fixation system |
| Figure 4‑21: Class 2 Device Recall Pass Tulip pedicle screw |
| Figure 4‑22: Class 2 Device Recall Vital MIS Spinal Fixation system |
| Figure 4‑23: Class 2 Device Recall Zimmer Biomet Vitality Spinal Fixation System |
| Figure 4‑24: MIS-D Versus MIS-TLIF for the Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis |
| Figure 4‑25: Bio2 Vitrium® Cervical Cage in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion |
| Figure 4‑26: Retro-prospective Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of the Stand-alone Cervical Interbody Cage C-CURVE (Peek and Titanium) Manufactured by MEDICREA® (C-CURVE) |
| Figure 4‑27: Prospective Study of Fusion Rates Using Spira-C Device for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery (ACDF) |
| Figure 4‑28: LLIF Plus Posterior Decompression for Severe Lumbar Spinal Stenosis |
| Figure 4‑29: SPIRA™-A 3D and HCT/p DBM vs. Medtronic Divergent™-L/Perimeter™ and Recombinant BMP-2 |
| Figure 4‑30: Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion |
| Figure 4‑31: Pedicle Screw Fixation in Osteoporotic Lumbar Spine (PSFOLS) |
| Figure 4‑32: XLIF Decade Plate System Study |
| Figure 4‑33: Effectiveness and Safety of the Facet Fixation (FFX®) Implant in the Treatment of Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis |
| Figure 4‑34: Safety and Efficacy Assessment of Using the zLOCK Facet Stabilization System |
| Figure 4‑35: Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of the FACET FIXation Implant |
| Figure 4‑36: Percutaneous Screw Fixation vs. Open Fixation in the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures (PrecScrew) |
| Figure 4‑37: iFuse TORQ for the Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Dysfunction |
| Figure 4‑38: Post-Market Feasibility Study of the Tenon Medical CATAMARAN™ SI Joint Fusion System |
| Figure 4‑39: Clinical Outcome and Fusion Results Using the SiJoin® Transfixing Sacroiliac Fusion Device |
| Figure 4‑40: Tenon Medical CATAMARAN™ SI Joint Fusion System CT Scan Study |
| Figure 4‑41: Evolusion Study Using the Zyga SImmetry Sacroiliac Joint Fusion System |
| Figure 4‑42: Treatment of Sacroiliac Dysfunction With SI-LOK® Sacroiliac Joint Fixation SI-SI-LOK |
| Figure 4‑43: The Effect of Mediclore as an Anti-adhesion Agent and Safety in Full-Endoscopic Spine Surgery: a Preliminary Study |
| Figure 4‑44: Fluorescence Imaging with Indocyanine Green (ICG) in Endoscopic Spinal Surgery |
| Figure 5‑1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 – 2030 (US$M) |
| Figure 5‑2: Leading Competitors, Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, U.S., 2023 |
| Figure 5‑3: SWOT Analysis, DePuy Synthes |
| Figure 5‑4: SWOT Analysis, Globus Medical/NuVasive |
| Figure 5‑5: SWOT Analysis, Joimax |
| Figure 5‑6: SWOT Analysis, Medtronic |
| Figure 5‑7: SWOT Analysis, SI-BONE |
| Figure 5‑8: SWOT Analysis, Stryker |
| Figure 5‑9: SWOT Analysis, VGI Medical |
| Figure 5‑10: SWOT Analysis, ZimVie |
| Figure 6‑1: Procedure Codes Investigated, U.S., 2023 |
| Figure 6‑2: Minimally Invasive Spinal Procedures by Segment, U.S., 2023 – 2030 |
| Figure 6‑3: MIS Interbody Device Procedures by Segment, U.S., 2023 – 2030 |
| Figure 6‑4: Total Levels Treated, MIS Interbody Device, U.S., 2023 – 2030 |
| Figure 6‑5: Total MIS Interbody Device Procedures, U.S., 2023 – 2030 |
| Figure 6‑6: MIPLIF Procedures, U.S., 2023 – 2030 |
| Figure 6‑7: MITLIF Procedures, U.S., 2023 – 2030 |
| Figure 6‑8: LLIF Procedures, U.S., 2023 – 2030 |
| Figure 6‑9: OLIF Procedures, U.S., 2023 – 2030 |
| Figure 6‑10: MIS Pedicle Screw Procedures by Segment, U.S., 2023 – 2030 |
| Figure 6‑11: Total Levels Treated, MIS Pedicle Screw, U.S., 2023 – 2030 |
| Figure 6‑12: Total MIS Pedicle Screw Procedures, U.S., 2023 – 2030 |
| Figure 6‑13: Percutaneous Cannulated Pedicle Screw Procedures, U.S., 2023 – 2030 |
| Figure 6‑14: Retractor Cannulated Pedicle Screw Procedures, U.S., 2023 – 2030 |
| Figure 6‑15: Retractor Non-Cannulated Pedicle Screw Procedures, U.S., 2023 – 2030 |
| Figure 6‑16: Spinous Process Fixation Procedures, U.S., 2023 – 2030 |
| Figure 6‑17: Facet Fixation Procedures, U.S., 2023 – 2030 |
| Figure 6‑18: MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Procedures, U.S., 2023 – 2030 |
| Figure 6‑19: Spine Endoscope Procedures, U.S., 2023 – 2030 |
| Figure 7‑1: MIS Interbody Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2023 – 2030 (US$M) |
| Figure 7‑2: MIS Interbody Device Market, U.S., 2023 – 2030 |
| Figure 7‑3: MIPLIF Market, U.S., 2023 – 2030 |
| Figure 7‑4: MITLIF Market, U.S., 2023 – 2030 |
| Figure 7‑5: LLIF Market, U.S., 2023 – 2030 |
| Figure 7‑6: OLIF Market, U.S., 2023 – 2030 |
| Figure 7‑7: Leading Competitors, MIS Interbody Device Market, U.S., 2023 |
| Figure 8‑1: MIS Pedicle Screw Market by Segment, U.S., 2023 – 2030 (US$M) |
| Figure 8‑2: MIS Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2023 – 2030 |
| Figure 8‑3: Percutaneous Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2023 – 2030 |
| Figure 8‑4: Retractor Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2023 – 2030 |
| Figure 8‑5: Retractor Non-Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2023 – 2030 |
| Figure 8‑6: Leading Competitors, MIS Pedicle Screw Market, U.S., 2023 |
| Figure 9‑1: Spinous Process Fixation Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030 |
| Figure 9‑2: Leading Competitors, Spinous Process Fixation Market, U.S., 2023 |
| Figure 10‑1: Facet Fixation Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030 |
| Figure 10‑2: Leading Competitors, Facet Fixation Market, U.S., 2023 |
| Figure 11‑1: MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030 |
| Figure 11‑2: Leading Competitors, MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Market, U.S., 2023 |
| Figure 12‑1: Spine Endoscope Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 – 2030 (US$M) |
| Figure 12‑2: Endoscope Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030 |
| Figure 12‑3: Spine Endoscope Instrumentation Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030 |
| Figure 12‑4: Leading Competitors, Spine Endoscope Market, U.S., 2023 |
| Figure 13‑1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery Instrumentation Market, U.S., 2020 – 2030 |
| Figure 13‑2: Leading Competitors, Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery Instrumentation Market, U.S., 2023 |
