
Spinal Implants Market Size, Share, & COVID-19 Impact Analysis | United States | 2021-2027 | MedSuite | Includes: Cervical Fixation Market, Interbody Device Market, and 6 more
- Year: 2021
- Scope: 10 Years
- Region: United States
- Pages: 311
- Type: MedSuite
Overall, the U.S. spinal implants market was valued at $5.1 billion in 2020. Due to the global COVID-19 pandemic, this was a 14% decrease from the 2019 market value. However, this is expected to increase over the forecast period at a CAGR of 3.6% to reach $6.5 billion by 2027.
Currently, the top competitors within the U.S. spinal implants market are Medtronic and DePuy Synthes. Medtronic led the total U.S. spinal implant and vertebral compression fracture (VCF) market in 2020.
Throughout this medical market research, we analyzed over 30 spinal implant companies in the U.S. and used our comprehensive methodology to understand the market sizes, unit sales, company market shares, procedure volumes, and to create accurate forecasts.
MARKET DATA INCLUDED
- Unit Sales, Average Selling Prices, Market Size & Growth Trends
- Procedure Numbers
- COVID-19 Impact Analysis
- Market Drivers & Limiters
- Market Forecasts Until 2027, and Historical Data to 2017
- Recent Mergers & Acquisitions
- Company Profiles and Product Portfolios
- Leading Competitors
PROCEDURE NUMBERS
Throughout this study on the U.S. spinal implants market, iData Research has performed an analysis on cervical fixation procedures, thoracolumbar fixation procedures, interbody fusion procedures, motion preservation procedures, vertebral compression fracture procedures, and electrical stimulation procedures to increase the accuracy of our market sizing and provide you with the volume of procedures over a 10-year range.
U.S. SPINAL IMPLANTS MARKET INSIGHTS
2020 was an unusual year because in recent years the market value had been increasing year over year; in 2020 however, the market value decreased dramatically due to the pandemic. However, the U.S. spinal implants market is still growing despite the many factors limiting growth because of the increase in the number of people above the age of 50. In terms of growth, the cervical artificial disk (CAD) segment has seen strong growth while others fell short of expectation.
MARKET SEGMENTATION SUMMARY
- Procedure Numbers for Spinal Implants and VCF – Includes:
- Cervical Fixation Procedures, Thoracolumbar Fixation Procedures, Interbody Device Procedures, Motion Preservation Procedures, Vertebral Compression Fracture Procedures, Spinal Electrical Stimulation Device Procedures
- Cervical Fixation Market – Further Segmented Into:
- Anterior Cervical Fixation Market, Posterior Cervical Fixation Market
- Thoracolumbar Fixation Market – Further Segmented Into:
- Degenerative Thoracolumbar Fixation Market, Deformity Correction Thoracolumbar Fixation Market, Trauma/Tumor Thoracolumbar Fixation Market
- Interbody Device Market – Further Segmented Into:
- ALIF Market, PLIF Market, TLIF Market, and CIF Market, VBR/Corpectomy Market, Expandable Interbody Device Market, Standalone Interbody Device Market
- Motion Preservation Market – Further Segmented Into:
- Artificial Disc Market, Dynamic Stabilization Market
- Vertebral Compression Market – Further Segmented Into:
- Vertebral Compression Fracture Market, Vertebroplasty Market, Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation Market
- Electrical Stimulation Device Market – Further Segmented Into:
- Cervical Electrical Stimulation Devices and Lumbar Electrical Stimulation Devices
- Spinal Surgery Instrumentation Market – Includes:
- Data aggregated for tools not otherwise mentioned in other segments and procedures – for example, scalpels, catheters, rongeurs, clamps, forceps, retractors, and cannula, in addition to other products.
- Neuromonitoring Market – Further Segmented Into:
- Neuromonitoring Device Market, Neuromonitoring System Market, Neuromonitoring Accessory Market
MARKET SHARE INSIGHTS
The U.S. spinal implants market was controlled by Medtronic and DePuy Synthes. Medtronic led the total U.S. spinal implant and VCF market in 2020. The company gained this ranking through its strong performance in most segments, particularly the cervical fixation, interbody and vertebral compression fracture markets. The only segment in which Medtronic was not present was electrical stimulation.
RESEARCH SCOPE SUMMARY
Report Attribute | Details |
---|---|
Region | North America (United States) |
Base Year | 2020 |
Forecast | 2021-2027 |
Historical Data | 2017-2020 |
Quantitative Coverage | Procedure Numbers, Market Size, Market Shares, Market Forecasts, Market Growth Rates, Units Sold, and Average Selling Prices. |
Qualitative Coverage | COVID-19 Impact, Market Growth Trends, Market Limiters, Competitive Analysis & SWOT for Top Competitors, Mergers & Acquisitions, Company Profiles, Product Portfolios, Disease Overviews. |
Data Sources | Primary Interviews with Industry Leaders, Government Physician Data, Regulatory Data, Hospital Private Data, Import & Export Data, iData Research Internal Database. |
TABLE of CONTENTS |
List of Figures |
List of Charts |
executive summary |
U.S. Spinal Implant and VCF Market Overview |
Competitive Analysis |
Market Trends |
Market Developments |
Procedure Numbers |
Procedure Codes Investigated |
Markets Included |
Key Report Updates |
Version History |
research methodology |
Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection |
Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research |
Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design |
Step 4: Performing Primary Research |
Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates |
Step 6: Market Forecast and Analysis |
Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities |
Step 8: Final Review and Market Release |
Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring |
impact of covid-19 on THE U.S. Spinal Implant and VCF Market |
2.1 Introduction |
2.2 Analysis By Market Segment |
2.2.1 Worst Case Scenario |
2.2.2 Base Case Scenario |
2.2.3 Best Case Scenario |
Disease Overview |
Product Assessment |
4.1 Introduction |
4.2 Product Portfolios |
4.3 Regulatory Issues and Recalls |
4.4 Clinical Trials |
U.S. Spinal Implant and VCF Market Overview |
5.1 Introduction |
5.2 Market Overview & Trend Analysis |
5.3 Drivers and Limiters |
5.3.1 Market Drivers |
5.3.2 Market Limiters |
5.4 Competitive Market Share Analysis |
5.5 Mergers and Acquisitions |
5.6 Company Profiles |
5.7 SWOT Analysis |
Procedure Numbers |
6.1 Introduction |
6.2 Procedures |
6.2.1 Cervical Fixation Procedures |
6.2.1.1 Anterior Cervical Fixation Procedures |
6.2.1.1.1 Constrained Anterior Cervical Fixation Procedures |
6.2.1.1.2 Semi-Constrained Anterior Cervical Fixation Procedures |
6.2.1.1.3 Dynamic Anterior Cervical Fixation Procedures |
6.2.1.1.4 Bioresorbable Anterior Cervical Fixation Procedures |
6.2.1.2 Posterior Cervical Fixation Procedures |
6.2.1.2.1 Cable/Wiring Posterior Cervical Fixation Procedures |
6.2.1.2.2 Screw/Rod Posterior Cervical Fixation Procedures |
6.2.1.2.3 Occipitocervical Posterior Cervical Fixation Procedures |
6.2.2 Thoracolumbar Fixation Procedures |
6.2.2.1 Degenerative Thoracolumbar Fixation Procedures |
6.2.2.1.1 Anterior Degenerative Thoracolumbar Fixation Procedures |
6.2.2.1.2 Posterior Degenerative Thoracolumbar Fixation Procedures |
6.2.2.2 Deformity Correction Thoracolumbar Fixation Procedures |
6.2.2.3 Trauma/Tumor Thoracolumbar Fixation Procedures |
6.2.3 Interbody Device Procedures |
6.2.3.1 ALIF Procedures |
6.2.3.1.1 ALIF Procedures by Material Type |
6.2.3.1.2 ALIF Procedures by Care Setting |
6.2.3.2 PLIF Procedures |
6.2.3.2.1 PLIF Procedures by Material Type |
6.2.3.2.2 PLIF Procedures by Care Setting |
6.2.3.3 TLIF Procedures |
6.2.3.3.1 TLIF Procedures by Material Type |
6.2.3.3.2 TLIF Procedures by Care Setting |
6.2.3.4 CIF Procedures |
6.2.3.4.1 CIF Procedures by Material Type |
6.2.3.4.2 CIF Procedures by Care Setting |
6.2.3.5 VBR/Corpectomy Procedures |
6.2.3.5.1 VBR/Corpectomy Procedures by Material Type |
6.2.3.5.2 VBR/Corpectomy Procedures by Care Setting |
6.2.3.6 Expandable Interbody Device Procedures |
6.2.3.6.1 Expandable Interbody Device Procedures by Material Type |
6.2.3.6.2 Expandable Interbody Device Procedures by Care Setting |
6.2.3.7 Standalone Interbody Device Procedures |
6.2.3.7.1 Standalone Interbody Device Procedures by Material Type |
6.2.3.7.2 Standalone Interbody Device Procedures by Care Setting |
6.2.4 Motion Preservation Procedures |
6.2.4.1 Artificial Disc Procedures |
6.2.4.2 Dynamic Stabilization Procedures |
6.2.5 Vertebral Compression Fracture Procedures |
6.2.5.1 Vertebroplasty Procedures |
6.2.5.2 Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation Procedures |
6.2.1 Spinal Electrical Stimulation Device Procedures |
Cervical Fixation Market |
7.1 Introduction |
7.2 Market Overview |
7.3 Market Analysis and Forecast |
7.3.1 Anterior Cervical Fixation Market |
7.3.1.1 Constrained Anterior Cervical Fixation Market |
7.3.1.2 Semi-Constrained Anterior Cervical Fixation Market |
7.3.1.3 Dynamic Anterior Cervical Fixation Market |
7.3.1.4 Bioresorbable Anterior Cervical Fixation Market |
7.3.2 Posterior Cervical Fixation Market |
7.3.2.1 Cable/Wiring Posterior Cervical Fixation Market |
7.3.2.2 Screw/Rod Posterior Cervical Fixation Market |
7.3.2.3 Occipitocervical Posterior Cervical Fixation Market |
7.4 Drivers and Limiters |
7.4.1 Market Drivers |
7.4.2 Market Limiters |
7.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis |
Thoracolumbar Fixation Market |
8.1 Introduction |
8.2 Market Overview |
8.3 Market Analysis and Forecast |
8.3.1 Degenerative Thoracolumbar Fixation Market |
8.3.1.1 Degenerative Thoracolumbar Fixation Market by Approach |
8.3.1.1.1 Anterior Plating Degenerative Thoracolumbar Fixation Market |
8.3.1.1.2 Posterior Plating Degenerative Thoracolumbar Fixation Market |
8.3.1.2 Degenerative Thoracolumbar Fixation Market by Levels Treated |
8.3.1.2.1 Single-Level Degenerative Thoracolumbar Fixation Market |
8.3.1.2.2 Two-Level Degenerative Thoracolumbar Fixation Market |
8.3.1.2.3 Multi-Level Degenerative Thoracolumbar Fixation Market |
8.3.2 Deformity Correction Thoracolumbar Fixation Market |
8.3.3 Trauma/Tumor Thoracolumbar Fixation Market |
8.4 Drivers and Limiters |
8.4.1 Market Drivers |
8.4.2 Market Limiters |
8.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis |
Interbody Device Market |
9.1 Introduction |
9.2 Market Overview |
9.3 Market Analysis and Forecast |
9.3.1 Interbody Device Market |
9.3.2 ALIF Market |
9.3.2.1 Metal ALIF Market |
9.3.2.2 PEEK ALIF Market |
9.3.2.3 Machined Bone ALIF Market |
9.3.2.4 3D Printed ALIF Market |
9.3.3 PLIF Market |
9.3.3.1 Metal PLIF Market |
9.3.3.2 PEEK PLIF Market |
9.3.3.3 Machined Bone PLIF Market |
9.3.3.4 3D Printed PLIF Market |
9.3.4 TLIF Market |
9.3.4.1 Metal TLIF Market |
9.3.4.2 PEEK TLIF Market |
9.3.4.3 Machined Bone TLIF Market |
9.3.4.4 3D Printed TLIF Market |
9.3.5 CIF Market |
9.3.5.1 Metal CIF Market |
9.3.5.2 PEEK CIF Market |
9.3.5.3 Machined Bone CIF Market |
9.3.5.4 3D Printed CIF Market |
9.3.6 VBR/Corpectomy Market |
9.3.6.1 VBR/Corpectomy Market by Material Type |
9.3.6.1.1 Metal VBR/Corpectomy Market |
9.3.6.1.2 PEEK VBR/Corpectomy Market |
9.3.6.1.3 3D Printed VBR/Corpectomy Market |
9.3.6.2 VBR/Corpectomy Market by Anatomy |
9.3.6.2.1 Cervical VBR/Corpectomy Market |
9.3.6.2.2 Lumbar VBR/Corpectomy Market |
9.3.6.3 VBR/Corpectomy Market by Device Type |
9.3.6.3.1 Static VBR/Corpectomy Market |
9.3.6.3.2 Expandable VBR/Corpectomy Market |
9.3.7 Expandable Interbody Device Market |
9.3.7.1 Expandable Interbody Device Market by Material Type |
9.3.7.1.1 Metal Expandable Interbody Device Market |
9.3.7.1.2 PEEK Expandable Interbody Device Market |
9.3.7.1.3 3D Printed Expandable Interbody Device Market |
9.3.7.2 Expandable Interbody Device Market by Approach |
9.3.7.2.1 PLIF/TLIF Expandable Interbody Device Market |
9.3.7.2.2 LLIF Expandable Interbody Device Market |
9.3.8 Standalone Interbody Device Market |
9.3.8.1 Standalone Interbody Device Market by Material Type |
9.3.8.1.1 Metal Standalone Interbody Device Market |
9.3.8.1.2 PEEK Standalone Interbody Device Market |
9.3.8.1.3 3D Printed Standalone Interbody Device Market |
9.3.8.2 Standalone Interbody Device Market by Anatomy |
9.3.8.2.1 Cervical Standalone Interbody Device Market |
9.3.8.2.2 Lumbar Standalone Interbody Device Market |
9.3.8.3 Standalone Interbody Device Market by Approach |
9.3.8.3.1 ALIF Standalone Interbody Device Market |
9.3.8.3.2 LLIF Standalone Interbody Device Market |
9.4 Drivers and Limiters |
9.4.1 Market Drivers |
9.4.2 Market Limiters |
9.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis |
Motion Preservation Market |
10.1 Introduction |
10.2 Market Overview |
10.3 Market Analysis and Forecast |
10.3.1 Artificial Disc Market |
10.3.1.1 Cervical Artificial Disc Market |
10.3.1.2 Lumbar Artificial Disc Market |
10.3.2 Dynamic Stabilization Market |
10.3.2.1 Dynamic Posterior Stabilization Market |
10.3.2.2 Interspinous Process Stabilization Market |
10.4 Drivers and Limiters |
10.4.1 Market Drivers |
10.4.2 Market Limiters |
10.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis |
Vertebral Compression Fracture Market |
11.1 Introduction |
11.2 Market Overview |
11.3 Market Analysis and Forecast |
11.3.1 Vertebral Compression Fracture Market |
11.3.2 Vertebroplasty Market |
11.3.3 Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation Market |
11.4 Drivers and Limiters |
11.4.1 Market Drivers |
11.4.2 Market Limiters |
11.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis |
Electrical Stimulation Market |
12.1 Introduction |
12.2 Market Overview |
12.3 Market Analysis and Forecast |
12.3.1 Electrical Stimulation Market |
12.3.2 Cervical Electrical Stimulation Market |
12.3.3 Lumbar Electrical Stimulation Market |
12.4 Drivers and Limiters |
12.4.1 Market Drivers |
12.4.2 Market Limiters |
12.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis |
Spinal Surgery Instrumentation Market |
13.1 Introduction |
13.2 Market Analysis and Forecast |
13.3 Drivers and Limiters |
13.3.1 Market Drivers |
13.3.2 Market Limiters |
13.4 Competitive Market Share Analysis |
Neuromonitoring Market |
14.1 Introduction |
14.2 Market Overview |
14.3 Market Analysis and Forecast |
14.3.1 Neuromonitoring Device Market |
14.3.2 Neuromonitoring System Market |
14.3.3 Neuromonitoring Accessory Market |
14.4 Drivers and Limiters |
14.4.1 Market Drivers |
14.4.2 Market Limiters |
14.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis |
Abbreviations |
· Aesculap |
· Alphatec Spine |
· Atlas Spine |
· Cadwell |
· Centinel |
· Choice Spine |
· Corelink Surgical |
· CTL Amedica |
· DePuy Synthes |
· DJO |
· Exatech |
· Globus Medical |
· iMEDICOM |
· Inion |
· Inomed |
· IzI Medical |
· Life Spine |
· Medtronic |
· Merit Medical |
· Natus |
· NuVasive |
· Orthofix |
· Paradigm BioDevices |
· RTI Surgical |
· Seaspine |
· Sintea Plustek |
· Spinal Elements |
· Stryker |
· Ulrich Medical |
· Vertiflex |
· Zavation |
· Zimmer Biomet |
Chart 1‑1: Spinal Implant and VCF Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 – 2027 |
Chart 1‑2: Spinal Implant and VCF Market Overview, U.S., 2020 & 2027 |
Chart 2‑1: Multi-Scenario Spinal Implant and VCF Market Forecast, U.S., 2017 – 2027 (US$M) |
Chart 5‑1: Spinal Implant and VCF Market by Segment, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Chart 5‑2: Leading Competitors, Spinal Implant and VCF Market, U.S., 2020 |
Chart 6‑1: Spine Procedures by Segment, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Chart 7‑1: Cervical Fixation Market by Segment, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Chart 7‑2: Leading Competitors, Cervical Fixation Market, U.S., 2020 |
Chart 8‑1: Thoracolumbar Fixation Market by Segment, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Chart 8‑2: Leading Competitors, Thoracolumbar Fixation Market, U.S., 2020 |
Chart 9‑1: Interbody Device Market by Material Type, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Chart 9‑2: Leading Competitors, Interbody Device Market, U.S., 2020 |
Chart 10‑1: Motion Preservation Market by Segment, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Chart 10‑2: Leading Competitors, Motion Preservation Market, U.S., 2020 |
Chart 11‑1: Vertebral Compression Fracture Market by Segment, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Chart 11‑2: Leading Competitors, Vertebral Compression Fracture Market, U.S., 2020 |
Chart 12‑1: Electrical Stimulation Market by Segment, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Chart 12‑2: Leading Competitors, Electrical Stimulation Market, U.S., 2020 |
Chart 13‑1: Spinal Surgery Instrumentation Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Chart 13‑2: Leading Competitors, Spinal Surgery Instrumentation Market, U.S., 2020 |
Chart 14‑1: Neuromonitoring Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Chart 14‑2: Leading Competitors, Neuromonitoring Device Market, U.S., 2020 |
Figure 1‑1: Spinal Implant and VCF Market Share Ranking by Segment, U.S., 2020 (1 of 2) |
Figure 1‑2: Spinal Implant and VCF Market Share Ranking by Segment, U.S., 2020 (2 of 2) |
Figure 1‑3: Companies Researched in this Report |
Figure 1‑4: Factors Impacting the Spinal Implant and VCF Market by Segment, U.S. (1 of 2) |
Figure 1‑5: Factors Impacting the Spinal Implant and VCF Market by Segment, U.S. (2 of 2) |
Figure 1‑6: Recent Events in the Spinal Implant and VCF Market, U.S., 2017 – 2020 |
Figure 1‑7: Spinal Implant and VCF Procedures Covered |
Figure 1‑8: Procedure Codes Investigated |
Figure 1‑9: Spinal Implant and VCF Markets Covered |
Figure 1‑10: Key Report Updates |
Figure 1‑11: Version History |
Figure 2‑1: Spinal Implant and VCF Market by Segment, Worst Case Scenario, U.S., 2017 – 2027 (US$M) |
Figure 2‑2: Spinal Implant and VCF Market by Segment, Base Case Scenario, U.S., 2017 – 2027 (US$M) |
Figure 2‑3: Spinal Implant and VCF Market by Segment, Best Case Scenario, U.S., 2017 – 2027 (US$M) |
Figure 5‑1: Spinal Implant and VCF Market by Segment, U.S., 2017 – 2027 (US$M) |
Figure 5‑2: Leading Competitors, Spinal Implant and VCF Market, U.S., 2020 |
Figure 6‑1: Procedure Codes Investigated, U.S., 2020 |
Figure 6‑2: Spine Procedures by Segment, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑3: Cervical Fixation Procedures by Segment, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑4: Total Levels Treated, Cervical Fixation, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑5: Anterior Cervical Fixation Procedures by Segment, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑6: Total Levels Treated, Anterior Cervical Fixation, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑7: Total Anterior Cervical Fixation Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑8: Constrained Anterior Cervical Fixation Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑9: Semi-Constrained Anterior Cervical Fixation Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑10: Dynamic Anterior Cervical Fixation Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑11: Bioresorbable Anterior Cervical Fixation Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑12: Posterior Cervical Fixation Procedures by Segment, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑13: Total Levels Treated, Posterior Cervical Fixation, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑14: Total Posterior Cervical Fixation Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑15: Cable/Wiring Posterior Cervical Fixation Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑16: Screw/Rod Posterior Cervical Fixation Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑17: Occipitocervical Posterior Cervical Fixation Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑18: Cervical Fixation Procedures by Segment, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑19: Total Levels Treated, Cervical Fixation, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑20: Degenerative Thoracolumbar Fixation Procedures by Segment, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑21: Total Levels Treated, Degenerative Thoracolumbar Fixation, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑22: Total Degenerative Thoracolumbar Fixation Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑23: Anterior Degenerative Thoracolumbar Fixation Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑24: Posterior Degenerative Thoracolumbar Fixation Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑25: Degenerative Thoracolumbar Fixation Procedures by Levels Treated, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑23: Deformity Correction Thoracolumbar Fixation Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑23: Trauma/Tumor Thoracolumbar Fixation Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑3: Cervical Fixation Procedures by Segment, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑4: Total Levels Treated, Cervical Fixation, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑12: ALIF Procedures by Material Type, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑13: Total Levels Treated, ALIF, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑14: Total ALIF Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑15: Metal ALIF Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑16: PEEK ALIF Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑17: Machined Bone ALIF Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑17: 3D Printed ALIF Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑12: ALIF Procedures by Care Setting, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑12: PLIF Procedures by Material Type, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑13: Total Levels Treated, PLIF, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑14: Total PLIF Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑15: Metal PLIF Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑16: PEEK PLIF Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑17: Machined Bone PLIF Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑17: 3D Printed PLIF Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑12: PLIF Procedures by Care Setting, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑12: TLIF Procedures by Material Type, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑13: Total Levels Treated, TLIF, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑14: Total TLIF Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑15: Metal TLIF Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑16: PEEK TLIF Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑17: Machined Bone TLIF Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑17: 3D Printed TLIF Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑12: TLIF Procedures by Care Setting, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑12: CIF Procedures by Material Type, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑13: Total Levels Treated, CIF, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑14: Total CIF Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑15: Metal CIF Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑16: PEEK CIF Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑17: Machined Bone CIF Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑17: 3D Printed CIF Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑12: CIF Procedures by Care Setting, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑12: VBR/Corpectomy Procedures by Material Type, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑13: Total Levels Treated, VBR/Corpectomy, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑14: Total VBR/Corpectomy Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑15: Metal VBR/Corpectomy Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑16: PEEK VBR/Corpectomy Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑17: 3D Printed VBR/Corpectomy Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑12: VBR/Corpectomy Procedures by Care Setting, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑12: Expandable Interbody Device Procedures by Material Type, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑13: Total Levels Treated, Expandable Interbody Device, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑14: Total Expandable Interbody Device Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑15: Metal Expandable Interbody Device Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑16: PEEK Expandable Interbody Device Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑17: 3D Printed Expandable Interbody Device Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑12: Expandable Interbody Device Procedures by Care Setting, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑12: Standalone Interbody Device Procedures by Material Type, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑13: Total Levels Treated, Standalone Interbody Device, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑14: Total Standalone Interbody Device Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑15: Metal Standalone Interbody Device Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑16: PEEK Standalone Interbody Device Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑17: 3D Printed Standalone Interbody Device Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑12: Standalone Interbody Device Procedures by Care Setting, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑20: Motion Preservation Procedures by Segment, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑23: Artificial Disc Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑24: Dynamic Stabilization Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑20: Vertebral Compression Fracture Procedures by Segment, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑21: Total Levels Treated, Vertebral Compression Fracture, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑23: Vertebroplasty Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑24: Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 6‑23: Spinal Electrical Stimulation Device Procedures, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 7‑1: Cervical Fixation Market by Segment, U.S., 2017 – 2027 (US$M) |
Figure 7‑2: Anterior Cervical Fixation Market by Segment, U.S., 2017 – 2027 (US$M) |
Figure 7‑3: Total Anterior Cervical Fixation Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 7‑4: Constrained Anterior Cervical Fixation Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 7‑5: Semi-Constrained Anterior Cervical Fixation Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 7‑6: Dynamic Anterior Cervical Fixation Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 7‑7: Bioresorbable Anterior Cervical Fixation Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 7‑8: Posterior Cervical Fixation Market by Segment, U.S., 2017 – 2027 (US$M) |
Figure 7‑9: Total Posterior Cervical Fixation Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 7‑10: Cable/Wiring Posterior Cervical Fixation Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 7‑11: Screw/Rod Posterior Cervical Fixation Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 7‑12: Occipitocervical Posterior Cervical Fixation Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 7‑13: Leading Competitors, Cervical Fixation Market, U.S., 2020 |
Figure 8‑1: Thoracolumbar Fixation Market by Segment, U.S., 2017 – 2027 (US$M) |
Figure 8‑2: Degenerative Thoracolumbar Fixation Market by Approach, U.S., 2017 – 2027 (US$M) |
Figure 8‑3: Total Degenerative Thoracolumbar Fixation Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 8‑4: Anterior Plating Degenerative Thoracolumbar Fixation Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 8‑5: Posterior Plating Degenerative Thoracolumbar Fixation Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 8‑6: Degenerative Thoracolumbar Fixation Market by Levels Treated, U.S., 2017 – 2027 (US$M) |
Figure 8‑7: Total Degenerative Thoracolumbar Fixation Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 8‑8: Single-Level Degenerative Thoracolumbar Fixation Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 8‑9: Two-Level Degenerative Thoracolumbar Fixation Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 8‑10: Multi-Level Degenerative Thoracolumbar Fixation Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 8‑11: Deformity Correction Thoracolumbar Fixation Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 8‑12: Trauma/Tumor Thoracolumbar Fixation Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 8‑13: Leading Competitors, Thoracolumbar Fixation Market, U.S., 2020 |
Figure 9‑1: Interbody Device Market by Material Type, U.S., 2017 – 2027 (US$M) |
Figure 9‑2: Interbody Device Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑3: ALIF Market by Material Type, U.S., 2017 – 2027 (US$M) |
Figure 9‑4: Total ALIF Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑5: Metal ALIF Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑6: PEEK ALIF Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑7: Machined Bone ALIF Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑8: 3D Printed ALIF Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑9: PLIF Market by Material Type, U.S., 2017 – 2027 (US$M) |
Figure 9‑10: Total PLIF Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑11: Metal PLIF Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑12: PEEK PLIF Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑13: Machined Bone PLIF Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑14: 3D Printed PLIF Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑15: TLIF Market by Material Type, U.S., 2017 – 2027 (US$M) |
Figure 9‑16: Total TLIF Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑17: Metal TLIF Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑18: PEEK TLIF Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑19: Machined Bone TLIF Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑20: 3D Printed TLIF Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑21: CIF Market by Material Type, U.S., 2017 – 2027 (US$M) |
Figure 9‑22: Total CIF Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑23: Metal CIF Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑24: PEEK CIF Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑25: Machined Bone CIF Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑26: 3D Printed CIF Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑27: VBR/Corpectomy Market by Material Type, U.S., 2017 – 2027 (US$M) |
Figure 9‑28: Total VBR/Corpectomy Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑29: Metal VBR/Corpectomy Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑30: PEEK VBR/Corpectomy Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑31: 3D Printed VBR/Corpectomy Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑32: VBR/Corpectomy Market by Anatomy, U.S., 2017 – 2027 (US$M) |
Figure 9‑33: Total VBR/Corpectomy Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑34: Cervical VBR/Corpectomy Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑35: Lumbar VBR/Corpectomy Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑36: VBR/Corpectomy Market by Device Type, U.S., 2017 – 2027 (US$M) |
Figure 9‑37: Total VBR/Corpectomy Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑38: Static VBR/Corpectomy Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑39: Expandable VBR/Corpectomy Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑40: Expandable Interbody Device Market by Material Type, U.S., 2017 – 2027 (US$M) |
Figure 9‑41: Total Expandable Interbody Device Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑42: Metal Expandable Interbody Device Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑43: PEEK Expandable Interbody Device Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑44: 3D Printed Expandable Interbody Device Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑45: Expandable Interbody Device Market by Approach, U.S., 2017 – 2027 (US$M) |
Figure 9‑46: Total Expandable Interbody Device Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑47: PLIF/TLIF Expandable Interbody Device Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑48: LLIF Expandable Interbody Device Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑49: Standalone Interbody Device Market by Material Type, U.S., 2017 – 2027 (US$M) |
Figure 9‑50: Total Standalone Interbody Device Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑51: Metal Standalone Interbody Device Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑52: PEEK Standalone Interbody Device Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑53: 3D Printed Standalone Interbody Device Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑54: Standalone Interbody Device Market by Anatomy, U.S., 2017 – 2027 (US$M) |
Figure 9‑55: Total Standalone Interbody Device Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑56: Cervical Standalone Interbody Device Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑57: Lumbar Standalone Interbody Device Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑58: Standalone Interbody Device Market by Approach, U.S., 2017 – 2027 (US$M) |
Figure 9‑59: Total Standalone Interbody Device Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑60: ALIF Standalone Interbody Device Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑61: LLIF Standalone Interbody Device Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 9‑62: Leading Competitors, Interbody Device Market, U.S., 2020 |
Figure 10‑1: Motion Preservation Market by Segment, U.S., 2017 – 2027 (US$M) |
Figure 10‑2: Artificial Disc Market by Segment, U.S., 2017 – 2027 (US$M) |
Figure 10‑3: Total Artificial Disc Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 10‑4: Cervical Artificial Disc Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 10‑5: Lumbar Artificial Disc Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 10‑6: Dynamic Stabilization Market by Segment, U.S., 2017 – 2027 (US$M) |
Figure 10‑7: Total Dynamic Stabilization Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 10‑8: Dynamic Posterior Stabilization Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 10‑9: Interspinous Process Stabilization Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 10‑10: Leading Competitors, Motion Preservation Market, U.S., 2020 |
Figure 11‑1: Vertebral Compression Fracture Market by Segment, U.S., 2017 – 2027 (US$M) |
Figure 11‑2: Vertebral Compression Fracture Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 11‑3: Vertebroplasty Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 11‑4: Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 11‑5: Leading Competitors, Vertebral Compression Fracture Market, U.S., 2020 |
Figure 12‑1: Electrical Stimulation Market by Segment, U.S., 2017 – 2027 (US$M) |
Figure 12‑2: Electrical Stimulation Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 12‑3: Cervical Electrical Stimulation Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 12‑4: Lumbar Electrical Stimulation Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 12‑5: Leading Competitors, Electrical Stimulation Market, U.S., 2020 |
Figure 13‑1: Spinal Surgery Instrumentation Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 13‑2: Leading Competitors, Spinal Surgery Instrumentation Market, U.S., 2020 |
Figure 14‑1: Neuromonitoring Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2017 – 2027 (US$M) |
Figure 14‑2: Neuromonitoring Device Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 14‑3: Neuromonitoring System Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 14‑4: Neuromonitoring Accessory Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027 |
Figure 14‑5: Leading Competitors, Neuromonitoring Device Market, U.S., 2020 |
iData’s 9-Step Research Methodology
Our reports follow an in-depth 9-step methodology which focuses on the following research systems:- Original primary research that consists of the most up-to-date market data
- Strong foundation of quantitative and qualitative research
- Focused on the needs and strategic challenges of the industry participants
Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection During this preliminary investigation, all staff members involved in the industry discusses the topic in detail.
Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research The first task of the research team is to prepare for the data collection process: Filing systems and relational databases are developed as needed.
Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design The core of all iData research reports is primary market research. Interviews with industry insiders represent the single most reliable way to obtain accurate, current data about market conditions, trends, threats and opportunities.
Step 4: Performing Primary Research At this stage, interviews are performed using contacts and information acquired in the secondary research phase.
Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates Following the completion of the primary research phase, the collected information must be synthesized into an accurate view of the market status. The most important question is the current state of the market.
Step 6: Market Forecast and Analysis iData Research uses a proprietary method to combine statistical data and opinions of industry experts to forecast future market values.
Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities iData analysts identify in broad terms why some companies are gaining or losing share within a given market segment.
Step 8: Final Review and Market Release An integral part of the iData research methodology is a built-in philosophy of quality control and continuing improvement is integral to the iData philosophy.
Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring iData philosophy of continuous improvement requires that reports and consulting projects be monitored after release for customer feedback and market accuracy.
Explore Options
Report Summary | FREE |
Spinal Implants Market Size, Share, & COVID-19 Impact Analysis | United States | 2021-2027 | MedSuite | Includes: Cervical Fixation Market, Interbody Device Market, and 6 more
$295 – $9,995
iData’s U.S. spinal implants market MedSuite covers 8 markets including procedure numbers and COVID-19 impacts. The MedSuite is a compilation of all reports related to a specific market. It is ideal for device manufacturers, product managers, marketing managers, and consultants looking for a detailed analysis of every market segment and sub-segment within a given market.
- 2021
- 10 Years
- United States
- 311
- MedSuite



