https://idataresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/ReportIcon-Foot-MS.jpg

Small Bone and Joint Devices Market Size, Share & COVID-19 Impact Analysis | United States | 2022-2028 | MedSuite | Includes: Foot & Ankle Devices, Hand & Wrist Devices, and 2 more

  • Year: 2022
  • Scope: 10 Years
  • Region: United States
  • Type: MedSuite

Overall, the U.S. small bone and joint devices market was valued at $2.5 billion in 2021. This is expected to increase over the forecast period at a CAGR of 6.6% to reach $3.9 billion by 2028.

The full report suite on the U.S. market for small bone and joint orthopedic devices includes shoulder reconstruction and fixation devices, elbow repair devices, hand and wrist devices and foot and ankle devices. The market is segmented by anatomy, and each anatomy is specifically segmented further by implant types, particularly from total joint reconstruction to internal fixation and bone fusion.

MARKET REPORT DATA TYPES INCLUDED

  • Unit Sales, Average Selling Prices, Market Value & Growth Trends
  • 10 Year Scope
  • Market Drivers & Limiters for Each Segment
  • Competitive Analysis with Market Shares for Each Segment
  • Recent Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Disease Overviews and Demographic Information
  • Company Profiles, Product Portfolios and SWOT for Top Competitors

U.S. SMALL BONE AND JOINT DEVICES MARKET TRENDSU.S. small joints

One of the main trends in the small joints orthopedic device market is a shift towards digital technology, digital surgery, robotics and data insights to improve patient care. For example, 3D-printing technology is a personalized orthopedic solution that fully adjusts to the specific anatomical and clinical needs of each individual patient. There is a general belief that the emerging 3D-printing technology may potentially make manufacturing custom implants more cost effective in the long term, as this personalized instrumentation allows for more positioning precision in placing implants during operations.

COVID-19 IMPACT ON THE U.S. SMALL BONE AND JOINT DEVICES MARKET

The effects of the pandemic on the U.S. small bone and joint orthopedic device market are expected to vary by market segment. During portions of the pandemic, non-essential visits to hospitals were not possible, which limited the ability of manufacturers to sell their products. A considerable portion of the global suppliers, distributors and production sites were located in pandemic-affected areas. Restrictive government restrictions have had a significant negative impact on global supply chains.

U.S. SMALL BONE AND JOINT DEVICES MARKET SHARE INSIGHTS

Overall, within the U.S. small bone and joint market there are three dominant competitors: Stryker, DePuy Synthes, and Zimmer Biomet.U.S. Small bone and joint market leadersIn 2021, Stryker held the leading position in the U.S. market for small bone and joint orthopedic devices. The company has a notable presence in all segments of the small bone and joint device market. Stryker had a strong presence in the elbow repair market, shoulder reconstruction market and hand and wrist device market. Stryker was the leading company in the foot and ankle segment.

MARKET SEGMENTATION SUMMARY

While this report suite contains all applicable market data, each of the markets are also available as stand alone MedCore reports. This allows you to get access to only the specific market segment research that you need. You can view all these included reports and segmentation here:

  • Shoulder Reconstruction Device Market – MedCore – The shoulder implant market includes the anatomic, reversed, hemi, resurfacing and revision shoulder markets, as well as the shoulder internal fixation plate and screw market.
  • Elbow Repair Device Market – MedCore – The elbow repair and fixation market is segmented into primary elbow, radial head implants and internal fixation devices.
  • Foot and Ankle Device Market – MedCore – The foot and ankle device market includes the primary ankle replacement, ankle arthrodesis, bunion, talus replacement, syndesmotic repair, hindfoot, midfoot internal fixation, foot digit and hammertoe device markets.
  • Hand and Wrist Device Market — MedCore — The hand and wrist market is divided into total wrist implants, wrist fusion, ulnar head replacement, hand digit implants and distal radius plate and screw segments.

Research Scope Summary

Report Attribute Details
Regions United States
Base Year 2021
Forecast 2022-2028
Historical Data 2018-2021
Quantitative Coverage Market Size, Market Shares, Market Forecasts, Market Growth Rates, Units Sold, and Average Selling Prices.
Qualitative Coverage COVID-19 Impact, Market Growth Trends, Market Limiters, Competitive Analysis & SWOT for Top Competitors, Mergers & Acquisitions, Company Profiles, Product Portfolios, FDA Recalls, Disruptive Technologies, Disease Overviews.
Data Sources Primary Interviews with Industry Leaders, Government Physician Data, Regulatory Data, Hospital Private Data, Import & Export Data, iData Research Internal Database.

 

FREE Sample Report

The "Small Foot and Joint Devices Market " includes analysis on the following companies currently active in this market:
4Web Medical Lima USA
Acumed Medacta
Anika Therapeutics Medartis
Aptis Medical Nextremity Solution
Arrowhead Devices Novastep
Arthrex Nutek Orthopedics
BioPro Olympus
BioTek Orthofix
CarboFix Orthopedics OrthoPediatric
Catalyst OrthoScience Ossio
Conventus Orthopedics Osteomed
Corin Group Paragon 28
DePuy Synthes Restor3d
DJO Shoulder Innovations
Exactech Skeletal Dynamics
FX Shoulder Smith & Nephew
Globus Medical Southern Medical
Hanger Orthopedic Group Stryker
HealthpointCapital Treace Medical Concepts
I.T.S. Trimed
In2Bones Zimmer Biomet
Kapp Surgical Instruments
LIST OF CHARTS
Chart 1 1: Small Bone and Joint Orthopedic Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2021 – 2028 3
Chart 1 2: Small Bone and Joint Orthopedic Device Market Overview, U.S., 2021 & 2028 3
Chart 2 1: Multi-Scenario Small Bone and Joint Orthopedic Device Market Forecast, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 36
Chart 5 1: Small Bone and Joint Orthopedic Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 137
Chart 5 2: Leading Competitors, Small Bone and Joint Orthopedic Device Market, U.S., 2021 152
Chart 6 1: Small Bone and Joint Orthopedic Procedures by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 187
Chart 7 1: Shoulder Reconstruction Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 234
Chart 7 2: Leading Competitors, Shoulder Reconstruction Device Market, U.S., 2021 262
Chart 8 1: Elbow Repair Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 268
Chart 8 2: Leading Competitors, Elbow Repair Device Market, U.S., 2021 286
Chart 9 1: Hand and Wrist Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 295
Chart 9 2: Leading Competitors, Hand and Wrist Device Market, U.S., 2021 311
Chart 10 1: Foot & Ankle Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 318
Chart 10 2: Leading Competitors, Foot & Ankle Device Market, U.S., 2021 364
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 1: Small Bone and Joint Orthopedic Device Market Share Ranking by Segment, U.S., 2021 5
Figure 1 2: Companies Researched in this Report 6
Figure 1 3: Factors Impacting the Small Bone and Joint Orthopedic Device Market by Segment, U.S. 7
Figure 1 4: Recent Events in the Small Bone and Joint Orthopedic Device Market, U.S.,  2019 – 2021 (1 of 3) 8
Figure 1 5: Recent Events in the Small Bone and Joint Orthopedic Device Market, U.S.,  2019 – 2021 (2 of 3) 9
Figure 1 6: Recent Events in the Small Bone and Joint Orthopedic Device Market, U.S.,  2019 – 2021 (3 of 3) 10
Figure 1 7: Small Bone and Joint Orthopedic Device Procedures Covered (1 of 2) 11
Figure 1 8: Small Bone and Joint Orthopedic Device Procedures Covered (2 of 2) 12
Figure 1 9: Procedure Codes Investigated 13
Figure 1 10: Small Bone and Joint Orthopedic Device Markets Covered (1 of 2) 14
Figure 1 11: Small Bone and Joint Orthopedic Device Markets Covered (2 of 2) 15
Figure 1 12: Key Report Updates 16
Figure 1 13: Version History 16
Figure 2 1: Small Bone and Joint Orthopedic Device Market by Segment, Worst Case Scenario, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 33
Figure 2 2: Small Bone and Joint Orthopedic Device Market by Segment, Base Case Scenario, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 34
Figure 2 3: Small Bone and Joint Orthopedic Device Market by Segment, Best Case Scenario, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 35
Figure 4 1: Elbow Repair Device by Company (1 of 4) 51
Figure 4 2: Elbow Repair Device by Company (2 of 4) 52
Figure 4 3: Elbow Repair Device by Company (3 of 4) 53
Figure 4 4: Elbow Repair Device by Company (4 of 4) 54
Figure 4 5: Foot and Ankle Device Market Products by Company (1 of 9) 57
Figure 4 6: Foot and Ankle Device Market Products by Company (2 of 9) 58
Figure 4 7: Foot and Ankle Device Market Products by Company (3 of 9) 59
Figure 4 8: Foot and Ankle Device Market Products by Company (4 of 9) 60
Figure 4 9: Foot and Ankle Device Market Products by Company (5 of 9) 61
Figure 4 10: Foot and Ankle Device Market Products by Company (6 of 9) 62
Figure 4 11: Foot and Ankle Device Market Products by Company (7 of 9) 63
Figure 4 12: Foot and Ankle Device Market Products by Company (8 of 9) 64
Figure 4 13: Foot and Ankle Device Market Products by Company (9 of 9) 65
Figure 4 14: Hand and Wrist Device Market Products by Company (1 of 6) 68
Figure 4 15: Hand and Wrist Device Market Products by Company (2 of 6) 69
Figure 4 16: Hand and Wrist Device Market Products by Company (3 of 6) 70
Figure 4 17: Hand and Wrist Device Market Products by Company (4 of 6) 71
Figure 4 18: Hand and Wrist Device Market Products by Company (5 of 6) 72
Figure 4 19: Hand and Wrist Device Market Products by Company (6 of 6) 73
Figure 4 20: Shoulder Reconstruction Device Market Products by Company (1 of 7) 76
Figure 4 21: Shoulder Reconstruction Device Market Products by Company (2 of 7) 77
Figure 4 22: Shoulder Reconstruction Device Market Products by Company (3 of 7) 78
Figure 4 23: Shoulder Reconstruction Device Market Products by Company (4 of 7) 79
Figure 4 24: Shoulder Reconstruction Device Market Products by Company (6 of 7) 80
Figure 4 25: Shoulder Reconstruction Device Market Products by Company (7 of 7) 81
Figure 4 26: Class 2 Device Recall Tibial Opening Wedge Osteotomy Plate, Titanium 82
Figure 4 27: Class 2 Device Recall Arthrex Fracture Plates and Screws; Low Profile Screw, cannulated 82
Figure 4 28: Class 2 Device Recall Low Profile Screw, 4.5 x 20 mm 82
Figure 4 29: Class 2 Device Recall 2.4mm Valcp Intercarpal Fusion System 83
Figure 4 30: Class 2 Device Recall DePuy Synthes 83
Figure 4 31: Class 2 Device Recall DePuy Synthes 84
Figure 4 32: Class 2 Device Recall Vantage Total Ankle System 85
Figure 4 33:Class 2 Device Recall Tibial Insert 85
Figure 4 34: Class 2 Device Equinoxe Humeral Stem 85
Figure 4 35: Class 2 Device Recall Equinoxe Shoulder System 86
Figure 4 36:Class 2 Device Recall Equinoxe Reverse Shoulder Compression Screw/Locking Cap Kit 86
Figure 4 37 Class 2 Device Recall Exactech Equinoxe Platform Fracture Stem 86
Figure 4 38 Class 2 Device Recall KWire 86
Figure 4 39:Class 2 Device Recall Salto Talaris Total Ankle Prosthesis 87
Figure 4 40: Class 2 Device Recall Integra XT Sloped Talar Dome 88
Figure 4 41: Class 2 Device Recall bioBLOCK Implant 88
Figure 4 42: Class 2 Device Recall TITAN 88
Figure 4 43: Class 2 Device Recall Ascension Silicone PIP Silicone 89
Figure 4 44: Class 2 Device Recall Cannulated Screw 90
Figure 4 45: Class 2 Device Recall Smith & Nephew EVOS screws 90
Figure 4 46: Class 2 Device Recall Cannulated Screw 90
Figure 4 47: Class 2 Device Recall Bone Screw 90
Figure 4 48: Class 2 Device Recall Stryker 91
Figure 4 49: Class 2 Device Recall Nail Insertion Sleeve 91
Figure 4 50: Class 2 Device Recall Stryker 92
Figure 4 51: Class 2 Device Recall Stryker T2 Alpha Delta Strike Plate IMN Instruments 92
Figure 4 52: Class 2 Device Recall Screw Removal Case Assembly 93
Figure 4 53:Class 2 Device Recall INBONE Tibial Tray 93
Figure 4 54: Class 2 Device Recall Evolve Proline Radial Head System 93
Figure 4 55: Class 2 Device Recall Wright Evolve Proline Head 94
Figure 4 56: Class 2 Device Recall Coonrad/Morrey Total Elbow Humeral Assembly 95
Figure 4 57: Class 2 Device Recall Total Foot and Ankle, Trabecular Metal Total Ankle 95
Figure 4 58: Class 2 Device Recall (3.0mm, 4.0, 5.0, 8.0) Cannulated Screw System 96
Figure 4 59: Class 2 Device Recall PHOENIX 96
Figure 4 60: Class 2 Device Recall T7 Driver Cannulated AO 96
Figure 4 61: Class 2 Device Recall A.L.P.S. Clavicle Plating System 97
Figure 4 62: Class 2 Device Recall Comprehensive Total Shoulder System/BioModular Choice Shoulder System 97
Figure 4 63: Class 2 Device Recall Comprehensive Reverse Shoulder System 97
Figure 4 64: Class 2 Device Recall 98
Figure 4 65: Class 2 Device Recall BIOMET Orthopedics 98
Figure 4 66: Class 2 Device Recall Medacta Shoulder SYSTEM HUMERAL ANATOMICAL METAPHYSIS 99
Figure 4 67: Class 2 Device Recall Bigliani Flatow Shoulder System/Bigliani Flatow The Complete Shoulder Solution 99
Figure 4 68: Class 2 Device Recall Trabecular Metal Reverse Shoulder System 99
Figure 4 69: Class 2 Device Recall Trilliant Surgical Ltd Small Joint Reaming System 100
Figure 4 70: Class 2 Device Recall Compress 100
Figure 4 71: Class 2 Device Recall Infinity ACL Tibial Elbow and Tip Guides 101
Figure 4 72: Class 2 Device Recall Nextremity Solutions 101
Figure 4 73: Class 2 Device Recall Nextra Hammertoe Correction System 101
Figure 4 74: Class 2 Device Recall Stratum Foot Plating System 102
Figure 4 75: Class 2 Device Recall Coventus Flower 102
Figure 4 76: Class 2 Device Recall WishBone Medical Plate and Screw System 102
Figure 4 77: Class 2 Device Recall Flower Rearfoot Plating Set 103
Figure 4 78: Class 2 Device Recall Ally Bone ScrewL 103
Figure 4 79 Class 2 Device Recall AltiVate Anatomic Shoulder System 104
Figure 4 80 Class 2 Device Recall The Aequalis Ascend Flex Shoulder System 104
Figure 4 81 Class 2 Device Recall AltiVate Reverse Small Socket Insert 104
Figure 4 82 Class 2 Device Recall Match Point System Patient specific instrumentation for shoulder arthroplasty 105
Figure 4 83: A Study Comparing Computerized Tomographic Progression of Bone Bridging After Subtalar Fusion Using Fully and Partially Threaded Screws 106
Figure 4 84: Intramedullary Nailing Versus Plate Fixation of Ankle Fractures. A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial. 106
Figure 4 85: Evaluate the Continued Safety and Performance of the Foot and Ankle Products 107
Figure 4 86: Registry of Arthrex Hand and Wrist Products 107
Figure 4 87: A Multi-Center, Prospective Registry to Evaluate the Continued Safety and Performance of Clavicle Plates 108
Figure 4 88: Humeral Head Implants: Radiological and Clinical Evaluation 108
Figure 4 89: Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Multi-Center Registry 109
Figure 4 90: Plate Fixation of Distal Femur Fractures: A Protocol for a Study of Two Plate Options 110
Figure 4 91: Observational Case Series on the Clinical Performance of the DePuy Synthes Variable Angle Clavicle Plate and Clavicle Hook Plate 2.7 Systems 110
Figure 4 92: Effectiveness of Hemi- Versus Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Using Implants of the "Epoca" System (Epoca H vs T) 111
Figure 4 93: Clinical Results and RSA Migration Analysis of the GLOBAL ICON - Stemless Anatomic Shoulder 111
Figure 4 94: A 2-Year Prospective Follow-up Study of the Global Unite Reverse Fracture Shoulder System for Proximal Humerus Fractures 112
Figure 4 95: Ankle Joint Replacement Outcomes Study 113
Figure 4 96: A Multi-center Outcomes Clinical Study of the PyroTITAN™ HRA Shoulder Implant in Humeral Head Resurfacing (CHRA) 113
Figure 4 97: Long Term Follow-up of Integra® Cadence™ Total Ankle System in Primary Ankle Joint Replacement 114
Figure 4 98: Clinical Evaluation of the Integra® Titan™ Modular Shoulder System Generation 2.5 for Primary Shoulder Joint Replacement 114
Figure 4 99: TITAN™ Reverse Shoulder System 115
Figure 4 100: Patient Benefit from the New Modular Shoulder Prosthesis PROMOS (Promos) 115
Figure 4 101: Clinical Evaluation of the TITAN™ Total Shoulder System 115
Figure 4 102: Comparing the Outcome of Large-Diameter vs Small-Diameter Glenospheres in Primary Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty 116
Figure 4 103: A Post-Market Clinical Evaluation of the ReUnion Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty (RSA) System 116
Figure 4 104: A Post-Market Clinical Evaluation of the ReUnion TSA System 117
Figure 4 105: Comparing the Outcome of Large-Diameter vs Small-Diameter Glenospheres in Primary Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty 117
Figure 4 106 A Post-Market Clinical Evaluation of the ReUnion Reversible Fracture (RFX) System 118
Figure 4 107: Wright™ Elbow Outcomes Clinical Study (WELBOW) (WELBOW) 119
Figure 4 108: INFINITY™ Total Ankle Replacement Follow-up (ITAR) 119
Figure 4 109: INFINITY™ WITH ADAPTIS™ TECHNOLOGY STUDY (ITAR2) 120
Figure 4 110: Wright Foot & Ankle Post-Market Observational Study 120
Figure 4 111: UK Infinity, Post-Market Clinical Follow-up Study 120
Figure 4 112: Hand & Wrist Pyrocarbon Implants Outcomes Clinical Study (HaWPYC) 121
Figure 4 113: Aequalis® Resurfacing Head Study 121
Figure 4 114: Clinical Outcomes in Shoulder Hemi-arthroplasty Using a PyC Spherical Interpositional Implant 122
Figure 4 115: Clinical Outcomes Study of the Nexel Total Elbow 123
Figure 4 116: ExploR™ Modular Radial Head Data Collection 123
Figure 4 117: Zimmer Trabecular Metal Total Ankle 124
Figure 4 118: Zimmer® MotionLoc® in Distal Tibia Fractures 125
Figure 4 119: TESS V3 Modular Total Shoulder System PMCF 125
Figure 4 120: Comprehensive Reverse Shoulder Data Collection 126
Figure 4 121: Sidus(TM) Post Market Clinical Follow-up (PMCF) Study 126
Figure 4 122: Clinical Experience with the Zimmer Trabecular Metal (TM) Glenoid in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (TMGlenoid) 126
Figure 4 123: Elbow Hemiarthroplasty Versus ORIF for Distal Humeral Fractures 127
Figure 4 124: Evaluation of Surgical Treatment of Terrible Triade Injury of the Elbow Joint 127
Figure 4 125: Comparing Ankle Fusion to Ankle Replacement 128
Figure 4 126: Agili-CTM Implant Performance Evaluation in the Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Great Toe 128
Figure 4 127: Motec Versus Remotion Total Wrist Arthroplasty - A Prospective Study 129
Figure 4 128: Comparison of Three Fixation Techniques for Displaced Distal Radius Fractures (DRF) 129
Figure 4 129: Buried Intramedullary K-wire Fixation Compared with Plate and Screw Fixation in Unstable Extra-Articular Metacarpal Fractures 130
Figure 4 130: Fibular Fixation in Ankle Fractures: Plate Verses Nail 130
Figure 4 131: Plate Fixation of Distal Femur Fractures: A Protocol for a Study of Two Plate Options 131
Figure 4 132: Lateral Mini Approach vs Anterior Approach for Plating of Proximal Humerus Fracture (HURA) 131
Figure 5 1: Small Bone and Joint Orthopedic Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 136
Figure 5 2: Leading Competitors, Small Bone and Joint Orthopedic Device Market, U.S., 2021 151
Figure 5 3: SWOT Analysis, Acumed 171
Figure 5 4: SWOT Analysis, Arthrex 172
Figure 5 5: SWOT Analysis, BioPro 173
Figure 5 6: SWOT Analysis, DePuy Synthes 174
Figure 5 7: SWOT Analysis, DJO Global 175
Figure 5 8: SWOT Analysis, Exactech 176
Figure 5 9: SWOT Analysis, Paragon 28 177
Figure 5 10: SWOT Analysis, Smith & Nephew 178
Figure 5 11: SWOT Analysis, Stryker 179
Figure 5 12: SWOT Analysis, Wright Medical 180
Figure 5 13: SWOT Analysis, Treace Medical Concepts 181
Figure 5 14: SWOT Analysis, Zimmer Biomet 182
Figure 6 1: Procedure Codes Investigated, U.S., 2021 183
Figure 6 2: Small Bone and Joint Orthopedic Procedures by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 186
Figure 6 3: Shoulder Procedures by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 189
Figure 6 4: Shoulder Procedures by Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 190
Figure 6 5: Total Shoulder Replacement Procedures by Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 191
Figure 6 6: Reversed Shoulder Replacement Procedures by Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 192
Figure 6 7: Hemi Shoulder Replacement Procedures by Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 193
Figure 6 8: Shoulder Resurfacing Procedures by Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 194
Figure 6 9: Shoulder Revision Procedures by Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 195
Figure 6 10: Proximal Humerus ORIF Procedures by Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 196
Figure 6 11: Elbow Procedures by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 197
Figure 6 12: Elbow Procedures by Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 198
Figure 6 13: Primary Elbow Replacement Procedures by Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 199
Figure 6 14: Radial Head Replacement Procedures by Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 200
Figure 6 15: Elbow ORIF Procedures by Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 201
Figure 6 16: Hand & Wrist Procedures by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 203
Figure 6 17: Hand & Wrist Procedures by Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 204
Figure 6 18: Wrist Replacement Procedures by Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 205
Figure 6 19: Wrist Fusion Procedures by Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 206
Figure 6 20: Ulnar Head Replacement Procedures by Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 207
Figure 6 21: Hand Digit Implant Procedures by Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 208
Figure 6 22: Distal Radius ORIF Procedures by Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 209
Figure 6 23: Foot & Ankle Procedures by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (1 of 2) 210
Figure 6 24: Foot & Ankle Procedures by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (2 of 2) 211
Figure 6 25: Foot & Ankle Procedures by Setting by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 212
Figure 6 26: Primary Ankle Replacement Procedures by Setting by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 213
Figure 6 27: Ankle Fusion Procedures by Setting by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 214
Figure 6 28: Midfoot Fixation Procedures by Setting by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 215
Figure 6 29: Bunion Treatment Procedures by Setting by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 216
Figure 6 30: Bunion Procedure by Approach by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 217
Figure 6 31: Hindfoot Procedures by Setting by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 218
Figure 6 32: Hindfoot Procedures by Approach by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 219
Figure 6 33: Foot Digit Implant Procedures by Setting by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 220
Figure 6 34: Foot Digit Implant Procedures by Approach, U.S., 2018 – 2028 221
Figure 6 35: Hammertoe Correction Procedures by Setting by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 222
Figure 6 36: Hammertoe Correction Procedures by Approach, U.S., 2018 – 2028 223
Figure 6 37: Talus Replacement Procedures by Setting by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 224
Figure 6 38: Syndesmotic Repair Procedures by Setting by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 225
Figure 7 1: Shoulder Reconstruction Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 233
Figure 7 2: Shoulder Reconstruction Device Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 235
Figure 7 3: Total Shoulder Implant Market by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 237
Figure 7 4: Total Shoulder Implant Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 237
Figure 7 5: Stemmed Total Shoulder Implant Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 238
Figure 7 6: Stemless Total Shoulder Implant Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 240
Figure 7 7: Reversed Shoulder Implant Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 242
Figure 7 8: Hemi Shoulder Implant Market by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 243
Figure 7 9: Total Hemi Shoulder Implant Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 244
Figure 7 10: Stemmed Hemi Shoulder Implant Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 245
Figure 7 11: Stemless Hemi Shoulder Implant Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 246
Figure 7 12: Resurfacing Shoulder Implant Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 248
Figure 7 13: Revision Shoulder Implant Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 249
Figure 7 14: Shoulder Plate & Screw Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 251
Figure 7 15: Leading Competitors, Shoulder Reconstruction Device Market, U.S., 2021 261
Figure 8 1: Elbow Repair Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 267
Figure 8 2: Elbow Repair Device Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 269
Figure 8 3: Primary Elbow Implant Market by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 271
Figure 8 4: Total Primary Elbow Implant Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 272
Figure 8 5: Semi-Constrained Primary Elbow Implant Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 273
Figure 8 6: Unconstrained Primary Elbow Implant Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 274
Figure 8 7: Radial Head Implant Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 275
Figure 8 8: Elbow Plate & Screw Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 277
Figure 8 9: Leading Competitors, Elbow Repair Device Market, U.S., 2021 285
Figure 9 1: Hand and Wrist Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 294
Figure 9 2: Wrist Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 296
Figure 9 3: Wrist Fusion Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 297
Figure 9 4: Ulnar Head Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 298
Figure 9 5: Hand Digit Implant Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 300
Figure 9 6: Distal Radius Plate & Screw Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 302
Figure 9 7: Leading Competitors, Hand and Wrist Device Market, U.S., 2021 310
Figure 10 1: Foot & Ankle Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) (1 of 2) 317
Figure 10 2: Foot & Ankle Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) (2 of 2) 317
Figure 10 3: Primary Ankle Replacement Market by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 319
Figure 10 4: Total Primary Ankle Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 320
Figure 10 5: Mobile Bearing Ankle Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 321
Figure 10 6: Fixed Bearing Ankle Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 322
Figure 10 7: Total Ankle Fusion Market by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 324
Figure 10 8: Ankle Cannulated Screw Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 325
Figure 10 9: Ankle Plate & Screw Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 326
Figure 10 10: Ankle Intramedullary Nail Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 327
Figure 10 11: Midfoot Fixation Market by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 328
Figure 10 12:  Midfoot Cannulated Screw Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 329
Figure 10 13:  Midfoot Plate & Screw Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 330
Figure 10 14: Bunion Treatment Market by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 332
Figure 10 15: Bunion Burr Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 333
Figure 10 16: Bunion K-wire/Reduction Wire Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 334
Figure 10 17: Bunion Screw Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 335
Figure 10 18: Bunion Lapiplasty System Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 336
Figure 10 19: Hindfoot Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 337
Figure 10 20: Total Hindfoot Device Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 338
Figure 10 21: Hindfoot Cannulated Screw Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 339
Figure 10 22: Hindfoot Subtalar Implant Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 340
Figure 10 23: Foot Digit Market by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 342
Figure 10 24: Total Foot Digit Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 343
Figure 10 25: First Metatarsal Phalangeal Implant Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 344
Figure 10 26: First Metatarsal Phalangeal Hemi Implant Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 345
Figure 10 27: Lesser Toe Implant Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 346
Figure 10 28: Hammertoe Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 347
Figure 10 29: Total Hammertoe Device Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 348
Figure 10 30: Hammertoe Implant Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 349
Figure 10 31: Hammertoe K-wire Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 350
Figure 10 32: Talus Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 351
Figure 10 33: Syndesmotic Repair Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 352
Figure 10 34: Leading Competitors, Foot & Ankle Device Market, U.S., 2021 (1 of 2) 362
Figure 10 35: Leading Competitors, Foot & Ankle Device Market, U.S., 2021 (2 of 2) 363

iData’s 9-Step Research Methodology

Our reports follow an in-depth 9-step methodology which focuses on the following research systems:

  • Original primary research that consists of the most up-to-date market data
  • Strong foundation of quantitative and qualitative research
  • Focused on the needs and strategic challenges of the industry participants

Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection During this preliminary investigation, all staff members involved in the industry discusses the topic in detail.

Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research The first task of the research team is to prepare for the data collection process: Filing systems and relational databases are developed as needed.

Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design The core of all iData research reports is primary market research. Interviews with industry insiders represent the single most reliable way to obtain accurate, current data about market conditions, trends, threats and opportunities.

Step 4: Performing Primary Research At this stage, interviews are performed using contacts and information acquired in the secondary research phase.

Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates Following the completion of the primary research phase, the collected information must be synthesized into an accurate view of the market status. The most important question is the current state of the market.

Step 6: Market Forecast and Analysis iData Research uses a proprietary method to combine statistical data and opinions of industry experts to forecast future market values.

Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities iData analysts identify in broad terms why some companies are gaining or losing share within a given market segment.

Step 8: Final Review and Market Release An integral part of the iData research methodology is a built-in philosophy of quality control and continuing improvement is integral to the iData philosophy.

Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring iData philosophy of continuous improvement requires that reports and consulting projects be monitored after release for customer feedback and market accuracy.

Click Here to Read More About Our Methodology