Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Market Size, Share & COVID-19 Impact Analysis | Global | 2022-2028 | MedSuite | Includes: MIS Interbody Devices Market, MIS Pedicle Screws Market, and 5 more
- Year: 2022
- Scope: 10 Years
- Region: Global
- Type: MedSuite
iData’s Global minimally invasive spinal implant market was valued at $3.7 million in 2021. This is expected to increase over the forecast period at a CAGR of 8.4% to reach $6.4 million.
The full report suite on the global market for the minimally invasive spinal (MIS) implant market, covering 70 countries and 7 regions, includes the MIS interbody market, MIS pedicle screw market, spinous process fixation market, facet fixation market, spine endoscope market and MIS surgery instrumentation.
MARKET REPORT DATA TYPES INCLUDED
- Unit Sales, Average Selling Prices, Market Value & Growth Trends
- Forecasts Until 2028, and Historical Data to 2018
- Market Drivers & Limiters for Each Segment
- Competitive Analysis with Market Shares for Each Segment
- Recent Mergers & Acquisitions
- Procedure Volumes
- Company Profiles, Product Portfolios and SWOT for Top Competitors
- COVID-19 Impact Analysis
GLOBAL MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL IMPLANTS MARKET TRENDS
The MIS market is experiencing year-over-year growth, with the highest growth occurring in the spine endoscope market. The smallest segment of the overall market in 2021 was spinous process fixation, which is also expected to grow at the lowest rate among all segments.
COVID-19 IMPACT ANALYSIS ON THE GLOBAL MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL IMPLANTS MARKET
The effects of the pandemic on the global minimally invasive spinal implant market have been different in each segment. The MIS interbody device market experienced the steepest declines in 2020 The MIS pedicle screw market was the second-most-affected market in 2020. The least-impacted segment was the facet fixation market. All of the segments of this market experienced double-digit growth rates in 2021, except for spinous process fixation, and were able to recover from the impacts of the pandemic.
GLOBAL MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL IMPLANT MARKET SHARE INSIGHTS
Overall, within the Global Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants market there are two dominant competitors: Medtronic, DePuy Synthes, and NuVasive.
Medtronic was the leading competitor in the global MIS implant market. Its share was a result of its second-leading position in the MIS interbody device and MIS pedicle screw segments. Medtronic held the second-leading position in facet fixation and the third-leading position in spinous process fixation.
MARKET SEGMENTATION SUMMARY
While this report suite contains all applicable market data, each of the markets are also available as stand alone MedCore reports. This allows you to get access to only the specific market segment research that you need. You can view all these included reports and segmentation here:
- Procedure Volumes for Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery – MedPro – Using a number of databases, internal and external, we’re able to provide you with the total volume of minimally invasive spinal implants procedures being performed for each of the markets mentioned in this suite of reports.
- MIS Interbody Device Market – MedCore – Covers segmentation into the MIPLIF Market, MITLIF Market, LLIF Market, and OLIF Market.
- MIS Pedicle Screw Market – MedCore – Segmented into 2 main markets: Percutaneous Cannulated Pedicle Screws and Retractor MIS Pedicle Screws.
- Spinous Process Fixation Market – MedCore – This market covers several spinal fixation systems including both plating and rod and screws systems.
- Facet Fixation Market – MedCore – Facet fixation is a type of percutaneous minimally invasive surgery in which the facet joints in the thoracolumbar region are fused using facet screws, bolts or allograft dowels.
- MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Market – MedCore – SIJD can also be known as SI joint syndrome, SI joint strain and SI joint inflammation. Surgical treatment involves fusing the SI joint via an open surgery approach.
- Spinal Endoscopy Market – MedCore – Spine endoscopes are visualization instrumen
ts that allow for a minimally invasive approach to various procedures and resemble other arthroscopic and laparoscopic devices. - MIS Surgery Instrumentation Market – MedCore – Spinal instrumentation is used to stabilize the spine and carry out the procedure during minimally invasive spinal (MIS) procedures.
GLOBAL RESEARCH SCOPE
| Report Attribute | Details |
|---|---|
| Regions | North America (Canada, United States) Latin America (Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Mexico, Peru, Venezuela) Western Europe (Austria, Benelux, France, Germany, Italy, Portugal, Scandinavia, Spain, Switzerland, U.K.) Central & Eastern Europe (Baltic States, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Greece, Hungary, Kazakhstan, Poland, Romania, Russia, Turkey, Ukraine) Middle East (Bahrain, Iran, Israel, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates) Asia Pacific (Australia, Cambodia, China, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Japan, Malaysia, Myanmar, New Zealand, Philippines, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, Vietnam) Africa (Algeria, Egypt, Ghana, Kenya, Libya, Morocco, Nigeria, South Africa, Sudan, Uganda) |
| Base Year | 2021 |
| Forecast | 2022-2028 |
| Historical Data | 2018-2021 |
| Quantitative Coverage | Market Size, Market Shares, Market Forecasts, Market Growth Rates, Units Sold, and Average Selling Prices. |
| Qualitative Coverage | COVID19 Impact, Market Growth Trends, Market Limiters, Competitive Analysis & SWOT for Top Competitors, Mergers & Acquisitions, Company Profiles, Product Portfolios, FDA Recalls, Disruptive Technologies, Disease Overviews. |
| Data Sources | Primary Interviews with Industry Leaders, Government Physician Data, Regulatory Data, Hospital Private Data, Import & Export Data, iData Research Internal Database. |
| TABLE OF CONTENTS I |
| LIST OF FIGURES X |
| LIST OF CHARTS XIX |
| EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 |
| GLOBAL MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL IMPLANT MARKET OVERVIEW 1 |
| COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS 3 |
| MARKET TRENDS 6 |
| MARKET DEVELOPMENTS 7 |
| PROCEDURES INCLUDED 9 |
| MARKETS INCLUDED 10 |
| REGIONS INCLUDED 11 |
| VERSION HISTORY 12 |
| RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 13 |
| Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection 13 |
| Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research 16 |
| Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design 18 |
| Step 4: Performing Primary Research 19 |
| Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates 21 |
| Step 6: Market Forecast and Analysis 22 |
| Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities 24 |
| Step 8: Final Review and Market Release 25 |
| Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring 26 |
| IMPACT OF COVID-19 ON THE GLOBAL MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL IMPLANT MARKET 27 |
| 2.1 INTRODUCTION 27 |
| 2.2 REGIONAL PROFILES 30 |
| 2.3 ANALYSIS BY MARKET SEGMENT 32 |
| 2.3.1 Worst Case Scenario 32 |
| 2.3.2 Base Case Scenario 33 |
| 2.3.3 Best Case Scenario 34 |
| DISEASE OVERVIEW 36 |
| 3.1 INTRODUCTION 36 |
| 3.1.1 Degenerative Disc Disease 36 |
| 3.1.1.1 Disc Herniation 36 |
| 3.1.1.2 Stenosis 37 |
| 3.1.1.3 Spondyloisthesis 37 |
| 3.1.1.4 Arthritis 38 |
| 3.1.2 Spinal Deformities 38 |
| 3.1.2.1 Scoliosis 38 |
| 3.1.2.2 Kyphosis and Lordosis 39 |
| 3.1.3 Trauma and Tumor 40 |
| 3.1.4 Vertebral Compression Fractures 40 |
| 3.1.4.1 Osteoporosis 40 |
| 3.1.4.2 Vertebral Compression Fractures 41 |
| PRODUCT ASSESSMENT 42 |
| 4.1 INTRODUCTION 42 |
| 4.2 PRODUCT PORTFOLIOS 42 |
| 4.2.1 Cervical Fixation 42 |
| 4.2.1.1 Anterior Cervical Fixation 43 |
| 4.2.1.1.1 Constrained 43 |
| 4.2.1.1.2 Semi-Constrained 43 |
| 4.2.1.1.3 Dynamic 43 |
| 4.2.1.1.4 Bioresorbable 44 |
| 4.2.1.2 Posterior Cervical Fixation 44 |
| 4.2.2 Facet Fixation 47 |
| 4.2.3 Interbody Devices 49 |
| 4.2.3.1 Approaches 49 |
| 4.2.3.1.1 ALIF 49 |
| 4.2.3.1.2 PLIF 50 |
| 4.2.3.1.3 TLIF 50 |
| 4.2.3.1.4 Minimally Invasive PLIF 50 |
| 4.2.3.1.5 Minimally Invasive TLIF 51 |
| 4.2.3.1.6 LLIF 51 |
| 4.2.3.1.7 OLIF 51 |
| 4.2.3.1.8 Cervical 51 |
| 4.2.3.1.9 VBR/Corpectomy 52 |
| 4.2.3.2 Materials 52 |
| 4.2.3.2.1 Metal 52 |
| 4.2.3.2.2 PEEK 52 |
| 4.2.3.2.3 Machined Bone Allograft 52 |
| 4.2.4 MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion 56 |
| 4.2.5 Motion Preservation Devices 58 |
| 4.2.5.1 Artificial Discs 58 |
| 4.2.5.2 Dynamic Stabilization 58 |
| 4.2.5.2.1 Posterior Dynamic Stabilization 58 |
| 4.2.5.2.2 Interspinous Process Decompression 58 |
| 4.2.5.2.3 Nucleus Replacement 59 |
| 4.2.5.2.4 Facet Arthroplasty 59 |
| 4.2.6 Spinous Process Fixation 62 |
| 4.2.7 Spinal Electrical Stimulation Devices 64 |
| 4.2.8 Spine Endoscopes 66 |
| 4.2.9 Thoracolumbar Fixation 68 |
| 4.2.9.1 Traditional Systems 68 |
| 4.2.9.2 Minimally Invasive Systems 68 |
| 4.2.10 Vertebral Compression Fracture Devices 72 |
| 4.2.10.1 Percutaneous Vertebroplasty 72 |
| 4.2.10.2 Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation Including Kyphoplasty 73 |
| 4.3 REGULATORY ISSUES AND RECALLS 75 |
| 4.3.1 Medtronic 75 |
| 4.3.2 VGI Medical 76 |
| 4.3.3 Zimmer Biomet 77 |
| 4.4 CLINICAL TRIALS 80 |
| 4.4.1 Cervical Fixation 80 |
| 4.4.1.1 Other Companies 80 |
| 4.4.2 Interbody Devices 81 |
| 4.4.2.1 Other Companies 81 |
| 4.4.3 Facet Fixation 83 |
| 4.4.3.1 Medtronic 83 |
| 4.4.3.2 Other Companies 84 |
| 4.4.4 Percutaneous Vertebroplasty 84 |
| 4.4.4.1 Other Companies 84 |
| GLOBAL MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL IMPLANT MARKET OVERVIEW 86 |
| 5.1 INTRODUCTION 86 |
| 5.1.1 Minimally Invasive Interbody Fusion 86 |
| 5.1.1.1 Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion 87 |
| 5.1.1.2 Minimally Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion 88 |
| 5.1.1.3 Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion 88 |
| 5.1.1.1.4 Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion 89 |
| 5.1.2 Minimally Invasive Surgery Pedicle Screws 89 |
| 5.1.2.1 Percutaneous MIS Systems 89 |
| 5.1.2.2 Retractor-Based MIS Systems 89 |
| 5.1.3 Spinous Process Fixation 90 |
| 5.1.4 Facet Fixation 90 |
| 5.1.5 MIS Spine Endoscopes 90 |
| 5.2 MARKET OVERVIEW & TREND ANALYSIS 92 |
| 5.2.1 By Segment 92 |
| 5.2.2 By Region 96 |
| 5.3 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 99 |
| 5.3.1 Market Drivers 99 |
| 5.3.2 Market Limiters 100 |
| 5.4 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 101 |
| 5.5 MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS 109 |
| 5.6 COMPANY PROFILES 114 |
| 5.6.1 DePuy Synthes 114 |
| 5.6.2 Globus Medical 115 |
| 5.6.3 Joimax 117 |
| 5.6.4 Medtronic 118 |
| 5.6.5 NuVasive 119 |
| 5.6.6 SI-BONE 120 |
| 5.6.7 Stryker 121 |
| 5.6.8 VGI Medical 122 |
| 5.6.9 Zimmer Biomet 123 |
| 5.7 SWOT ANALYSIS 125 |
| 5.7.1 DePuy Synthes 126 |
| 5.7.2 Globus Medical 127 |
| 5.7.3 Joimax 128 |
| 5.7.4 Medtronic 129 |
| 5.7.5 NuVasive 130 |
| 5.7.6 SI-BONE 132 |
| 5.7.7 Stryker 133 |
| 5.7.8 VGI Medical 135 |
| 5.7.9 Zimmer Biomet 136 |
| MIS INTERBODY DEVICE MARKET 137 |
| 6.1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 137 |
| 6.1.1 Global MIS Interbody Device Market Overview 137 |
| 6.1.2 Competitive Analysis 139 |
| 6.1.3 Procedures Included 140 |
| 6.1.4 Markets Included 140 |
| 6.1.5 Regions Included 141 |
| 6.2 INTRODUCTION 143 |
| 6.2.1.1 Minimally Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion 143 |
| 6.2.1.2 Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion 143 |
| 6.2.1.3 Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion 144 |
| 6.2.1.4 Direct Lateral Interbody Fusion 144 |
| 6.2.1.5 eXtreme Lateral Interbody Fusion 144 |
| 6.2.1.6 Guided Lateral Interbody Fusion 145 |
| 6.2.1.7 Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion 145 |
| 6.3 PROCEDURE NUMBERS 146 |
| 6.3.1 MIPLIF Procedures 159 |
| 6.3.2 MITLIF Procedures 169 |
| 6.3.3 LLIF Procedures 179 |
| 6.3.4 OLIF Procedures 189 |
| 6.4 MARKET OVERVIEW 199 |
| 6.4.1 By Segment 200 |
| 6.4.2 By Region 202 |
| 6.5 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 204 |
| 6.5.1 Total MIS Interbody Device Market 204 |
| 6.5.2 MIPLIF Market 208 |
| 6.5.3 MITLIF Market 213 |
| 6.5.4 LLIF Market 218 |
| 6.5.5 OLIF Market 222 |
| 6.6 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 226 |
| 6.6.1 Market Drivers 226 |
| 6.6.2 Market Limiters 227 |
| 6.7 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 228 |
| MIS PEDICLE SCREW MARKET 233 |
| 7.1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 233 |
| 7.1.1 Global MIS Pedicle Screw Market Overview 233 |
| 7.1.2 Competitive Analysis 235 |
| 7.1.3 Regions Included 236 |
| 7.2 INTRODUCTION 238 |
| 7.2.1 Percutaneous MIS Systems 238 |
| 7.2.2 Retractor-Based MIS Systems 238 |
| 7.3 PROCEDURE NUMBERS 239 |
| 7.4 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 252 |
| 7.5 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 258 |
| 7.5.1 Market Drivers 258 |
| 7.5.2 Market Limiters 259 |
| 7.6 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 260 |
| SPINOUS PROCESS FIXATION MARKET 265 |
| 8.1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 265 |
| 8.1.1 Global Spinous Process Fixation Market Overview 265 |
| 8.1.2 Competitive Analysis 267 |
| 8.1.3 Regions Included 268 |
| 8.2 INTRODUCTION 270 |
| 8.3 PROCEDURE NUMBERS 271 |
| 8.4 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 283 |
| 8.5 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 289 |
| 8.5.1 Market Drivers 289 |
| 8.5.2 Market Limiters 290 |
| 8.6 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 291 |
| FACET FIXATION MARKET 295 |
| 9.1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 295 |
| 9.1.1 Global Facet Fixation Market Overview 295 |
| 9.1.2 Competitive Analysis 297 |
| 9.1.3 Regions Included 298 |
| 9.2 INTRODUCTION 300 |
| 9.3 PROCEDURE NUMBERS 301 |
| 9.4 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 313 |
| 9.5 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 319 |
| 9.5.1 Market Drivers 319 |
| 9.5.2 Market Limiters 320 |
| 9.6 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 321 |
| SPINE ENDOSCOPE MARKET 325 |
| 10.1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 325 |
| 10.1.1 Global Spine Endoscope Market Overview 325 |
| 10.1.2 Competitive Analysis 328 |
| 10.1.3 Markets Included 329 |
| 10.1.4 Regions Included 330 |
| 10.2 INTRODUCTION 332 |
| 10.3 PROCEDURE NUMBERS 333 |
| 10.4 MARKET OVERVIEW 345 |
| 10.4.1 By Segment 346 |
| 10.4.2 By Region 348 |
| 10.5 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 350 |
| 10.5.1 Endoscope Market 350 |
| 10.5.2 Instrumentation Market 354 |
| 10.6 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 358 |
| 10.6.1 Market Drivers 358 |
| 10.6.2 Market Limiters 359 |
| 10.7 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 360 |
| MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL SURGERY INSTRUMENTATION MARKET 363 |
| 11.1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 363 |
| 11.1.1 Global Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery Instrumentation Market Overview 363 |
| 11.1.2 Competitive Analysis 366 |
| 11.1.3 Regions Included 367 |
| 11.2 INTRODUCTION 369 |
| 11.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 370 |
| 11.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 376 |
| 11.4.1 Market Drivers 376 |
| 11.4.2 Market Limiters 377 |
| 11.5 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 378 |
| ABBREVIATIONS 382 |
| Kinetic Medical | Trans 1 |
| Life Instruments |
U & I Corporation
|
| Life Spine | Ulrich Medical |
| Life Healthcare | VGI Medical |
| LifeSciences |
Vimex Endoscopy
|
| LinkBio Corp | Weigao Ortho |
| Maxer Endoscopy | Xtant Medical |
| Medfix Instruments | Zimmer Biomet |
| Medtronic |
| Chart 1-1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, Global, 2021 – 2028 2 |
| Chart 1-2: MIS Interbody Device Procedures, Global, 2021 2 |
| Chart 2-1: Multi-Scenario Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Forecast, Global, 2018 – 2028 |
| (US$M) 35 |
| Chart 5-1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, Global, 2018 – 2028 95 |
| Chart 5-2: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Region, Global, 2018 – 2028 98 |
| Chart 5-3: Leading Competitors, Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, Global, 2021 108 |
| Chart 6-1: MIS Interbody Device Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 138 |
| Chart 6-2: MIS Interbody Device Procedures, Global, 2021 138 |
| Chart 6-3: MIS Interbody Device Procedures by Segment, Global, 2018 – 2028 149 |
| Chart 6-4: MIS Interbody Device Market by Segment, Global, 2018 – 2028 201 |
| Chart 6-5: MIS Interbody Device Market by Region, Global, 2018 – 2028 203 |
| Chart 6-6: Leading Competitors, MIS Interbody Device Market, Global, 2021 232 |
| Chart 7-1: MIS Pedicle Screw Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 234 |
| Chart 7-2: MIS Pedicle Screw Procedures, Global, 2021 234 |
| Chart 7-3: MIS Pedicle Screw Procedures by Region, Global, 2018 – 2028 242 |
| Chart 7-4: MIS Pedicle Screw Device Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 254 |
| Chart 7-5: Leading Competitors, MIS Pedicle Screw Market, Global, 2021 264 |
| Chart 8-1: Spinous Process Fixation Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 266 |
| Chart 8-2: Spinous Process Fixation Procedures, Global, 2021 266 |
| Chart 8-3: Spinous Process Fixation Procedures by Region, Global, 2018 – 2028 273 |
| Chart 8-4: Spinous Process Fixation Device Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 285 |
| Chart 8-5: Leading Competitors, Spinous Process Fixation Market, Global, 2021 294 |
| Chart 9-1: Facet Fixation Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 296 |
| Chart 9-2: Facet Fixation Procedures, Global, 2021 296 |
| Chart 9-3: Facet Fixation Procedures by Region, Global, 2018 – 2028 303 |
| Chart 9-4: Facet Fixation Device Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 315 |
| Chart 9-5: Leading Competitors, Facet Fixation Market, Global, 2021 324 |
| Chart 10-1: Spine Endoscope Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 327 |
| Chart 10-2: Spine Endoscope Procedures, Global, 2021 327 |
| Chart 10-3: Endoscopic Procedures by Region, Global, 2018 – 2028 335 |
| Chart 10-4: Spine Endoscope Device Market by Segment, Global, 2018 – 2028 347 |
| Chart 10-5: Spine Endoscope Device Market by Region, Global, 2018 – 2028 349 |
| Chart 10-6: Leading Competitors, Spine Endoscope Market, Global, 2021 362 |
| Chart 11-1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery Instrumentation Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 365 |
| Chart 11-2: Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery Instrumentation Device Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 372 |
| Figure 1-1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Share Ranking by Segment, Global, 2021 3 |
| Figure 1-2: Companies Researched in this Report (1 of 2) 4 |
| Figure 1-3: Companies Researched in this Report (2 of 2) 5 |
| Figure 1-4: Factors Impacting the Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, Global 6 |
| Figure 1-5: Recent Events in the Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market (1 of 2), Global, 2018 – 2021 7 |
| Figure 1-6: Recent Events in the Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market (2 of 2), Global, 2018 – 2021 8 |
| Figure 1-7: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Procedures Covered 9 |
| Figure 1-8: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Markets Covered 10 |
| Figure 1-9: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Regions Covered, Global (1 of 2) 11 |
| Figure 1-10: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Regions Covered, Global (2 of 2) 12 |
| Figure 1-11: Version History 12 |
| Figure 2-1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, Worst Case Scenario, Global, 2018 – |
| 2028 (US$M) 32 |
| Figure 2-2: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, Base Case Scenario, Global, 2018 – |
| 2028 (US$M) 33 |
| Figure 2-3: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, Best Case Scenario, Global, 2018 – |
| 2028 (US$M) 34 |
| Figure 4-1: Cervical Fixation Devices by Company (1 of 2) 45 |
| Figure 4-2: Cervical Fixation Devices by Company (2 of 2) 46 |
| Figure 4-3: Facet Fixation Devices by Company 48 |
| Figure 4-4: Interbody Devices by Company (1 of 3) 53 |
| Figure 4-5: Interbody Devices by Company (2 of 3) 54 |
| Figure 4-6: Interbody Devices by Company (3 of 3) 55 |
| Figure 4-7: MIS Sacroiliac Joint Devices by Company 57 |
| Figure 4-8: Cervical Artificial Disc Devices by Company 60 |
| Figure 4-9: Lumbar Artificial Disc Devices by Company 60 |
| Figure 4-10: Dynamic Posterior Stabilization Devices by Company 61 |
| Figure 4-11: Interspinous Process Decompression Devices by Company 61 |
| Figure 4-12: Spinous Process Fixation Devices by Company 63 |
| Figure 4-13: Spinal Electrical Stimulation Devices by Company 65 |
| Figure 4-14: Spine Endoscopes by Company 67 |
| Figure 4-15: Thoracolumbar Fixation Devices by Company (1 of 3) 69 |
| Figure 4-16: Thoracolumbar Fixation Devices by Company (2 of 3) 70 |
| Figure 4-17: Thoracolumbar Fixation Devices by Company (3 of 3) 71 |
| Figure 4-18: Vertebral Compression Fracture Devices by Company 74 |
| Figure 4-19: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic Prestige LP(TM) Cervical Disc System with Streamlined |
| Instruments, DRILL GUIDES 75 |
| Figure 4-20: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic ZEVO(TM) Anterior Cervical Plate System SLOT SCREW 75 |
| Figure 4-21: Class 2 Device Recall Vectris Trial Screening Lead Kit for Spinal Cord Stimulation 75 |
| Figure 4-22: Class 2 Device Recall Vectris Trial Screening Lead Kit for Spinal Cord Stimulation 76 |
| Figure 4-23: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic CD HORIZON Spinal System MULTIAXIAL SCREW FOR |
| 5.5/6.0MM RODS 76 |
| Figure 4-24: Class 2 Device Recall VerteLP Instrument Kit 76 |
| Figure 4-25: Class 2 Device Recall The MobiC Cervical Disc Prosthesis (MobiC; MobiC 14mm Distraction |
| Screw 77 |
| Figure 4-26: Class 2 Device Recall Lineum OCT Spine System 77 |
| Figure 4-27: Class 2 Device Recall ROSA 1.0.2 (Spine application) 77 |
| Figure 4-28: Class 2 Device Recall Polaris 5.5 Spinal System and Polaris 5.5/Cypher Spinal System 78 |
| Figure 4-29: Class 2 Device Recall Vital MIS Spinal Fixation system 78 |
| Figure 4-30: Class 2 Device Recall Lineum OCT Spine System 78 |
| Figure 4-31: Class 2 Device Recall Zimmer Biomet Vitality Spinal Fixation System 79 |
| Figure 4-32: Class 1 Device Recall SpF PLUSMini (60 A/W) Implantable Spinal Fusion Stimulator 79 |
| Figure 4-33: Comparison of Short Segment Mono-axial and Poly-axial Pedicle Screw Fixation for |
| Thoracolumbar Fractures 80 |
| Figure 4-34: Prospective Study of Fusion Rates Using Spira-C Device for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and |
| Fusion Surgery (ACDF) 81 |
| Figure 4-35: Bio2 Vitrium® Cervical Cage in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion 81 |
| Figure 4-36: SPIRA™-A 3D and HCT/p DBM vs. Medtronic Divergent™-L/Perimeter™ and Recombinant |
| BMP-2 82 |
| Figure 4-37: Retro-prospective Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of the Stand-alone Cervical |
| Interbody Cage C-CURVE (Peek and Titanium) Manufactured by MEDICREA® (C-CURVE) 82 |
| Figure 4-38: Percutaneous Screw Fixation vs. Open Fixation in the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures (PrecScrew) 83 |
| Figure 4-39: Clinical Outcome of Implant Removal Versus Retention After Posterior Fixation of |
| Thoracolumbar Fractures 84 |
| Figure 4-40: Early Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Versus Standard Conservative Treatment in |
| Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fractures (AGIL11) 84 |
| Figure 4-41: Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Using Rotary Cutter for Bone Metastases 85 |
| Figure 5-1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, Global, 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 94 |
| Figure 5-2: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Region, Global, 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 97 |
| Figure 5-3: Leading Competitors, Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, Global, 2021 107 |
| Figure 5-4: SWOT Analysis, DePuy Synthes 126 |
| Figure 5-5: SWOT Analysis, Globus Medical 127 |
| Figure 5-6: SWOT Analysis, Joimax 128 |
| Figure 5-7: SWOT Analysis, Medtronic 129 |
| Figure 5-8: SWOT Analysis, NuVasive (1 of 2) 130 |
| Figure 5-9: SWOT Analysis, NuVasive (2 of 2) 131 |
| Figure 5-10: SWOT Analysis, SI-BONE 132 |
| Figure 5-11: SWOT Analysis, Stryker (1 of 2) 133 |
| Figure 5-12: SWOT Analysis, Stryker (2 of 2) 134 |
| Figure 5-13: SWOT Analysis, VGI Medical 135 |
| Figure 5-14: SWOT Analysis, Zimmer Biomet 136 |
| Figure 6-1: MIS Interbody Device Procedures Covered 140 |
| Figure 6-2: MIS Interbody Device Markets Covered 140 |
| Figure 6-3: MIS Interbody Device Regions Covered, Global (1 of 2) 141 |
| Figure 6-4: MIS Interbody Device Regions Covered, Global (2 of 2) 142 |
| Figure 6-5: MIS Interbody Device Procedures by Segment, Global, 2018 – 2028 147 |
| Figure 6-6: MIS Interbody Device Procedures by Region, Global, 2018 – 2028 148 |
| Figure 6-7: MIS Interbody Device Procedures by Country, North America, 2018 – 2028 150 |
| Figure 6-8: MIS Interbody Device Procedures by Country, Latin America, 2018 – 2028 151 |
| Figure 6-9: MIS Interbody Device Procedures by Country, Western Europe, 2018 – 2028 152 |
| Figure 6-10: MIS Interbody Device Procedures by Country, Central & Eastern Europe, 2018 – 2028 (1 of 2) 153 |
| Figure 6-11: MIS Interbody Device Procedures by Country, Central & Eastern Europe, 2018 – 2028 (2 of 2) 154 |
| Figure 6-12: MIS Interbody Device Procedures by Country, Middle East, 2018 – 2028 155 |
| Figure 6-13: MIS Interbody Device Procedures by Country, Asia-Pacific, 2018 – 2028 (1 of 2) 156 |
| Figure 6-14: MIS Interbody Device Procedures by Country, Asia-Pacific, 2018 – 2028 (2 of 2) 157 |
| Figure 6-15: MIS Interbody Device Procedures by Country, Africa, 2018 – 2028 158 |
| Figure 6-16: MIPLIF Procedures by Region, Global, 2018 – 2028 159 |
| Figure 6-17: MIPLIF Procedures by Country, North America, 2018 – 2028 160 |
| Figure 6-18: MIPLIF Procedures by Country, Latin America, 2018 – 2028 161 |
| Figure 6-19: MIPLIF Procedures by Country, Western Europe, 2018 – 2028 162 |
| Figure 6-20: MIPLIF Procedures by Country, Central & Eastern Europe, 2018 – 2028 (1 of 2) 163 |
| Figure 6-21: MIPLIF Procedures by Country, Central & Eastern Europe, 2018 – 2028 (2 of 2) 164 |
| Figure 6-22: MIPLIF Procedures by Country, Middle East, 2018 – 2028 165 |
| Figure 6-23: MIPLIF Procedures by Country, Asia-Pacific, 2018 – 2028 (1 of 2) 166 |
| Figure 6-24: MIPLIF Procedures by Country, Asia-Pacific, 2018 – 2028 (2 of 2) 167 |
| Figure 6-25: MIPLIF Procedures by Country, Africa, 2018 – 2028 168 |
| Figure 6-26: MITLIF Procedures by Region, Global, 2018 – 2028 169 |
| Figure 6-27: MITLIF Procedures by Country, North America, 2018 – 2028 170 |
| Figure 6-28: MITLIF Procedures by Country, Latin America, 2018 – 2028 171 |
| Figure 6-29: MITLIF Procedures by Country, Western Europe, 2018 – 2028 172 |
| Figure 6-30: MITLIF Procedures by Country, Central & Eastern Europe, 2018 – 2028 (1 of 2) 173 |
| Figure 6-31: MITLIF Procedures by Country, Central & Eastern Europe, 2018 – 2028 (2 of 2) 174 |
| Figure 6-32: MITLIF Procedures by Country, Middle East, 2018 – 2028 175 |
| Figure 6-33: MITLIF Procedures by Country, Asia-Pacific, 2018 – 2028 (1 of 2) 176 |
| Figure 6-34: MITLIF Procedures by Country, Asia-Pacific, 2018 – 2028 (2 of 2) 177 |
| Figure 6-35: MITLIF Procedures by Country, Africa, 2018 – 2028 178 |
| Figure 6-36: LLIF Procedures by Region, Global, 2018 – 2028 179 |
| Figure 6-37: LLIF Procedures by Country, North America, 2018 – 2028 180 |
| Figure 6-38: LLIF Procedures by Country, Latin America, 2018 – 2028 181 |
| Figure 6-39: LLIF Procedures by Country, Western Europe, 2018 – 2028 182 |
| Figure 6-40: LLIF Procedures by Country, Central & Eastern Europe, 2018 – 2028 (1 of 2) 183 |
| Figure 6-41: LLIF Procedures by Country, Central & Eastern Europe, 2018 – 2028 (2 of 2) 184 |
| Figure 6-42: LLIF Procedures by Country, Middle East, 2018 – 2028 185 |
| Figure 6-43: LLIF Procedures by Country, Asia-Pacific, 2018 – 2028 (1 of 2) 186 |
| Figure 6-44: LLIF Procedures by Country, Asia-Pacific, 2018 – 2028 (2 of 2) 187 |
| Figure 6-45: LLIF Procedures by Country, Africa, 2018 – 2028 188 |
| Figure 6-46: OLIF Procedures by Region, Global, 2018 – 2028 189 |
| Figure 6-47: OLIF Procedures by Country, North America, 2018 – 2028 190 |
| Figure 6-48: OLIF Procedures by Country, Latin America, 2018 – 2028 191 |
| Figure 6-49: OLIF Procedures by Country, Western Europe, 2018 – 2028 192 |
| Figure 6-50: OLIF Procedures by Country, Central & Eastern Europe, 2018 – 2028 (1 of 2) 193 |
| Figure 6-51: OLIF Procedures by Country, Central & Eastern Europe, 2018 – 2028 (2 of 2) 194 |
| Figure 6-52: OLIF Procedures by Country, Middle East, 2018 – 2028 195 |
| Figure 6-53: OLIF Procedures by Country, Asia-Pacific, 2018 – 2028 (1 of 2) 196 |
| Figure 6-54: OLIF Procedures by Country, Asia-Pacific, 2018 – 2028 (2 of 2) 197 |
| Figure 6-55: OLIF Procedures by Country, Africa, 2018 – 2028 198 |
| Figure 6-56: MIS Interbody Device Market by Segment, Global, 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 200 |
| Figure 6-57: MIS Interbody Device Market by Region, Global, 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 202 |
| Figure 6-58: MIS Interbody Device Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 204 |
| Figure 6-59: Units Sold by Region, MIS Interbody Device Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 205 |
| Figure 6-60: Average Selling Price by Region, MIS Interbody Device Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 (US$) 206 |
| Figure 6-61: Market Value by Region, MIS Interbody Device Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 207 |
| Figure 6-62: MIPLIF Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 209 |
| Figure 6-63: Units Sold by Region, MIPLIF Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 210 |
| Figure 6-64: Average Selling Price by Region, MIPLIF Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 (US$) 211 |
| Figure 6-65: Market Value by Region, MIPLIF Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 212 |
| Figure 6-66: MITLIF Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 214 |
| Figure 6-67: Units Sold by Region, MITLIF Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 215 |
| Figure 6-68: Average Selling Price by Region, MITLIF Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 (US$) 216 |
| Figure 6-69: Market Value by Region, MITLIF Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 217 |
| Figure 6-70: LLIF Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 218 |
| Figure 6-71: Units Sold by Region, LLIF Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 219 |
| Figure 6-72: Average Selling Price by Region, LLIF Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 (US$) 220 |
| Figure 6-73: Market Value by Region, LLIF Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 221 |
| Figure 6-74: OLIF Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 222 |
| Figure 6-75: Units Sold by Region, OLIF Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 223 |
| Figure 6-76: Average Selling Price by Region, OLIF Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 (US$) 224 |
| Figure 6-77: Market Value by Region, OLIF Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 225 |
| Figure 6-78: Leading Competitors, MIS Interbody Device Market, Global, 2021 231 |
| Figure 7-1: MIS Pedicle Screw Regions Covered, Global (1 of 2) 236 |
| Figure 7-2: MIS Pedicle Screw Regions Covered, Global (2 of 2) 237 |
| Figure 7-3: MIS Pedicle Screw Procedures by Region, Global, 2018 – 2028 241 |
| Figure 7-4: MIS Pedicle Screw Procedures by Country, North America, 2018 – 2028 243 |
| Figure 7-5: MIS Pedicle Screw Procedures by Country, Latin America, 2018 – 2028 244 |
| Figure 7-6: MIS Pedicle Screw Procedures by Country, Western Europe, 2018 – 2028 245 |
| Figure 7-7: MIS Pedicle Screw Procedures by Country, Central & Eastern Europe, 2018 – 2028 (1 of 2) 246 |
| Figure 7-8: MIS Pedicle Screw Procedures by Country, Central & Eastern Europe, 2018 – 2028 (2 of 2) 247 |
| Figure 7-9: MIS Pedicle Screw Procedures by Country, Middle East, 2018 – 2028 248 |
| Figure 7-10: MIS Pedicle Screw Procedures by Country, Asia-Pacific, 2018 – 2028 (1 of 2) 249 |
| Figure 7-11: MIS Pedicle Screw Procedures by Country, Asia-Pacific, 2018 – 2028 (2 of 2) 250 |
| Figure 7-12: MIS Pedicle Screw Procedures by Country, Africa, 2018 – 2028 251 |
| Figure 7-13: MIS Pedicle Screw Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 253 |
| Figure 7-14: Units Sold by Region, MIS Pedicle Screw Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 255 |
| Figure 7-15: Average Selling Price by Region, MIS Pedicle Screw Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 (US$) 256 |
| Figure 7-16: Market Value by Region, MIS Pedicle Screw Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 257 |
| Figure 7-17: Leading Competitors, MIS Pedicle Screw Market, Global, 2021 263 |
| Figure 8-1: Spinous Process Fixation Regions Covered, Global (1 of 2) 268 |
| Figure 8-2: Spinous Process Fixation Regions Covered, Global (2 of 2) 269 |
| Figure 8-3: Spinous Process Fixation Procedures by Region, Global, 2018 – 2028 272 |
| Figure 8-4: Spinous Process Fixation Procedures by Country, North America, 2018 – 2028 274 |
| Figure 8-5: Spinous Process Fixation Procedures by Country, Latin America, 2018 – 2028 275 |
| Figure 8-6: Spinous Process Fixation Procedures by Country, Western Europe, 2018 – 2028 276 |
| Figure 8-7: Spinous Process Fixation Procedures by Country, Central & Eastern Europe, 2018 – 2028 (1 of |
| 2) 277 |
| Figure 8-8: Spinous Process Fixation Procedures by Country, Central & Eastern Europe, 2018 – 2028 (2 of |
| 2) 278 |
| Figure 8-9: Spinous Process Fixation Procedures by Country, Middle East, 2018 – 2028 279 |
| Figure 8-10: Spinous Process Fixation Procedures by Country, Asia-Pacific, 2018 – 2028 (1 of 2) 280 |
| Figure 8-11: Spinous Process Fixation Procedures by Country, Asia-Pacific, 2018 – 2028 (2 of 2) 281 |
| Figure 8-12: Spinous Process Fixation Procedures by Country, Africa, 2018 – 2028 282 |
| Figure 8-13: Spinous Process Fixation Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 284 |
| Figure 8-14: Units Sold by Region, Spinous Process Fixation Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 286 |
| Figure 8-15: Average Selling Price by Region, Spinous Process Fixation Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 (US$) 287 |
| Figure 8-16: Market Value by Region, Spinous Process Fixation Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 288 |
| Figure 8-17: Leading Competitors, Spinous Process Fixation Market, Global, 2021 293 |
| Figure 9-1: Facet Fixation Regions Covered, Global (1 of 2) 298 |
| Figure 9-2: Facet Fixation Regions Covered, Global (2 of 2) 299 |
| Figure 9-3: Facet Fixation Procedures by Region, Global, 2018 – 2028 302 |
| Figure 9-4: Facet Fixation Procedures by Country, North America, 2018 – 2028 304 |
| Figure 9-5: Facet Fixation Procedures by Country, Latin America, 2018 – 2028 305 |
| Figure 9-6: Facet Fixation Procedures by Country, Western Europe, 2018 – 2028 306 |
| Figure 9-7: Facet Fixation Procedures by Country, Central & Eastern Europe, 2018 – 2028 (1 of 2) 307 |
| Figure 9-8: Facet Fixation Procedures by Country, Central & Eastern Europe, 2018 – 2028 (2 of 2) 308 |
| Figure 9-9: Facet Fixation Procedures by Country, Middle East, 2018 – 2028 309 |
| Figure 9-10: Facet Fixation Procedures by Country, Asia-Pacific, 2018 – 2028 (1 of 2) 310 |
| Figure 9-11: Facet Fixation Procedures by Country, Asia-Pacific, 2018 – 2028 (2 of 2) 311 |
| Figure 9-12: Facet Fixation Procedures by Country, Africa, 2018 – 2028 312 |
| Figure 9-13: Facet Fixation Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 314 |
| Figure 9-14: Units Sold by Region, Facet Fixation Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 316 |
| Figure 9-15: Average Selling Price by Region, Facet Fixation Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 (US$) 317 |
| Figure 9-16: Market Value by Region, Facet Fixation Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 318 |
| Figure 9-17: Leading Competitors, Facet Fixation Market, Global, 2021 323 |
| Figure 10-1: Spine Endoscope Markets Covered 329 |
| Figure 10-2: Spine Endoscope Regions Covered, Global (1 of 2) 330 |
| Figure 10-3: Spine Endoscope Regions Covered, Global (2 of 2) 331 |
| Figure 10-4: Endoscopic Procedures by Region, Global, 2018 – 2028 334 |
| Figure 10-5: Endoscopic Procedures by Country, North America, 2018 – 2028 336 |
| Figure 10-6: Endoscopic Procedures by Country, Latin America, 2018 – 2028 337 |
| Figure 10-7: Endoscopic Procedures by Country, Western Europe, 2018 – 2028 338 |
| Figure 10-8: Endoscopic Procedures by Country, Central & Eastern Europe, 2018 – 2028 (1 of 2) 339 |
| Figure 10-9: Endoscopic Procedures by Country, Central & Eastern Europe, 2018 – 2028 (2 of 2) 340 |
| Figure 10-10: Endoscopic Procedures by Country, Middle East, 2018 – 2028 341 |
| Figure 10-11: Endoscopic Procedures by Country, Asia-Pacific, 2018 – 2028 (1 of 2) 342 |
| Figure 10-12: Endoscopic Procedures by Country, Asia-Pacific, 2018 – 2028 (2 of 2) 343 |
| Figure 10-13: Endoscopic Procedures by Country, Africa, 2018 – 2028 344 |
| Figure 10-14: Spine Endoscope Device Market by Segment, Global, 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 346 |
| Figure 10-15: Spine Endoscope Device Market by Region, Global, 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 348 |
| Figure 10-16: Endoscope Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 350 |
| Figure 10-17: Units Sold by Region, Endoscope Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 351 |
| Figure 10-18: Average Selling Price by Region, Endoscope Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 (US$) 352 |
| Figure 10-19: Market Value by Region, Endoscope Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 353 |
| Figure 10-20: Instrumentation Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 354 |
| Figure 10-21: Units Sold by Region, Instrumentation Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 355 |
| Figure 10-22: Average Selling Price by Region, Instrumentation Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 (US$) 356 |
| Figure 10-23: Market Value by Region, Instrumentation Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 357 |
| Figure 10-24: Leading Competitors, Spine Endoscope Market, Global, 2021 361 |
| Figure 11-1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery Instrumentation Regions Covered, Global (1 of 2) 367 |
| Figure 11-2: Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery Instrumentation Regions Covered, Global (2 of 2) 368 |
| Figure 11-3: Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery Instrumentation Market, Global, 2018 – 2028 371 |
| Figure 11-4: Units Sold by Region, Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery Instrumentation Market, Global, 2018-2028 373 |
| Figure 11-5: Average Selling Price by Region, Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery Instrumentation Market, |
| Global, 2018 – 2028 (US$) 374 |
| Figure 11-6: Market Value by Region, Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery Instrumentation Market, Global, |
| 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 375 |
| Figure 11-7: Leading Competitors, Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery Instrumentation Market, Global, 2021 381 |
iData’s 9-Step Research Methodology
Our reports follow an in-depth 9-step methodology which focuses on the following research systems:- Original primary research that consists of the most up-to-date market data
- Strong foundation of quantitative and qualitative research
- Focused on the needs and strategic challenges of the industry participants
Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection During this preliminary investigation, all staff members involved in the industry discusses the topic in detail.
Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research The first task of the research team is to prepare for the data collection process: Filing systems and relational databases are developed as needed.
Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design The core of all iData research reports is primary market research. Interviews with industry insiders represent the single most reliable way to obtain accurate, current data about market conditions, trends, threats and opportunities.
Step 4: Performing Primary Research At this stage, interviews are performed using contacts and information acquired in the secondary research phase.
Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates Following the completion of the primary research phase, the collected information must be synthesized into an accurate view of the market status. The most important question is the current state of the market.
Step 6: Market Forecast and Analysis iData Research uses a proprietary method to combine statistical data and opinions of industry experts to forecast future market values.
Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities iData analysts identify in broad terms why some companies are gaining or losing share within a given market segment.
Step 8: Final Review and Market Release An integral part of the iData research methodology is a built-in philosophy of quality control and continuing improvement is integral to the iData philosophy.
Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring iData philosophy of continuous improvement requires that reports and consulting projects be monitored after release for customer feedback and market accuracy.
Related Reports
