https://idataresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/ReportIcon-Spine-MS.jpg

Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Market Analysis, Size, Trends | United States | 2021-2027 | MedSuite | Includes: Interbody Devices, Pedicle Screws, Fixation Devices, Spinal Instruments and more

  • Year: 2021
  • Scope: 10 Years
  • Region: United States
  • Type: MedSuite

Overall, the U.S. minimally invasive spinal implants market was valued at $1.8 billion in 2020, a 6% decrease from $1.9 billion in 2019 caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The market is expected to increase over the forecast period at a CAGR of 6.5% to reach $2.7 billion in 2027. Currently, the majority of the U.S. market share is controlled by two main companies – Medtronic & NuVasive.

MIS Spinal Implants Market Trends and ForecastOne of the key drivers for the MIS spinal device market is the increase in the target population, which is composed of aging baby boomers. The majority of procedures are usually performed on individuals over the age of 60. This age group is the fastest-growing demographic cohort in the United States.

The MIS interbody market continues to see a shift toward oblique lumbar interbody (OLIF) and lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) devices and away from minimally invasive posterior interbody fusion (MIPLIF) and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MITLIF) devices. The oblique and lateral lumbar approaches are expected to see more growth than their posterior and transforaminal lumbar counterparts, although positive growth is expected across segments.

Impact of COVID-19 in the U.S. Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Market

In 2020, the U.S. market for minimally invasive spinal implants declined by over 6% when compared to 2019 as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the global market is expected to recover rapidly and surpass the pre-COVID levels by the end of 2021.

The market impact caused by COVID-19 is different by segment. The MIS interbody device segment experienced the steepest decline along with some other segments that were negatively affected by the pandemic. Meanwhile, MIS sacroiliac joint fusion is an example of a segment with high growth in spite of the negative effects of the pandemic.

Major Segments Covered in the Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Market Report Suite

While this report suite contains all data, each of the markets are also available as stand alone MedCore reports. This allows you to get access to only the research that you need. You can view all these included reports and segmentation here:

  • Procedure Numbers for Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery – MedPro: Using a number of databases, internal and external, we’re able to provide you with the total volume of procedures being performed for each of the markets mentioned in this suite of reports.
  • MIS Interbody Devices Market – MedCore: Covers segmentation in the Minimally invasive posterior lumbar interbody fusion (MIPLIF), Minimally invasive TLIF (MITLIF), lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF), and oblique lateral interbody fusion (OLIF) device markets.
  • MIS Pedicle Screws Market – MedCore: Covers segmentation in the Percutaneous MIS Systems and Retractor-Based MIS Systems device markets.
  • Spinous Process Fixation Market – MedCore: Covers several spinal fixation systems that exist for stabilizing the spine so that bony fusion can be achieved.
  • Facet Fixation Market – MedCore: Analysis of this emerging technology in the minimally invasive field.
  • MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Market – MedCore: The chapter analyzes the market for implants used to treat sacroiliac (SI) joint dysfunction.
  • Spine Endoscope Market – MedCore: The spine endoscope market analysis is broken down into two segments, endoscopes and instrumentation.
  • MIS Instrumentation Market – MedCore: This report considers instrumentation products not included in previous segments. Examples include scalpels, catheters, rongeurs, clamps, forceps, retractors and cannula, in addition to other products.

Buying all of these reports together in this suite package will provide you with substantial discounts from the separate prices. Request Pricing to Learn More

Report Data Types Included

  • Unit Sales, Average Selling Prices, Market Value & Growth Trends
  • Forecasts Until 2027, and Historical Data to 2017
  • Market Drivers & Limiters for Each Device Segment
  • Competitive Analysis with Market Shares for Each Segment
  • Procedure Volumes
  • Disease Overviews and Demographic Information
  • Company Profiles, Product Portfolios and SWOT for Top Competitors

Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Top Companies

TOP MIS Spinal Implants CompaniesMedtronic led in overall shares in the U.S. minimally invasive spine market in 2020. The company has established this role through strong performance in most segments, particularly by being the leading competitor in the MIS pedicle screw market. The company’s strong presence in the traditional spine market will continue to augment its share in the MIS market space.

NuVasive was the second-leading competitor in the U.S. minimally invasive spinal implant market in 2020, although it was previously the market leader. NuVasive has been the market leader in the MIS interbody segment, and it has held the second-leading position in the spinous process fixation segment and third-leading position in the MIS pedicle screw segment.

Other leading competitors in the U.S. include DePuy Synthes, Globus Medical, Stryker, SI-BONE, Richard Wolf, Joimax, Zimmer Biomet and others, including a large number of smaller companies. The majority of competitors in the U.S. minimally invasive spine market are small companies with market shares of 2% or less.

Research Scope Summary

Report Attribute Details
Region North America (United States)
Base Year  2020
Forecast  2021-2027
Historical Data  2017-2020
Quantitative Coverage Procedure Numbers, Market Size, Market Shares, Market Forecasts, Market Growth Rates, Units Sold, and Average Selling Prices.
Qualitative Coverage COVID-19 Impact, Market Growth Trends, Market Limiters, Competitive Analysis & SWOT for Top Competitors, Mergers & Acquisitions, Company Profiles, Product Portfolios, Disease Overviews.
Data Sources Primary Interviews with Industry Leaders, Government Physician Data, Regulatory Data, Hospital Private Data, Import & Export Data, iData Research Internal Database.

 

FREE Sample Report

TABLE of CONTENTS
List of Figures
List of Charts
executive summary
U.S. Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Overview
Competitive Analysis
Market Trends
Market Developments
Procedure Numbers
Procedure Codes Investigated
Markets Included
Key Report Updates
Version History
research methodology
Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection
Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research
Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design
Step 4: Performing Primary Research
Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates
Step 6: Market Forecast and Analysis
Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities
Step 8: Final Review and Market Release
Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring
impact of covid-19 on THE U.S. U.S. Minimally Invasive Spinal sURGERY Implant Market
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Analysis By Market Segment
2.2.1 Worst Case Scenario
2.2.2 Base Case Scenario
2.2.3 Best Case Scenario
Disease Overview
Product Assessment
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Product Portfolios
4.3 Regulatory Issues and Recalls
4.4 Clinical Trials
U.S. Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Overview
5.1 Introduction
5.1.1 Minimally Invasive Interbody Fusion
5.1.1.1 Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
5.1.1.2 Minimally Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
5.1.1.3 Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
5.1.1.4 Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion
5.1.2 Minimally Invasive Surgery Pedicle Screws
5.1.2.1 Percutaneous MIS Systems
5.1.2.2 Retractor-Based MIS Systems
5.1.3 Spinous Process Fixation
5.1.4 Facet Fixation
5.1.5 MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion
5.1.6 MIS Spine Endoscopes
5.2 Market Overview & Trend Analysis
5.3 Drivers and Limiters
5.3.1 Market Drivers
5.3.2 Market Limiters
5.4 Competitive Market Share Analysis
5.5 Mergers and Acquisitions
5.6 Company Profiles
5.7 SWOT Analysis
Procedure Numbers
6.1 Introduction
6.2 Procedures
6.2.1 Minimally Invasive Spinal Procedures
6.2.2 MIS Interbody Device Procedures
6.2.2.1 MIPLIF Procedures
6.2.2.2 MITLIF Procedures
6.2.2.3 LLIF Procedures
6.2.2.4 OLIF Procedures
6.2.3 MIS Pedicle Screw Procedures
6.2.3.1 Percutaneous Cannulated Pedicle Screw Procedures
6.2.3.2 Retractor Cannulated Pedicle Screw Procedures
6.2.3.3 Retractor Non-Cannulated Pedicle Screw Procedures
6.2.4 Spinous Process Fixation Procedures
6.2.5 Facet Fixation Procedures
6.2.6 MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Procedures
6.2.7 Spine Endoscope Procedures
MIS Interbody Device Market
7.1 Introduction
7.1.1 Approach Types
7.1.1.1 Minimally Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion
7.1.1.2 Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion
7.1.1.3 Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
7.1.1.4 Direct Lateral Interbody Fusion
7.1.1.5 eXtreme Lateral Interbody Fusion
7.1.1.6 Guided Lateral Interbody Fusion
7.1.1.7 Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion
7.2 Market Overview
7.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
7.3.1 MIS Interbody Device Market
7.3.2 MIPLIF Market
7.3.3 MITLIF Market
7.3.4 LLIF Market
7.3.5 OLIF Market
7.4 Drivers and Limiters
7.4.1 Market Drivers
7.4.2 Market Limiters
7.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis
MIS Pedicle Screw Market
8.1 Introduction
8.1.1 Percutaneous MIS Systems
8.1.2 Retractor-Based MIS Systems
8.2 Market Overview
8.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
8.3.1 MIS Pedicle Screw Market
8.3.2 Percutaneous Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market
8.3.3 Retractor Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market
8.3.4 Retractor Non-Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market
8.4 Drivers and Limiters
8.4.1 Market Drivers
8.4.2 Market Limiters
8.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis
spinous process fixation Market
9.1 Introduction
9.2 Market Analysis and Forecast
9.3 Drivers and Limiters
9.3.1 Market Drivers
9.3.2 Market Limiters
9.4 Competitive Market Share Analysis
Facet Fixation Market
10.1 Introduction
10.2 Market Analysis and Forecast
10.3 Drivers and Limiters
10.3.1 Market Drivers
10.3.2 Market Limiters
10.4 Competitive Market Share Analysis
SI Joint Fusion Market
11.1 Introduction
11.2 Market Analysis and Forecast
11.3 Drivers and Limiters
11.3.1 Market Drivers
11.3.2 Market Limiters
11.4 Competitive Market Share Analysis
Spine Endoscope Market
12.1 Introduction
12.2 Market Overview
12.3 Market Analysis and Forecast
12.3.1 Endoscope Market
12.3.2 Instrumentation Market
12.4 Drivers and Limiters
12.4.1 Market Drivers
12.4.2 Market Limiters
12.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis
Minimally invasive Spinal Surgery Instrumentation Market
13.1 Introduction
13.2 Market Analysis and Forecast
13.3 Drivers and Limiters
13.3.1 Market Drivers
13.3.2 Market Limiters
13.4 Competitive Market Share Analysis
Abbreviations
 
  Companies
·         Aesculap ·         Medtronic
·         Alevio Spine ·         Milennium Surgical Corp.
·         Alphatec Spine ·         Nexxt Spine
·         Apiary Medical ·         NuVasive
·         Atlas Spine ·         Orthofix
·         Aurora Spine ·         OsteoMed
·         Boss Instruments ·         Pinnacle Spine Group
·         Camber Spine ·         Richard Wolf
·         Captiva Spine ·         Spineology
·         Centinel Spine ·         SpineFrontier
·         Clariance ·         SeaSpine
·         CoreLink Surgical ·         SI-BONE
·         CTL Amedica ·         Spinal Elements
·         DePuy Synthes ·         Spineart
·         Eliquence ·         Stryker
·         Genesys Spine ·         Superior Surgical
·         gSource ·         Surgalign
·         Globus Medical ·         Symmetry Surgical
·         GS Medical ·         Tecomet
·         Innomed ·         Tedan Surgical Innovations
·         Integra LifeSciences ·         TranS1
·         Joimax ·         VGI Medical
·         Life Instruments ·         Xtant Medical
·         Life Spine ·         Zimmer Biomet
·         LinkBio Corp. ·         Zyga Technology
·         Medfix Instruments
Source: iData Research Inc.
Chart 1‑1: XX Market by Segment, U.S., 2020 – 2027. 2 Chart 1‑2: XX Market Overview, U.S., 2020 & 2027. 2 Chart 2‑1: Multi-Scenario XX Market Forecast, U.S., 2017 – 2027 (US$M). 29 Chart 5‑1: XX Market by Segment, U.S., 2017 – 2027. 35 Chart 5‑2: Leading Competitors, XX Market, U.S., 2020. 39 Chart 6‑1: XX Procedures by Segment, United States, 2017 – 2027. 46 Chart 7‑1: XX Market by Segment, U.S., 2017 – 2027. 51 Chart 7‑2: Leading Competitors, XX Market, U.S., 2020. 65 Chart 8‑1: XX Market by Segment, U.S., 2017 – 2027. 68 Chart 8‑2: Leading Competitors, XX Market, U.S., 2020. 78 Chart 9‑1: XX Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027. 82 Chart 9‑2: Leading Competitors, XX Market, U.S., 2020. 86
Figure 1‑1: XX Market Share Ranking by Segment, U.S., 2020. 3 Figure 1‑2: Companies Researched in this Report. 4 Figure 1‑3: Factors Impacting the XX Market by Segment, U.S. 5 Figure 1‑4: Recent Events in the XX Market, U.S., 2017 – 2020. 6 Figure 1‑5: XX Procedures Covered. 7 Figure 1‑6: Procedure Codes Investigated. 8 Figure 1‑7: XX Markets Covered. 9 Figure 1‑8: Key Report Updates. 10 Figure 1‑9: Version History. 10 Figure 2‑1: XX Market by Segment, Worst Case Scenario, U.S., 2017 – 2027 (US$M). 26 Figure 2‑2: XX Market by Segment, Base Case Scenario, U.S., 2017 – 2027 (US$M). 27 Figure 2‑3: XX Market by Segment, Best Case Scenario, U.S., 2017 – 2027 (US$M). 28 Figure 5‑1: XX Market by Segment, U.S., 2017 – 2027 (US$M). 34 Figure 5‑2: Leading Competitors, XX Market, U.S., 2020. 38 Figure 6‑1: Procedure Codes Investigated, U.S., 2020. 43 Figure 6‑2: XX Procedures by Segment, United States, 2017 – 2027. 45 Figure 6‑3: AA Procedures by Segment, U.S., 2017 – 2027. 48 Figure 7‑1: XX Market by Segment, U.S., 2017 – 2027 (US$M). 50 Figure 7‑2: XX Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027. 52 Figure 7‑3: AA Market by Segment, U.S., 2017 – 2027 (US$M). 54 Figure 7‑4: Total AA Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027. 55 Figure 7‑5: AA1 Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027. 56 Figure 7‑6: AA2 Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027. 58 Figure 7‑7: BB Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027. 60 Figure 7‑8: Leading Competitors, XX Market, U.S., 2020. 64 Figure 8‑1: XX Market by Segment, U.S., 2017 – 2027 (US$M). 67 Figure 8‑2: XX Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027. 69 Figure 8‑3: AA Market, U.S., 2017 – 2027. 71  

iData’s 9-Step Research Methodology

Our reports follow an in-depth 9-step methodology which focuses on the following research systems:

  • Original primary research that consists of the most up-to-date market data
  • Strong foundation of quantitative and qualitative research
  • Focused on the needs and strategic challenges of the industry participants

Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection During this preliminary investigation, all staff members involved in the industry discusses the topic in detail.

Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research The first task of the research team is to prepare for the data collection process: Filing systems and relational databases are developed as needed.

Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design The core of all iData research reports is primary market research. Interviews with industry insiders represent the single most reliable way to obtain accurate, current data about market conditions, trends, threats and opportunities.

Step 4: Performing Primary Research At this stage, interviews are performed using contacts and information acquired in the secondary research phase.

Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates Following the completion of the primary research phase, the collected information must be synthesized into an accurate view of the market status. The most important question is the current state of the market.

Step 6: Market Forecast and Analysis iData Research uses a proprietary method to combine statistical data and opinions of industry experts to forecast future market values.

Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities iData analysts identify in broad terms why some companies are gaining or losing share within a given market segment.

Step 8: Final Review and Market Release An integral part of the iData research methodology is a built-in philosophy of quality control and continuing improvement is integral to the iData philosophy.

Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring iData philosophy of continuous improvement requires that reports and consulting projects be monitored after release for customer feedback and market accuracy.

Click Here to Read More About Our Methodology