LIST OF FIGURES
|
| Figure 1 1: Orthopedic Large Joint Market Share Ranking by Segment, U.S., 2021 3 |
| Figure 1 2: Companies Researched in this Report 4 |
| Figure 1 3: Factors Impacting the Orthopedic Large Joint Market by Segment, U.S. 5 |
| Figure 1 4: Recent Events in the Orthopedic Large Joint Market, U.S., 2018 – 2022 6 |
| Figure 1 5: Orthopedic Large Joint Procedures Covered (1 of 3) 7 |
| Figure 1 6: Orthopedic Large Joint Procedures Covered (2 of 3) 8 |
| Figure 1 7: Orthopedic Large Joint Procedures Covered (3 of 3) 9 |
| Figure 1 8: Procedure Codes Investigated 10 |
| Figure 1 9: Orthopedic Large Joint Markets Covered (1 of 2) 11 |
| Figure 1 10: Orthopedic Large Joint Markets Covered (2 of 2) 12 |
| Figure 1 11: Key Report Updates 13 |
| Figure 1 12: Version History 13 |
| Figure 2 1: Orthopedic Large Joint Market by Segment, Worst Case Scenario, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 30 |
| Figure 2 2: Orthopedic Large Joint Market by Segment, Base Case Scenario, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 31 |
| Figure 2 3: Orthopedic Large Joint Market by Segment, Best Case Scenario, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 32 |
| Figure 4 1: Knee Arthroplasty by Company (1 of 5) 47 |
| Figure 4 2: Knee Arthroplasty by Company (2 of 5) 48 |
| Figure 4 3: Knee Arthroplasty by Company (4 of 5) 49 |
| Figure 4 4: Knee Arthroplasty by Company (5 of 5) 50 |
| Figure 4 5: Hip Arthroplasty by Company (1 of 8) 52 |
| Figure 4 6: Hip Arthroplasty by Company (2 of 8) 53 |
| Figure 4 7: Hip Arthroplasty by Company (3 of 8) 54 |
| Figure 4 8: Hip Arthroplasty by Company (4 of 8) 55 |
| Figure 4 9: Hip Arthroplasty by Company (6 of 8) 56 |
| Figure 4 10: Hip Arthroplasty by Company (7 of 8) 57 |
| Figure 4 11: Hip Arthroplasty by Company (8 of 8) 58 |
| Figure 4 12: Bone Cement by Company 61 |
| Figure 4 13: Class 2 Device Recall AS COLUMBUS CR/PS TIB.PLAT.CEMENTED 62 |
| Figure 4 14: Class 2 Device Recall TRIFIT TS 62 |
| Figure 4 15: Class 2 Device Recall Corin BIOLOX DELTA MOD HEAD 63 |
| Figure 4 16: Class 2 Device Recall ATTUNE FIXED BEARING KNEE 63 |
| Figure 4 17: Class 2 Device Recall P.F.C. SIGMA Revision Knee System Distal Augment 63 |
| Figure 4 18: Class 2 Device Recall ATTUNE Revision CRS Femoral LT SZ 5 Cemented 64 |
| Figure 4 19: Class 2 Device Recall Articul/eze Articul/eze Femoral Head 64 |
| Figure 4 20: Class 2 Device Recall Pinnacle Hip System 64 |
| Figure 4 21: Class 2 Device Recall CORAIL Cementless Femoral Stem HA Coated 65 |
| Figure 4 22: Class 2 Device Recall Truliant Splined Stem Extension 65 |
| Figure 4 23: Class 2 Device Recall The OPTETRAK Logic CC Total Knee System 65 |
| Figure 4 24: Class 2 Device Recall Truliant Tibial Fit Tray 66 |
| Figure 4 25: Class 2 Device Recall LINK STEM with Microporous Surface MP Reconstruction Prosthesis 67 |
| Figure 4 26: Class 2 Device Recall LINK BiMobile(TM) Dual Mobility System 67 |
| Figure 4 27: Class 1 Device Recall PROFEMUR Neck Long Titanium 68 |
| Figure 4 28: Class 2 Device Recall LEGION Posterior Stabilized OXINIUM Femoral Component 68 |
| Figure 4 29: Class 2 Device Recall GENESIS II Tibial Base Plate 69 |
| Figure 4 30: Class 2 Device Recall LEGION HEMI STEP TIBIAL WEDGE 69 |
| Figure 4 31: Class 2 Device Recall Journey BCS Knee System 69 |
| Figure 4 32: Class 2 Device Recall 5o (degree) GENESIS(R) II VALGUS BUSHING 70 |
| Figure 4 33: Class 2 Device Recall LEGION(R) CR XLPE HIGH LEXION Articular Insert 70 |
| Figure 4 34: Class 2 Device Recall Smith & Nephew R3 ZERO HOLE HA COATED HEMISPHERICAL STIKTITE COATED SHELL 70 |
| Figure 4 35: Class 2 Device Recall SMF STANDARD OFFSET 71 |
| Figure 4 36: Class 2 Device Recall Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Femoral Head 71 |
| Figure 4 37: Class 2 Device Recall ANTHOLOGY POROUS HIGH OFFSET STEM 71 |
| Figure 4 38: Class 2 Device Recall LEGION HK FEMORAL WEDGE 72 |
| Figure 4 39: Class 2 Device Recall VERSABOND AB 40 GRAMS FORMULATION 2 72 |
| Figure 4 40: Class 2 Device Recall NexGen, Zimmer Segmental System, Continuum Knee, Natural Knee 72 |
| Figure 4 41: Class 2 Device Recall Zimmer Biomet 73 |
| Figure 4 42: Class 2 Device Recall Vanguard Knee System PS Open Box Femoral Right, 65 mm 73 |
| Figure 4 43: Class 2 Device Recall Vanguard 360 Revision Knee System 73 |
| Figure 4 44: Class 2 Device Recall Vanguard Complete Knee System 74 |
| Figure 4 45: Class 2 Device Recall Vanguard Knee System 74 |
| Figure 4 46: Class 2 Device Recall THP Hip Plating System 74 |
| Figure 4 47: Class 2 Device Recall Bimetric, Biogroove, Mallory Head modular stem/stem, PAR5 Shell, Reach Revision stem, Recap, Taperloc 75 |
| Figure 4 48: Class 2 Device Recall FITMORE HIP STEM 75 |
| Figure 4 49: Class 2 Device Recall ECHO BiMetric Hip System 75 |
| Figure 4 50: Class 2 Device Recall Zimmer M/L Taper Hip Prosthesis 76 |
| Figure 4 51: Class 2 Device Recall Biomet Hip System 76 |
| Figure 4 52: Class 2 Device Recall Zimmer M/L Taper Hip Prosthesis, 7711 Series 77 |
| Figure 4 53: lass 2 Device Recall Trabecular Metal Primary Hip Prosthesis 77 |
| Figure 4 54: Class 2 Device Recall StageOne Hip Cement Spacer Molds 77 |
| Figure 5 1: Orthopedic Large Joint Market by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 87 |
| Figure 5 2: Leading Competitors, Orthopedic Large Joint Market, U.S., 2021 98 |
| Figure 5 3: SWOT Analysis, B. Braun (Aesculap) (1 of 2) 113 |
| Figure 5 4: SWOT Analysis, B. Braun (Aesculap) (2 of 2) 114 |
| Figure 5 5: SWOT Analysis, Corin Group 115 |
| Figure 5 6: SWOT Analysis, DePuy Synthes (1 of 2) 116 |
| Figure 5 7: SWOT Analysis, DePuy Synthes (2 of 2) 117 |
| Figure 5 8: SWOT Analysis, Heraeus 118 |
| Figure 5 9: SWOT Analysis, Kyocera Corporation 119 |
| Figure 5 10: SWOT Analysis, Microport 120 |
| Figure 5 11: SWOT Analysis, Smith & Nephew (1 of 2) 121 |
| Figure 5 12: SWOT Analysis, Smith & Nephew (2 of 2) 122 |
| Figure 5 13: SWOT Analysis, Stryker 123 |
| Figure 5 14: SWOT Analysis, Zimmer Biomet (1 of 2) 124 |
| Figure 5 15: SWOT Analysis, Zimmer Biomet (2 of 2) 125 |
| Figure 6 1: Procedure Codes Investigated, U.S., 2021 126 |
| Figure 6 2: Orthopedic Large Joint Procedures by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 127 |
| Figure 6 3: Knee Replacement Procedures by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 130 |
| Figure 6 4: Total Knee Replacement Procedures by Cementation Type, U.S., 2018 – 2028 131 |
| Figure 6 5: Total Knee Replacement Procedures by Construction Type, U.S., 2018 – 2028 132 |
| Figure 6 6: Total Knee Replacement Procedures by Bearing Type, U.S., 2018 – 2028 133 |
| Figure 6 7: Total Knee Replacement Procedures by Care Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 134 |
| Figure 6 8: Partial Knee Replacement Procedures by Device Type, U.S., 2018 – 2028 135 |
| Figure 6 9: Partial Knee Replacement Procedures by Care Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 136 |
| Figure 6 10: Knee Replacement Revision Procedures by Component, U.S., 2018 – 2028 137 |
| Figure 6 11: Knee Replacement Revision Procedures by Care Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 138 |
| Figure 6 12: Knee Cutting Block Procedures, U.S., 2018 – 2028 139 |
| Figure 6 13: Hip Replacement Procedures by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 141 |
| Figure 6 14: Total Hip Replacement Procedures by Cementation Type, U.S., 2018 – 2028 142 |
| Figure 6 15: Total Hip Replacement Procedures by Bearing Type, U.S., 2018 – 2028 143 |
| Figure 6 16: Total Hip Replacement Procedures by Care Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 144 |
| Figure 6 17: Partial Hip Replacement Procedures by Device Type, U.S., 2018 – 2028 145 |
| Figure 6 18: Partial Hip Replacement Procedures by Care Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 146 |
| Figure 6 19: Hip Resurfacing Procedures by Care Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 147 |
| Figure 6 20: Hip Replacement Revision Procedures by Component, U.S., 2018 – 2028 148 |
| Figure 6 21: Hip Replacement Revision Procedures by Care Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 149 |
| Figure 7 1: Knee Replacement Market by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 156 |
| Figure 7 2: Total Knee Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 159 |
| Figure 7 3: Total Knee Replacement Market by Cementation Type, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 160 |
| Figure 7 4: Cemented Total Knee Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 161 |
| Figure 7 5: Cementless Total Knee Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 162 |
| Figure 7 6: Hybrid Cemented Total Knee Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 163 |
| Figure 7 7: Total Knee Replacement Market by Construction Type, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 164 |
| Figure 7 8: Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 165 |
| Figure 7 9: Cruciate-Sacrificing Total Knee Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 166 |
| Figure 7 10: Total Knee Replacement Market by Bearing Type, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 167 |
| Figure 7 11: Fixed Bearing Total Knee Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 168 |
| Figure 7 12: Mobile Bearing Total Knee Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 169 |
| Figure 7 13: Total Knee Replacement Market by Care Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 170 |
| Figure 7 14: Hospital Total Knee Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 171 |
| Figure 7 15: Alternate Care Total Knee Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 172 |
| Figure 7 16: Total Partial Knee Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 173 |
| Figure 7 17: Partial Knee Replacement Market by Device Type, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 174 |
| Figure 7 18: Unicondylar Partial Knee Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 175 |
| Figure 7 19: Patellofemoral Partial Knee Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 176 |
| Figure 7 20: Partial Knee Replacement Market by Care Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 177 |
| Figure 7 21: Hospital Partial Knee Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 178 |
| Figure 7 22: Alternate Care Partial Knee Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 179 |
| Figure 7 23: Total Knee Replacement Revision Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 181 |
| Figure 7 24: Knee Replacement Revision Market by Component, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 182 |
| Figure 7 25: Complete Knee Replacement Revision Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 183 |
| Figure 7 26: Tibial Component Knee Replacement Revision Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 184 |
| Figure 7 27: Femoral Component Knee Replacement Revision Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 185 |
| Figure 7 28: Patellar Component Knee Replacement Revision Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 186 |
| Figure 7 29: Knee Replacement Revision Market by Care Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 187 |
| Figure 7 30: Hospital Knee Replacement Revision Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 188 |
| Figure 7 31: Alternate Care Knee Replacement Revision Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 189 |
| Figure 7 32: Knee Cutting Block Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 190 |
| Figure 7 33: Leading Competitors, Knee Replacement Market, U.S., 2021 200 |
| Figure 8 1: Hip Replacement Market by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 208 |
| Figure 8 2: Total Hip Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 211 |
| Figure 8 3: Total Hip Replacement Market by Cementation Type, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 213 |
| Figure 8 4: Cemented Total Hip Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 214 |
| Figure 8 5: Cementless Total Hip Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 215 |
| Figure 8 6: Hybrid Cemented Total Hip Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 216 |
| Figure 8 7: Total Hip Replacement Market by Bearing Type, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 218 |
| Figure 8 8: Metal/HCPE Total Hip Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 219 |
| Figure 8 9: Metal/Metal Total Hip Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 220 |
| Figure 8 10: Ceramic/Ceramic Total Hip Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 221 |
| Figure 8 11: Ceramic/HCPE Total Hip Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 222 |
| Figure 8 12: Total Hip Replacement Market by Care Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 223 |
| Figure 8 13: Hospital Total Hip Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 224 |
| Figure 8 14: Alternate Care Total Hip Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 225 |
| Figure 8 15: Partial Hip Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 226 |
| Figure 8 16: Partial Hip Replacement Market by Device Type, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 227 |
| Figure 8 17: Bipolar Partial Hip Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 228 |
| Figure 8 18: Unipolar Partial Hip Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 229 |
| Figure 8 19: Partial Hip Replacement Market by Care Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 230 |
| Figure 8 20: Hospital Partial Hip Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 231 |
| Figure 8 21: Alternate Care Partial Hip Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 232 |
| Figure 8 22: Hip Resurfacing Market by Care Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 233 |
| Figure 8 23: Hip Resurfacing Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 234 |
| Figure 8 24: Hospital Hip Resurfacing Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 235 |
| Figure 8 25: Alternate Care Hip Resurfacing Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 236 |
| Figure 8 26: Hip Replacement Revision Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 237 |
| Figure 8 27: Hip Replacement Revision Market by Component, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 238 |
| Figure 8 28: Complete Hip Replacement Revision Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 239 |
| Figure 8 29: Acetabular Component Hip Replacement Revision Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 240 |
| Figure 8 30: Femoral Stem Hip Replacement Revision Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 241 |
| Figure 8 31: Hip Replacement Revision Market by Care Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 242 |
| Figure 8 32: Hospital Hip Replacement Revision Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 243 |
| Figure 8 33: Alternate Care Hip Replacement Revision Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 244 |
| Figure 8 34: Leading Competitors, Hip Reconstruction Market, U.S., 2021 253 |
| Figure 9 1: Bone Cement Market by Device Type, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 257 |
| Figure 9 2: Bone Cement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 259 |
| Figure 9 3: Traditional Bone Cement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 260 |
| Figure 9 4: Premixed Antibiotic Bone Cement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 261 |
| Figure 9 5: Bone Cement Market by Care Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 262 |
| Figure 9 6: Hospital Bone Cement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 263 |
| Figure 9 7: Alternate Care Bone Cement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 264 |
| Figure 9 8: Leading Competitors, Bone Cement Market, U.S., 2021 268 |
Zimmer Biomet was the leader of the U.S. large joint devices market in 2021. Zimmer Biomet held the leading position in the knee replacement and hip replacement markets. The company also held the second position in the bone cement market.
