Large Joint Devices Market Size, Share, and COVID-19 Impact Analysis | United States | 2022-2028 | MedSuite | Includes: Hip Replacement Market, Knee Replacement Market, and 1 more
- Year: 2022
- Scope: 10 Years
- Region: United States
- Type: MedSuite
In 2021 the U.S. orthopedic large joint devices market was valued at $8.3 billion. The total market is expected to increase over the forecast period at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 2.9% to reach $10.2 billion by 2028.
The full report suite on the U.S. market for orthopedic large joint devices includes knee replacement devices, hip replacement devices and associated accessories, such as knee cutting blocks and bone cement. The report also includes a qualitative analysis of the new emerging technologies, such as robotic-assisted surgery and intelligent instrumentation.
MARKET REPORT DATA TYPES INCLUDED
- Unit Sales, Average Selling Prices, Market Value & Growth Trends
- Forecasts Until 2028, and Historical Data to 2018
- Market Drivers & Limiters for Each Segment
- Competitive Analysis with Market Shares for Each Segment
- Recent Mergers & Acquisitions
- Procedure Volumes
- Company Profiles, Product Portfolios and SWOT for Top Competitors
- COVID-19 Impact Analysis
U.S. LARGE JOINT DEVICES MARKET TRENDS
One of the major drivers of the U.S. large joint devices market is the increase in the aging U.S. population. This happens as the oldest members of the baby boomer generation are entering retirement and Medicare eligibility. Statistics indicate that the number of U.S. citizens eligible for Medicare will continue to increase over the forecast period. Additionally, The knee replacement device market captured the majority of the large joint market. This segment is expected to increase its market share over the forecast period as hip replacement and bone cement lose market share.
U.S. LARGE JOINT DEVICES MARKET SHARE INSIGHTS
Overall, within the U.S. large joints market there are three dominant competitors: Zimmer Biomet, Stryker, and DePuy Synthes.
Zimmer Biomet was the leader of the U.S. large joint devices market in 2021. Zimmer Biomet held the leading position in the knee replacement and hip replacement markets. The company also held the second position in the bone cement market.
MARKET SEGMENTATION SUMMARY
You can view all these included reports and segmentation here:
- Hip Replacement Marker – Includes:
- Total hip devices, partial hip devices, resurfacing and revision devices
- Knee Replacement Market – Includes:
- Total knee implants, partial knee implants, revision implants and cutting blocks
- Bone Cement Market — Includes:
- Traditional (non-antibiotic-containing) bone cement and premixed antibiotic bone cement
Global Research Scope Summary
| Report Attribute | Details |
|---|---|
| Regions | North America (United States) |
| Base Year | 2021 |
| Forecast | 2022-2028 |
| Historical Data | 2018-2021 |
| Quantitative Coverage | Market Size, Market Shares, Market Forecasts, Market Growth Rates, Units Sold, and Average Selling Prices. |
| Qualitative Coverage | COVID-19 Impact, Market Growth Trends, Market Limiters, Competitive Analysis & SWOT for Top Competitors, Mergers & Acquisitions, Company Profiles, Product Portfolios, FDA Recalls, Disruptive Technologies, Disease Overviews. |
| Data Sources | Primary Interviews with Industry Leaders, Government Physician Data, Regulatory Data, Hospital Private Data, Import & Export Data, iData Research Internal Database. |
TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| LIST OF FIGURES XI |
| LIST OF CHARTS XVII |
| EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 |
| U.S. ORTHOPEDIC LARGE JOINT MARKET OVERVIEW 1 |
| COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS 3 |
| MARKET TRENDS 5 |
| MARKET DEVELOPMENTS 6 |
| PROCEDURE NUMBERS 7 |
| PROCEDURE CODES INVESTIGATED 10 |
| MARKETS INCLUDED 11 |
| KEY REPORT UPDATES 13 |
| VERSION HISTORY 13 |
| RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 14 |
| Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection 14 |
| Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research 17 |
| Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design 19 |
| Step 4: Performing Primary Research 20 |
| Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates 22 |
| Step 6: Market Forecast and Analysis 23 |
| Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities 25 |
| Step 8: Final Review and Market Release 26 |
| Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring 27 |
| IMPACT OF COVID-19 ON THE U.S. ORTHOPEDIC LARGE JOINT MARKET 28 |
| 2.1 INTRODUCTION 28 |
| 2.2 ANALYSIS BY MARKET SEGMENT 30 |
| 2.2.1 Worst Case Scenario 30 |
| 2.2.2 Base Case Scenario 31 |
| 2.2.3 Best Case Scenario 32 |
| DISEASE OVERVIEW 34 |
| 3.1 BASIC ANATOMY 34 |
| 3.1.1 Knee 36 |
| 3.1.2 Hip 36 |
| 3.2 DISEASE TREATMENT AND DIAGNOSTIC 38 |
| 3.2.1 Arthritis 38 |
| 3.2.2 Osteoarthritis 38 |
| 3.2.3 Post-Traumatic Arthritis 38 |
| 3.2.4 Inflammatory Arthritis 39 |
| 3.2.5 Traumatic Injuries 39 |
| 3.2.6 Avascular Necrosis 40 |
| 3.2.7 Treatment 40 |
| 3.2.8 Complications 40 |
| 3.3 PATIENT DEMOGRAPHICS 42 |
| 3.3.1 General Statistics 42 |
| 3.3.2 Arthritis Incidence 42 |
| 3.3.3 Osteoporosis Incidence 43 |
| PRODUCT ASSESSMENT 45 |
| 4.1 INTRODUCTION 45 |
| 4.2 PRODUCT PORTFOLIOS 45 |
| 4.2.1 Knee Arthroplasty 45 |
| 4.2.1.1 Total Knee Arthroplasty 45 |
| 4.2.1.2 Partial Knee Arthroplasty 46 |
| 4.2.1.3 Knee Revision 46 |
| 4.2.1.4 Personalized Knee Implants 46 |
| 4.2.2 Hip Arthroplasty 51 |
| 4.2.2.1 Total Hip Arthroplasty 51 |
| 4.2.2.2 Hip Hemiarthroplasty 51 |
| 4.2.2.3 Hip Revision 52 |
| 4.2.3 Implant Fixation 59 |
| 4.2.3.1 Cemented Fixation 59 |
| 4.2.3.2 Cementless Fixation 60 |
| 4.2.3.3 Spacer Molds 60 |
| 4.3 REGULATORY ISSUES AND RECALLS 62 |
| 4.3.1 B. Braun 62 |
| 4.3.1.1 Knee 62 |
| 4.3.2 Corin Group 62 |
| 4.3.2.1 Hip 62 |
| 4.3.3 DePuy Synthes 63 |
| 4.3.3.1 Knee 63 |
| 4.3.3.2 Hip 64 |
| 4.3.4 Exactech 65 |
| 4.3.4.1 Knee 65 |
| 4.3.4.2 Implant Fixation 66 |
| 4.3.5 Link 67 |
| 4.3.5.1 Hip 67 |
| 4.3.6 Microport 68 |
| 4.3.6.1 Hip 68 |
| 4.3.7 Smith & Nephew 68 |
| 4.3.7.1 Knee 68 |
| 4.3.7.2 Hip 70 |
| 4.3.7.3 Implant Fixation 72 |
| 4.3.8 Zimmer Biomet 72 |
| 4.3.8.1 Knee 72 |
| 4.3.8.2 Hip 74 |
| 4.3.8.3 Implant Fixation 77 |
| U.S. ORTHOPEDIC LARGE JOINT MARKET OVERVIEW 78 |
| 5.1 INTRODUCTION 78 |
| 5.1.1 Anatomy and Pathology 78 |
| 5.1.2 Treatment 80 |
| 5.1.3 Treatment Complications 80 |
| 5.1.4 General Product Classifications 80 |
| 5.1.4.1 Total Joint Replacement 81 |
| 5.1.4.2 Partial Joint Replacement 81 |
| 5.1.4.3 Joint Resurfacing 81 |
| 5.1.4.4 Revision 81 |
| 5.1.5 Implant Wear and Durability 81 |
| 5.1.6 Patient-Specific Products and Consumer Awareness 82 |
| 5.1.7 Press-Fitted versus Cemented Implantation 82 |
| 5.1.8 Simultaneous Bilateral Implantation 83 |
| 5.1.9 Minimally Invasive Surgery 83 |
| 5.1.10 New Technologies in Orthopedics 83 |
| 5.1.11 Emerging Non-Surgical Alternatives 84 |
| 5.2 MARKET OVERVIEW & TREND ANALYSIS 86 |
| 5.3 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 89 |
| 5.3.1 Market Drivers 89 |
| 5.3.2 Market Limiters 91 |
| 5.4 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 93 |
| 5.5 MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS 100 |
| 5.6 COMPANY PROFILES 102 |
| 5.6.1 B. Braun 102 |
| 5.6.1.1 Aesculap 102 |
| 5.6.2 Corin Group 103 |
| 5.6.3 DePuy Synthes 104 |
| 5.6.4 Heraeus 105 |
| 5.6.5 Kyocera Corporation 106 |
| 5.6.6 Microport 107 |
| 5.6.7 Smith & Nephew 108 |
| 5.6.8 Stryker 109 |
| 5.6.9 Zimmer Biomet 110 |
| 5.6.9.1 Zimmer 110 |
| 5.6.9.2 Biomet 110 |
| 5.6.9.3 Biomet 3i 111 |
| 5.7 SWOT ANALYSIS 112 |
| 5.7.1 B. Braun 113 |
| 5.7.2 Corin Group 115 |
| 5.7.3 DePuy Synthes 116 |
| 5.7.4 Heraeus 118 |
| 5.7.5 Kyocera Corporation 119 |
| 5.7.6 Microport 120 |
| 5.7.7 Smith & Nephew 121 |
| 5.7.8 Stryker 123 |
| 5.7.9 Zimmer Biomet 124 |
| PROCEDURE NUMBERS 126 |
| 6.1 INTRODUCTION 126 |
| 6.2 PROCEDURES 127 |
| 6.2.1 Knee Replacement Procedures 129 |
| 6.2.1.1 Total Knee Replacement Procedures 131 |
| 6.2.1.1.1 Total Knee Replacement Procedures by Cementation Type 131 |
| 6.2.1.1.2 Total Knee Replacement Procedures by Construction Type 132 |
| 6.2.1.1.3 Total Knee Replacement Procedures by Bearing Type 133 |
| 6.2.1.1.4 Total Knee Replacement Procedures by Care Setting 134 |
| 6.2.1.2 Partial Knee Replacement Procedures 135 |
| 6.2.1.2.1 Partial Knee Replacement Procedures by Device Type 135 |
| 6.2.1.2.2 Partial Knee Replacement Procedures by Care Setting 136 |
| 6.2.1.3 Knee Replacement Revision Procedures 137 |
| 6.2.1.3.1 Knee Replacement Revision Procedures by Component 137 |
| 6.2.1.3.2 Knee Replacement Revision Procedures by Care Setting 138 |
| 6.2.1.4 Knee Replacement Procedures Using Cutting Blocks 139 |
| 6.2.2 Hip Replacement Procedures 140 |
| 6.2.2.1 Total Hip Replacement Procedures 142 |
| 6.2.2.1.1 Total Hip Replacement Procedures by Cementation Type 142 |
| 6.2.2.1.2 Total Hip Replacement Procedures by Bearing Type 143 |
| 6.2.2.1.3 Total Hip Replacement Procedures by Care Setting 144 |
| 6.2.2.2 Partial Hip Replacement Procedures 145 |
| 6.2.2.2.1 Partial Hip Replacement Procedures by Device Type 145 |
| 6.2.2.2.2 Partial Hip Replacement Procedures by Care Setting 146 |
| 6.2.2.3 Hip Resurfacing Procedures 147 |
| 6.2.2.4 Hip Replacement Revision Procedures 148 |
| 6.2.2.4.1 Hip Replacement Revision Procedures by Component 148 |
| 6.2.2.4.2 Hip Replacement Revision Procedures by Care Setting 149 |
| KNEE REPLACEMENT MARKET 150 |
| 7.1 INTRODUCTION 150 |
| 7.1.1 Anatomy 150 |
| 7.1.2 Pathology 150 |
| 7.1.3 Treatment 150 |
| 7.1.4 Implant Types 151 |
| 7.1.4.1 Total Knee Replacement 151 |
| 7.1.4.2 Partial Knee Replacement 151 |
| 7.1.4.3 Patellofemoral Replacement 151 |
| 7.1.4.4 Knee Revision 151 |
| 7.1.5 Fixation Method 152 |
| 7.1.6 Bearing Surface 152 |
| 7.1.7 Fixed versus Mobile Bearings 152 |
| 7.1.8 Cruciate-Retaining versus Posterior-Stabilized (Cruciate-Sacrificing) 153 |
| 7.1.9 Custom and Personalized Solutions 153 |
| 7.1.10 Robotic Technology in Knee Arthroplasty 154 |
| 7.2 MARKET OVERVIEW 155 |
| 7.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 158 |
| 7.3.1 Total Knee Replacement Market 158 |
| 7.3.1.1 Total Knee Replacement Market by Cementation Type 160 |
| 7.3.1.1.1 Cemented Total Knee Replacement Market 161 |
| 7.3.1.1.2 Cementless Total Knee Replacement Market 162 |
| 7.3.1.1.3 Hybrid Cemented Total Knee Replacement Market 163 |
| 7.3.1.2 Total Knee Replacement Market by Construction Type 164 |
| 7.3.1.2.1 Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Replacement Market 165 |
| 7.3.1.2.2 Cruciate-Sacrificing Total Knee Replacement Market 166 |
| 7.3.1.3 Total Knee Replacement Market by Bearing Type 167 |
| 7.3.1.3.1 Fixed Bearing Total Knee Replacement Market 168 |
| 7.3.1.3.2 Mobile Bearing Total Knee Replacement Market 169 |
| 7.3.1.4 Total Knee Replacement Market by Care Setting 170 |
| 7.3.1.4.1 Hospital Total Knee Replacement Market 171 |
| 7.3.1.4.2 Alternate Care Total Knee Replacement Market 172 |
| 7.3.2 Partial Knee Replacement Market 173 |
| 7.3.2.1 Partial Knee Replacement Market by Device Type 174 |
| 7.3.2.1.1 Unicondylar Partial Knee Replacement Market 175 |
| 7.3.2.1.2 Patellofemoral Partial Knee Replacement Market 176 |
| 7.3.2.2 Partial Knee Replacement Market by Care Setting 177 |
| 7.3.2.2.1 Hospital Partial Knee Replacement Market 178 |
| 7.3.2.2.2 Alternate Care Partial Knee Replacement Market 179 |
| 7.3.3 Knee Replacement Revision Market 180 |
| 7.3.3.1 Knee Replacement Revision Market by Component 182 |
| 7.3.3.1.1 Complete Knee Replacement Revision Market 183 |
| 7.3.3.1.2 Tibial Component Knee Replacement Revision Market 184 |
| 7.3.3.1.3 Femoral Component Knee Replacement Revision Market 185 |
| 7.3.3.1.4 Patellar Component Knee Replacement Revision Market 186 |
| 7.3.3.2 Knee Replacement Revision Market by Care Setting 187 |
| 7.3.3.2.1 Hospital Knee Replacement Revision Market 188 |
| 7.3.3.2.2 Alternate Care Knee Replacement Revision Market 189 |
| 7.3.4 Knee Cutting Block Market 190 |
| 7.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 191 |
| 7.4.1 Market Drivers 191 |
| 7.4.2 Market Limiters 193 |
| 7.5 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 195 |
| HIP REPLACEMENT MARKET 202 |
| 8.1 INTRODUCTION 202 |
| 8.1.1 Anatomy 202 |
| 8.1.2 Pathology 202 |
| 8.1.3 Treatment 202 |
| 8.1.4 Implant Types 202 |
| 8.1.4.1 Total Hip Joint Replacement 202 |
| 8.1.4.2 Partial Hip Joint Replacement 203 |
| 8.1.4.3 Resurfacing Hip Joint Replacement 203 |
| 8.1.4.4 Revision Hip Joint Replacement 203 |
| 8.1.5 Fixation Method 204 |
| 8.1.6 Implant Material 204 |
| 8.1.7 Bearing Surface Technology 204 |
| 8.1.7.1 Polyethylene Bearings 204 |
| 8.1.7.2 Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene Bearings 204 |
| 8.1.7.3 Metal Bearings 205 |
| 8.1.7.4 Ceramic Bearings 205 |
| 8.1.8 Emerging Technologies 205 |
| 8.2 MARKET OVERVIEW 207 |
| 8.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 210 |
| 8.3.1 Total Hip Replacement Market 210 |
| 8.3.1.1 Total Hip Replacement Market by Cementation Type 212 |
| 8.3.1.1.1 Cemented Total Hip Replacement Market 214 |
| 8.3.1.1.2 Cementless Total Hip Replacement Market 215 |
| 8.3.1.1.3 Hybrid Cemented Total Hip Replacement Market 216 |
| 8.3.1.2 Total Hip Replacement Market by Bearing Type 217 |
| 8.3.1.2.1 Metal/HCPE Total Hip Replacement Market 219 |
| 8.3.1.2.2 Metal/Metal Total Hip Replacement Market 220 |
| 8.3.1.2.3 Ceramic/Ceramic Total Hip Replacement Market 221 |
| 8.3.1.2.4 Ceramic/HCPE Total Hip Replacement Market 222 |
| 8.3.1.3 Total Hip Replacement Market by Care Setting 223 |
| 8.3.1.3.1 Hospital Total Hip Replacement Market 224 |
| 8.3.1.3.2 Alternate Care Total Hip Replacement Market 225 |
| 8.3.2 Partial Hip Replacement Market 226 |
| 8.3.2.1 Partial Hip Replacement Market by Device Type 227 |
| 8.3.2.1.1 Bipolar Partial Hip Replacement Market 228 |
| 8.3.2.1.2 Unipolar Partial Hip Replacement Market 229 |
| 8.3.2.2 Partial Hip Replacement Market by Care Setting 230 |
| 8.3.2.2.1 Hospital Partial Hip Replacement Market 231 |
| 8.3.2.2.2 Alternate Care Partial Hip Replacement Market 232 |
| 8.3.3 Hip Resurfacing Market 233 |
| 8.3.3.1 Hospital Hip Resurfacing Market 235 |
| 8.3.3.2 Alternate Care Hip Resurfacing Market 236 |
| 8.3.4 Hip Replacement Revision Market 237 |
| 8.3.4.1 Hip Replacement Revision Market by Component 238 |
| 8.3.4.1.1 Complete Hip Replacement Revision Market 239 |
| 8.3.4.1.2 Acetabular Component Hip Replacement Revision Market 240 |
| 8.3.4.1.3 Femoral Stem Hip Replacement Revision Market 241 |
| 8.3.4.2 Hip Replacement Revision Market by Care Setting 242 |
| 8.3.4.2.1 Hospital Hip Replacement Revision Market 243 |
| 8.3.4.2.2 Alternate Care Hip Replacement Revision Market 244 |
| 8.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 245 |
| 8.4.1 Market Drivers 245 |
| 8.4.2 Market Limiters 247 |
| 8.5 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 249 |
| BONE CEMENT MARKET 255 |
| 9.1 INTRODUCTION 255 |
| 9.1.1 Antibiotic Usage 255 |
| 9.1.2 Increased Popularity of Cementless Implants 256 |
| 9.1.3 Spacer Molds for Joint Revision 256 |
| 9.2 MARKET OVERVIEW 257 |
| 9.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 259 |
| 9.3.1 Bone Cement Market by Device Type 259 |
| 9.3.1.1 Traditional Bone Cement Market 260 |
| 9.3.1.2 Premixed Antibiotic Bone Cement Market 261 |
| 9.3.2 Bone Cement Market by Care Setting 262 |
| 9.3.2.1 Hospital Bone Cement Market 263 |
| 9.3.2.2 Alternate Care Bone Cement Market 264 |
| 9.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 265 |
| 9.4.1 Market Drivers 265 |
| 9.4.2 Market Limiters 265 |
| 9.5 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 267 |
| ABBREVIATIONS 270 |
Companies Included |
| Zimmer Biomet |
| Stryker |
| DePuy Synthes |
| Smith & Nephew |
| Colfax Corporation |
| MicroPort |
| Exactech |
| Heraeus |
| Others |
LIST OF CHARTS |
| Chart 1 1: Orthopedic Large Joint Market by Segment, U.S., 2021 – 2028 2 |
| Chart 1 2: Orthopedic Large Joint Market Overview, U.S., 2021 & 2028 2 |
| Chart 2 1: Multi-Scenario Orthopedic Large Joint Market Forecast, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 33 |
| Chart 5 1: Orthopedic Large Joint Market by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 88 |
| Chart 5 2: Leading Competitors, Orthopedic Large Joint Market, U.S., 2021 99 |
| Chart 6 1: Orthopedic Large Joint Procedures by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 128 |
| Chart 7 1: Knee Replacement Market by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 157 |
| Chart 7 2: Leading Competitors, Knee Replacement Market, U.S., 2021 201 |
| Chart 8 1: Hip Replacement Market by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 209 |
| Chart 8 2: Leading Competitors, Hip Reconstruction Market, U.S., 2021 254 |
| Chart 9 1: Bone Cement Market by Device Type, U.S., 2018 – 2028 258 |
| Chart 9 2: Leading Competitors, Bone Cement Market, U.S., 2021 269 |
LIST OF FIGURES |
| Figure 1 1: Orthopedic Large Joint Market Share Ranking by Segment, U.S., 2021 3 |
| Figure 1 2: Companies Researched in this Report 4 |
| Figure 1 3: Factors Impacting the Orthopedic Large Joint Market by Segment, U.S. 5 |
| Figure 1 4: Recent Events in the Orthopedic Large Joint Market, U.S., 2018 – 2022 6 |
| Figure 1 5: Orthopedic Large Joint Procedures Covered (1 of 3) 7 |
| Figure 1 6: Orthopedic Large Joint Procedures Covered (2 of 3) 8 |
| Figure 1 7: Orthopedic Large Joint Procedures Covered (3 of 3) 9 |
| Figure 1 8: Procedure Codes Investigated 10 |
| Figure 1 9: Orthopedic Large Joint Markets Covered (1 of 2) 11 |
| Figure 1 10: Orthopedic Large Joint Markets Covered (2 of 2) 12 |
| Figure 1 11: Key Report Updates 13 |
| Figure 1 12: Version History 13 |
| Figure 2 1: Orthopedic Large Joint Market by Segment, Worst Case Scenario, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 30 |
| Figure 2 2: Orthopedic Large Joint Market by Segment, Base Case Scenario, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 31 |
| Figure 2 3: Orthopedic Large Joint Market by Segment, Best Case Scenario, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 32 |
| Figure 4 1: Knee Arthroplasty by Company (1 of 5) 47 |
| Figure 4 2: Knee Arthroplasty by Company (2 of 5) 48 |
| Figure 4 3: Knee Arthroplasty by Company (4 of 5) 49 |
| Figure 4 4: Knee Arthroplasty by Company (5 of 5) 50 |
| Figure 4 5: Hip Arthroplasty by Company (1 of 8) 52 |
| Figure 4 6: Hip Arthroplasty by Company (2 of 8) 53 |
| Figure 4 7: Hip Arthroplasty by Company (3 of 8) 54 |
| Figure 4 8: Hip Arthroplasty by Company (4 of 8) 55 |
| Figure 4 9: Hip Arthroplasty by Company (6 of 8) 56 |
| Figure 4 10: Hip Arthroplasty by Company (7 of 8) 57 |
| Figure 4 11: Hip Arthroplasty by Company (8 of 8) 58 |
| Figure 4 12: Bone Cement by Company 61 |
| Figure 4 13: Class 2 Device Recall AS COLUMBUS CR/PS TIB.PLAT.CEMENTED 62 |
| Figure 4 14: Class 2 Device Recall TRIFIT TS 62 |
| Figure 4 15: Class 2 Device Recall Corin BIOLOX DELTA MOD HEAD 63 |
| Figure 4 16: Class 2 Device Recall ATTUNE FIXED BEARING KNEE 63 |
| Figure 4 17: Class 2 Device Recall P.F.C. SIGMA Revision Knee System Distal Augment 63 |
| Figure 4 18: Class 2 Device Recall ATTUNE Revision CRS Femoral LT SZ 5 Cemented 64 |
| Figure 4 19: Class 2 Device Recall Articul/eze Articul/eze Femoral Head 64 |
| Figure 4 20: Class 2 Device Recall Pinnacle Hip System 64 |
| Figure 4 21: Class 2 Device Recall CORAIL Cementless Femoral Stem HA Coated 65 |
| Figure 4 22: Class 2 Device Recall Truliant Splined Stem Extension 65 |
| Figure 4 23: Class 2 Device Recall The OPTETRAK Logic CC Total Knee System 65 |
| Figure 4 24: Class 2 Device Recall Truliant Tibial Fit Tray 66 |
| Figure 4 25: Class 2 Device Recall LINK STEM with Microporous Surface MP Reconstruction Prosthesis 67 |
| Figure 4 26: Class 2 Device Recall LINK BiMobile(TM) Dual Mobility System 67 |
| Figure 4 27: Class 1 Device Recall PROFEMUR Neck Long Titanium 68 |
| Figure 4 28: Class 2 Device Recall LEGION Posterior Stabilized OXINIUM Femoral Component 68 |
| Figure 4 29: Class 2 Device Recall GENESIS II Tibial Base Plate 69 |
| Figure 4 30: Class 2 Device Recall LEGION HEMI STEP TIBIAL WEDGE 69 |
| Figure 4 31: Class 2 Device Recall Journey BCS Knee System 69 |
| Figure 4 32: Class 2 Device Recall 5o (degree) GENESIS(R) II VALGUS BUSHING 70 |
| Figure 4 33: Class 2 Device Recall LEGION(R) CR XLPE HIGH LEXION Articular Insert 70 |
| Figure 4 34: Class 2 Device Recall Smith & Nephew R3 ZERO HOLE HA COATED HEMISPHERICAL STIKTITE COATED SHELL 70 |
| Figure 4 35: Class 2 Device Recall SMF STANDARD OFFSET 71 |
| Figure 4 36: Class 2 Device Recall Birmingham Hip Resurfacing Femoral Head 71 |
| Figure 4 37: Class 2 Device Recall ANTHOLOGY POROUS HIGH OFFSET STEM 71 |
| Figure 4 38: Class 2 Device Recall LEGION HK FEMORAL WEDGE 72 |
| Figure 4 39: Class 2 Device Recall VERSABOND AB 40 GRAMS FORMULATION 2 72 |
| Figure 4 40: Class 2 Device Recall NexGen, Zimmer Segmental System, Continuum Knee, Natural Knee 72 |
| Figure 4 41: Class 2 Device Recall Zimmer Biomet 73 |
| Figure 4 42: Class 2 Device Recall Vanguard Knee System PS Open Box Femoral Right, 65 mm 73 |
| Figure 4 43: Class 2 Device Recall Vanguard 360 Revision Knee System 73 |
| Figure 4 44: Class 2 Device Recall Vanguard Complete Knee System 74 |
| Figure 4 45: Class 2 Device Recall Vanguard Knee System 74 |
| Figure 4 46: Class 2 Device Recall THP Hip Plating System 74 |
| Figure 4 47: Class 2 Device Recall Bimetric, Biogroove, Mallory Head modular stem/stem, PAR5 Shell, Reach Revision stem, Recap, Taperloc 75 |
| Figure 4 48: Class 2 Device Recall FITMORE HIP STEM 75 |
| Figure 4 49: Class 2 Device Recall ECHO BiMetric Hip System 75 |
| Figure 4 50: Class 2 Device Recall Zimmer M/L Taper Hip Prosthesis 76 |
| Figure 4 51: Class 2 Device Recall Biomet Hip System 76 |
| Figure 4 52: Class 2 Device Recall Zimmer M/L Taper Hip Prosthesis, 7711 Series 77 |
| Figure 4 53: lass 2 Device Recall Trabecular Metal Primary Hip Prosthesis 77 |
| Figure 4 54: Class 2 Device Recall StageOne Hip Cement Spacer Molds 77 |
| Figure 5 1: Orthopedic Large Joint Market by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 87 |
| Figure 5 2: Leading Competitors, Orthopedic Large Joint Market, U.S., 2021 98 |
| Figure 5 3: SWOT Analysis, B. Braun (Aesculap) (1 of 2) 113 |
| Figure 5 4: SWOT Analysis, B. Braun (Aesculap) (2 of 2) 114 |
| Figure 5 5: SWOT Analysis, Corin Group 115 |
| Figure 5 6: SWOT Analysis, DePuy Synthes (1 of 2) 116 |
| Figure 5 7: SWOT Analysis, DePuy Synthes (2 of 2) 117 |
| Figure 5 8: SWOT Analysis, Heraeus 118 |
| Figure 5 9: SWOT Analysis, Kyocera Corporation 119 |
| Figure 5 10: SWOT Analysis, Microport 120 |
| Figure 5 11: SWOT Analysis, Smith & Nephew (1 of 2) 121 |
| Figure 5 12: SWOT Analysis, Smith & Nephew (2 of 2) 122 |
| Figure 5 13: SWOT Analysis, Stryker 123 |
| Figure 5 14: SWOT Analysis, Zimmer Biomet (1 of 2) 124 |
| Figure 5 15: SWOT Analysis, Zimmer Biomet (2 of 2) 125 |
| Figure 6 1: Procedure Codes Investigated, U.S., 2021 126 |
| Figure 6 2: Orthopedic Large Joint Procedures by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 127 |
| Figure 6 3: Knee Replacement Procedures by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 130 |
| Figure 6 4: Total Knee Replacement Procedures by Cementation Type, U.S., 2018 – 2028 131 |
| Figure 6 5: Total Knee Replacement Procedures by Construction Type, U.S., 2018 – 2028 132 |
| Figure 6 6: Total Knee Replacement Procedures by Bearing Type, U.S., 2018 – 2028 133 |
| Figure 6 7: Total Knee Replacement Procedures by Care Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 134 |
| Figure 6 8: Partial Knee Replacement Procedures by Device Type, U.S., 2018 – 2028 135 |
| Figure 6 9: Partial Knee Replacement Procedures by Care Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 136 |
| Figure 6 10: Knee Replacement Revision Procedures by Component, U.S., 2018 – 2028 137 |
| Figure 6 11: Knee Replacement Revision Procedures by Care Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 138 |
| Figure 6 12: Knee Cutting Block Procedures, U.S., 2018 – 2028 139 |
| Figure 6 13: Hip Replacement Procedures by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 141 |
| Figure 6 14: Total Hip Replacement Procedures by Cementation Type, U.S., 2018 – 2028 142 |
| Figure 6 15: Total Hip Replacement Procedures by Bearing Type, U.S., 2018 – 2028 143 |
| Figure 6 16: Total Hip Replacement Procedures by Care Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 144 |
| Figure 6 17: Partial Hip Replacement Procedures by Device Type, U.S., 2018 – 2028 145 |
| Figure 6 18: Partial Hip Replacement Procedures by Care Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 146 |
| Figure 6 19: Hip Resurfacing Procedures by Care Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 147 |
| Figure 6 20: Hip Replacement Revision Procedures by Component, U.S., 2018 – 2028 148 |
| Figure 6 21: Hip Replacement Revision Procedures by Care Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 149 |
| Figure 7 1: Knee Replacement Market by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 156 |
| Figure 7 2: Total Knee Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 159 |
| Figure 7 3: Total Knee Replacement Market by Cementation Type, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 160 |
| Figure 7 4: Cemented Total Knee Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 161 |
| Figure 7 5: Cementless Total Knee Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 162 |
| Figure 7 6: Hybrid Cemented Total Knee Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 163 |
| Figure 7 7: Total Knee Replacement Market by Construction Type, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 164 |
| Figure 7 8: Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 165 |
| Figure 7 9: Cruciate-Sacrificing Total Knee Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 166 |
| Figure 7 10: Total Knee Replacement Market by Bearing Type, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 167 |
| Figure 7 11: Fixed Bearing Total Knee Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 168 |
| Figure 7 12: Mobile Bearing Total Knee Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 169 |
| Figure 7 13: Total Knee Replacement Market by Care Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 170 |
| Figure 7 14: Hospital Total Knee Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 171 |
| Figure 7 15: Alternate Care Total Knee Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 172 |
| Figure 7 16: Total Partial Knee Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 173 |
| Figure 7 17: Partial Knee Replacement Market by Device Type, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 174 |
| Figure 7 18: Unicondylar Partial Knee Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 175 |
| Figure 7 19: Patellofemoral Partial Knee Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 176 |
| Figure 7 20: Partial Knee Replacement Market by Care Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 177 |
| Figure 7 21: Hospital Partial Knee Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 178 |
| Figure 7 22: Alternate Care Partial Knee Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 179 |
| Figure 7 23: Total Knee Replacement Revision Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 181 |
| Figure 7 24: Knee Replacement Revision Market by Component, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 182 |
| Figure 7 25: Complete Knee Replacement Revision Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 183 |
| Figure 7 26: Tibial Component Knee Replacement Revision Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 184 |
| Figure 7 27: Femoral Component Knee Replacement Revision Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 185 |
| Figure 7 28: Patellar Component Knee Replacement Revision Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 186 |
| Figure 7 29: Knee Replacement Revision Market by Care Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 187 |
| Figure 7 30: Hospital Knee Replacement Revision Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 188 |
| Figure 7 31: Alternate Care Knee Replacement Revision Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 189 |
| Figure 7 32: Knee Cutting Block Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 190 |
| Figure 7 33: Leading Competitors, Knee Replacement Market, U.S., 2021 200 |
| Figure 8 1: Hip Replacement Market by Segment, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 208 |
| Figure 8 2: Total Hip Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 211 |
| Figure 8 3: Total Hip Replacement Market by Cementation Type, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 213 |
| Figure 8 4: Cemented Total Hip Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 214 |
| Figure 8 5: Cementless Total Hip Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 215 |
| Figure 8 6: Hybrid Cemented Total Hip Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 216 |
| Figure 8 7: Total Hip Replacement Market by Bearing Type, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 218 |
| Figure 8 8: Metal/HCPE Total Hip Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 219 |
| Figure 8 9: Metal/Metal Total Hip Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 220 |
| Figure 8 10: Ceramic/Ceramic Total Hip Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 221 |
| Figure 8 11: Ceramic/HCPE Total Hip Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 222 |
| Figure 8 12: Total Hip Replacement Market by Care Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 223 |
| Figure 8 13: Hospital Total Hip Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 224 |
| Figure 8 14: Alternate Care Total Hip Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 225 |
| Figure 8 15: Partial Hip Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 226 |
| Figure 8 16: Partial Hip Replacement Market by Device Type, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 227 |
| Figure 8 17: Bipolar Partial Hip Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 228 |
| Figure 8 18: Unipolar Partial Hip Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 229 |
| Figure 8 19: Partial Hip Replacement Market by Care Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 230 |
| Figure 8 20: Hospital Partial Hip Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 231 |
| Figure 8 21: Alternate Care Partial Hip Replacement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 232 |
| Figure 8 22: Hip Resurfacing Market by Care Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 233 |
| Figure 8 23: Hip Resurfacing Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 234 |
| Figure 8 24: Hospital Hip Resurfacing Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 235 |
| Figure 8 25: Alternate Care Hip Resurfacing Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 236 |
| Figure 8 26: Hip Replacement Revision Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 237 |
| Figure 8 27: Hip Replacement Revision Market by Component, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 238 |
| Figure 8 28: Complete Hip Replacement Revision Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 239 |
| Figure 8 29: Acetabular Component Hip Replacement Revision Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 240 |
| Figure 8 30: Femoral Stem Hip Replacement Revision Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 241 |
| Figure 8 31: Hip Replacement Revision Market by Care Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 242 |
| Figure 8 32: Hospital Hip Replacement Revision Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 243 |
| Figure 8 33: Alternate Care Hip Replacement Revision Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 244 |
| Figure 8 34: Leading Competitors, Hip Reconstruction Market, U.S., 2021 253 |
| Figure 9 1: Bone Cement Market by Device Type, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 257 |
| Figure 9 2: Bone Cement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 259 |
| Figure 9 3: Traditional Bone Cement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 260 |
| Figure 9 4: Premixed Antibiotic Bone Cement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 261 |
| Figure 9 5: Bone Cement Market by Care Setting, U.S., 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 262 |
| Figure 9 6: Hospital Bone Cement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 263 |
| Figure 9 7: Alternate Care Bone Cement Market, U.S., 2018 – 2028 264 |
| Figure 9 8: Leading Competitors, Bone Cement Market, U.S., 2021 268 |
iData’s 9-Step Research Methodology
Our reports follow an in-depth 9-step methodology which focuses on the following research systems:- Original primary research that consists of the most up-to-date market data
- Strong foundation of quantitative and qualitative research
- Focused on the needs and strategic challenges of the industry participants
Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection During this preliminary investigation, all staff members involved in the industry discusses the topic in detail.
Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research The first task of the research team is to prepare for the data collection process: Filing systems and relational databases are developed as needed.
Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design The core of all iData research reports is primary market research. Interviews with industry insiders represent the single most reliable way to obtain accurate, current data about market conditions, trends, threats and opportunities.
Step 4: Performing Primary Research At this stage, interviews are performed using contacts and information acquired in the secondary research phase.
Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates Following the completion of the primary research phase, the collected information must be synthesized into an accurate view of the market status. The most important question is the current state of the market.
Step 6: Market Forecast and Analysis iData Research uses a proprietary method to combine statistical data and opinions of industry experts to forecast future market values.
Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities iData analysts identify in broad terms why some companies are gaining or losing share within a given market segment.
Step 8: Final Review and Market Release An integral part of the iData research methodology is a built-in philosophy of quality control and continuing improvement is integral to the iData philosophy.
Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring iData philosophy of continuous improvement requires that reports and consulting projects be monitored after release for customer feedback and market accuracy.
Explore Options
| Report Summary | FREE |
Large Joint Devices Market Size, Share, and COVID-19 Impact Analysis | United States | 2022-2028 | MedSuite | Includes: Hip Replacement Market, Knee Replacement Market, and 1 more
$295 – $9,995
The full report suite on the U.S. market for orthopedic large joint devices includes knee reconstruction devices, hip reconstruction devices and associated accessories such as knee cutting blocks and bone cement. The report also includes a market overview for the new emerging technologies such as robotic-assisted surgery and intelligent instrumentation.
- 2022
- 10 Years
- United States
- MedSuite
Related Reports
