https://idataresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/E01F7CEF-3014-4819-B4BB-74C01A80CB63.jpeg

Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Size, Share & COVID-19 Impact Analysis | South Korea | 2022-2028 | MedSuite | Includes: Interbody Spinal Surgery Devices, Pedicle Screws, and 4 more

  • Year: 2022
  • Scope: 10 Years
  • Region: South Korea
  • Type: MedSuite

South Korea’s minimally invasive spinal implant market was valued at $69 million in 2021. This is expected to increase over the forecast period at a CAGR of 10.9% to reach $142 million.

The full report suite on the South Korea market for minimally invasive spinal implants includes minimally invasive spinal (MIS) interbody devices, MIS pedicle screws, spinous process fixation, SI joint fusion, spine endoscopes, spine endoscope and MIS surgical instrumentation.

MARKET REPORT DATA TYPES INCLUDED

  • Unit Sales, Average Selling Prices, Market Value & Growth Trends
  • Forecasts Until 2028, and Historical Data to 2018
  • Market Drivers & Limiters for Each Segment
  • Competitive Analysis with Market Shares for Each Segment
  • Recent Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Procedure Volumes
  • Company Profiles, Product Portfolios and SWOT for Top Competitors
  • COVID-19 Impact Analysis

COVID-19 IMPACT ANALYSIS ON THE SOUTH KOREAN MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL IMPLANTS MARKET

During 2020, the strain on South Korea’s hospital system remained low, due to public health measures, which included enforced mask wearing, retrospectively identifying potential causes and tracking infection paths. While the hospital and healthcare systems did not experience the same collapse that was experienced in many other countries, South Korea did experience a reduction in procedures performed as healthcare providers conserved medical capacity and reallocated resources, which resulted in a reduction in elective and non-elective surgeries.

SOUTH KOREA’S MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL IMPLANT MARKET SHARE INSIGHTS

Overall, within the South Korean Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants market there are two dominant competitors: Joimax, Richard Wolf, and Medtronic.South Korean mis companiesJoimax held the leading share of the South Korean MIS implant market in 2021. This was due to the company’s leading position in the endoscope segment.

MARKET SEGMENTATION SUMMARY

While this report suite contains all applicable market data, each of the markets are also available as stand alone MedCore reports. This allows you to get access to only the specific market segment research that you need. You can view all these included reports and segmentation here:

  • Procedure Volumes for Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery – MedPro – Using a number of databases, internal and external, we’re able to provide you with the total volume of minimally invasive spinal implants procedures being performed for each of the markets mentioned in this suite of reports.
  • MIS Interbody Device Market – MedCore – Covers segmentation into the MIPLIF Market, MITLIF Market, LLIF Market, and OLIF Market.
  • MIS Pedicle Screw Market – MedCore – Segmented into 2 main markets: Percutaneous Cannulated Pedicle Screws and Retractor MIS Pedicle Screws.
  • Spinous Process Fixation Market – MedCore – This market covers several spinal fixation systems including both plating and rod and screws systems.
  • Facet Fixation Market – MedCore – Facet fixation is a type of percutaneous minimally invasive surgery in which the facet joints in the thoracolumbar region are fused using facet screws, bolts or allograft dowels.
  • MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Market – MedCore – SIJD can also be known as SI joint syndrome, SI joint strain and SI joint inflammation. Surgical treatment involves fusing the SI joint via an open surgery approach.
  • Spinal Endoscopy Market – MedCore – Spine endoscopes are visualization instrumen
    ts that allow for a minimally invasive approach to various procedures and resemble other arthroscopic and laparoscopic devices.
  • MIS Surgery Instrumentation Market – MedCore – Spinal instrumentation is used to stabilize the spine and carry out the procedure during minimally invasive spinal (MIS) procedures.

Research Scope Summary

Report Attribute Details
Regions South Korea
Base Year 2021
Forecast 2022-2028
Historical Data 2018-2021
Quantitative Coverage Market Size, Procedure Volume, Market Shares, Market Forecasts, Market Growth Rates, Units Sold, and Average Selling Prices.
Qualitative Coverage COVID-19 Impact, Market Growth Trends, Market Limiters, Competitive Analysis & SWOT for Top Competitors, Mergers & Acquisitions, Company Profiles, Product Portfolios
Data Sources Primary Interviews with Industry Leaders, Government Physician Data, Regulatory Data, Hospital Private Data, Import & Export Data, iData Research Internal Database.

FREE Sample Report

 

For a Full Table of Contents List, please Contact iData

TABLE OF CONTENTS I

LIST OF FIGURES IX
LIST OF CHARTS XIV
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
SOUTH KOREA MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL IMPLANT MARKET OVERVIEW 1
COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS 4
MARKET TRENDS 6
MARKET DEVELOPMENTS 8
PROCEDURE NUMBERS 10
MARKETS INCLUDED 11
KEY REPORT UPDATES 12
VERSION HISTORY 12
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 13
Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection 13
Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research 16
Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design 18
Step 4: Performing Primary Research 19
Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates 21
Step 6: Market Forecast and Analysis 22
Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities 24
Step 8: Final Review and Market Release 25
Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring 26
IMPACT OF COVID-19 ON THE SOUTH KOREA MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL IMPLANT MARKET 27
2.1 INTRODUCTION 27
2.2 ANALYSIS BY MARKET SEGMENT 29
2.2.1 Worst Case Scenario 29
2.2.2 Base Case Scenario 30
2.2.3 Best Case Scenario 31
DISEASE OVERVIEW 33
INTRODUCTION 33
3.1.1 Degenerative Disc Disease 33
3.1.1.1 Disc Herniation 33
3.1.1.2 Stenosis 34
3.1.1.3 Spondyloisthesis 34
3.1.1.4 Arthritis 35
3.1.2 Spinal Deformities 35
3.1.2.1 Scoliosis 35
3.1.2.2 Kyphosis and Lordosis 36
3.1.3 Trauma and Tumor 37
3.1.4 Vertebral Compression Fractures 37
3.1.4.1 Osteoporosis 37
3.1.4.2 Vertebral Compression Fractures 38
PRODUCT ASSESSMENT 39
INTRODUCTION 39
PRODUCT PORTFOLIOS 39
4.1.1 Cervical Fixation 39
4.1.1.1 Anterior Cervical Fixation 40
4.1.1.1.1 Constrained 40
4.1.1.1.2 Semi-Constrained 40
4.1.1.1.3 Dynamic 40
4.1.1.1.4 Bioresorbable 41
4.1.1.2 Posterior Cervical Fixation 41
4.1.2 Facet Fixation 44
4.1.3 Interbody Devices 46
4.1.3.1 Approaches 46
4.1.3.1.1 ALIF 46
4.1.3.1.2 PLIF 47
4.1.3.1.3 TLIF 47
4.1.3.1.4 Minimally Invasive PLIF 47
4.1.3.1.5 Minimally Invasive TLIF 48
4.1.3.1.6 LLIF 48
4.1.3.1.7 OLIF 48
4.1.3.1.8 Cervical 48
4.1.3.1.9 VBR/Corpectomy 49
4.1.3.2 Materials 49
4.1.3.2.1 Metal 49
4.1.3.2.2 PEEK 49
4.1.3.2.3 Machined Bone Allograft 49
4.1.4 MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion 53
4.1.5 Motion Preservation Devices 55
4.1.5.1 Artificial Discs 55
4.1.5.2 Dynamic Stabilization 55
4.1.5.2.1 Posterior Dynamic Stabilization 55
4.1.5.2.2 Interspinous Process Decompression 55
4.1.5.2.3 Nucleus Replacement 56
4.1.5.2.4 Facet Arthroplasty 56
4.1.6 Spinous Process Fixation 59
4.1.7 Spinal Electrical Stimulation Devices 61
4.1.8 Spine Endoscopes 63
4.1.9 Thoracolumbar Fixation 65
4.1.9.1 Traditional Systems 65
4.1.9.2 Minimally Invasive Systems 65
4.1.10 Vertebral Compression Fracture Devices 69
4.1.10.1 Percutaneous Vertebroplasty 69
4.1.10.2 Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation Including Kyphoplasty 70
REGULATORY ISSUES AND RECALLS 72
4.1.11 Medtronic 72
4.1.12 VGI Medical 73
4.1.13 Zimmer Biomet 74
CLINICAL TRIALS 77
4.1.14 Cervical Fixation 77
4.1.14.1 Other Companies 77
4.1.15 Interbody Devices 78
4.1.15.1 Other Companies 78
4.1.16 Facet Fixation 80
4.1.16.1 Medtronic 80
4.1.16.2 Other Companies 81
4.1.17 Percutaneous Vertebroplasty 81
4.1.17.1 Other Companies 81
SOUTH KOREA MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL IMPLANT MARKET OVERVIEW 83
5.1 INTRODUCTION 83
5.1.1 Minimally Invasive Interbody Fusion 84
5.1.1.1 Minimally Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion 84
5.1.1.2 Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion 85
5.1.1.3 Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion 85
5.1.1.4 Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion 86
5.1.2 Minimally Invasive Surgery Pedicle Screws 86
5.1.2.1 Percutaneous MIS Systems 86
5.1.2.2 Retractor-Based MIS Systems 87
5.1.3 Spinous Process Fixation 87
5.1.4 Facet Fixation 87
5.1.5 MIS Spine Endoscopes 88
5.2 CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATE 89
5.3 MARKET OVERVIEW & TREND ANALYSIS 90
5.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 94
5.4.1 Market Drivers 94
5.4.2 Market Limiters 94
5.5 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 96
5.6 MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS 103
5.7 COMPANY PROFILES 106
5.7.1 DePuy Synthes 106
5.7.2 Globus Medical 107
5.7.3 Joimax 109
5.7.4 Medtronic 110
5.7.5 NuVasive 111
5.7.6 SI-BONE 112
5.7.7 Stryker 113
5.7.8 VGI Medical 114
5.7.9 Zimmer Biomet 115
5.8 SWOT ANALYSIS 117
5.8.1 DePuy Synthes 118
5.8.2 Globus Medical 119
5.8.3 Joimax 120
5.8.4 Medtronic 121
5.8.5 NuVasive 122
5.8.6 SI-BONE 124
5.8.7 Stryker 125
5.8.8 VGI Medical 127
5.8.9 Zimmer Biomet 128
PROCEDURE NUMBERS 129
6.1 INTRODUCTION 129
6.2 PROCEDURES 130
6.2.1 MIS Interbody Device Procedures 133
6.2.1.1 MIPLIF Procedures 137
6.2.1.2 MITLIF Procedures 138
6.2.1.3 LLIF Procedures 139
6.2.1.4 OLIF Procedures 140
6.2.2 MIS Pedicle Screw Procedures 141
6.2.2.1 Percutaneous Cannulated Pedicle Screw Procedures 143
6.2.2.2 Retractor Cannulated Pedicle Screw Procedures 144
6.2.2.3 Retractor Non-Cannulated Pedicle Screw Procedures 145
6.2.3 Spinous Process Fixation Procedures 146
6.2.4 Facet Fixation Procedures 147
6.2.5 Spine Endoscope Procedures 148
MIS INTERBODY DEVICE MARKET 149
7.1 INTRODUCTION 149
7.1.1 Approach Types 150
7.1.1.1 Minimally Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion 150
7.1.1.2 Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion 150
7.1.1.3 Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion 151
7.1.1.4 Direct Lateral Interbody Fusion 151
7.1.1.5 eXtreme Lateral Interbody Fusion 151
7.1.1.6 Guided Lateral Interbody Fusion 152
7.1.1.7 Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion 152
7.2 MARKET OVERVIEW 153
7.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 156
7.3.1 MIS Interbody Device Market 156
7.3.2 MIPLIF Market 158
7.3.3 MITLIF Market 160
7.3.4 LLIF Market 162
7.3.5 OLIF Market 164
7.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 166
7.4.1 Market Drivers 166
7.4.2 Market Limiters 167
7.5 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 168
MIS PEDICLE SCREW MARKET 172
8.1 INTRODUCTION 172
8.1.1 Percutaneous MIS Systems 172
8.1.2 Retractor-Based MIS Systems 173
8.2 MARKET OVERVIEW 174
8.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 177
8.3.1 MIS Pedicle Screw Market 177
8.3.2 Percutaneous Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market 179
8.3.3 Retractor Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market 181
8.3.4 Retractor Non-Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market 183
8.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 185
8.4.1 Market Drivers 185
8.4.2 Market Limiters 186
8.5 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 188
SPINOUS PROCESS FIXATION MARKET 192
9.1 INTRODUCTION 192
9.2 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 193
9.3 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 196
9.3.1 Market Drivers 196
9.3.2 Market Limiters 197
9.4 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 198
FACET FIXATION MARKET 202
10.1 INTRODUCTION 202
10.2 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 203
10.3 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 206
10.3.1 Market Drivers 206
10.3.2 Market Limiters 207
10.4 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 208
SPINE ENDOSCOPE MARKET 211
11.1 INTRODUCTION 211
11.2 MARKET OVERVIEW 212
11.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 215
11.3.1 Spine Endoscope Market 215
11.3.2 Instrumentation Market 217
11.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 219
11.4.1 Market Drivers 219
11.4.2 Market Limiters 220
11.5 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 221
MIS SURGERY INSTRUMENTATION MARKET 224
12.1 INTRODUCTION 224
12.2 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 226
12.3 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 228
12.3.1 Market Drivers 228
12.3.2 Market Limiters 229
12.4 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 230
ABBREVIATIONS 232
For a Full Chart List, please Contact iData

LIST OF CHARTS

Chart 1 1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, South Korea, 2021 – 2028 3
Chart 1 2: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Overview, South Korea, 2021 & 2028 3
Chart 2 1: Multi-Scenario Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Forecast, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 32
Chart 5 1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 93
Chart 5 2: Leading Competitors, Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, South Korea, 2021 102
Chart 6 1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Procedures by Segment, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 132
Chart 7 1: MIS Interbody Device Market by Segment, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 155
Chart 7 2: Leading Competitors, MIS Interbody Device Market, South Korea, 2021 171
Chart 8 1: MIS Pedicle Screw Market by Segment, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 176
Chart 8 2: Leading Competitors, MIS Pedicle Screw Market, South Korea, 2021 191
Chart 9 1: Spinous Process Fixation Market, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 195
Chart 9 2: Leading Competitors, Spinous Process Fixation Market, South Korea, 2021 201
Chart 10 1: Facet Fixation Market, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 205
Chart 10 2: Leading Competitors, Facet Fixation Market, South Korea, 2021 210
Chart 11 1: Spine Endoscope Market by Segment, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 214
Chart 11 2: Leading Competitors, Spine Endoscope Market, South Korea, 2021 223
Chart 12 1: MIS Surgery Instrumentation Market, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 227
For a Full Figure List, please Contact iData

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure 1 1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Share Ranking by Segment, South Korea, 2021 4
Figure 1 2: Companies Researched in this Report 5
Figure 1 3: Factors Impacting the Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, South Korea (1 of 2) 6
Figure 1 4: Factors Impacting the Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, South Korea (2 of 2) 7
Figure 1 5: Recent Events in the Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, South Korea,  2018 – 2021 (1 of 2) 8
Figure 1 6: Recent Events in the Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, South Korea,  2018 – 2021 (2 of 2) 9
Figure 1 7: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Procedures Covered 10
Figure 1 8: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Markets Covered 11
Figure 1 9: Key Report Updates 12
Figure 1 10: Version History 12
Figure 2 1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, Worst Case Scenario, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 29
Figure 2 2: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, Base Case Scenario, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 30
Figure 2 3: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, Best Case Scenario, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 31
Figure 4 1: Cervical Fixation Devices by Company (1 of 2) 42
Figure 4 2: Cervical Fixation Devices by Company (2 of 2) 43
Figure 4 3: Facet Fixation Devices by Company 45
Figure 4 4: Interbody Devices by Company (1 of 3) 50
Figure 4 5: Interbody Devices by Company (2 of 3) 51
Figure 4 6: Interbody Devices by Company (3 of 3) 52
Figure 4 7: MIS Sacroiliac Joint Devices by Company 54
Figure 4 8: Cervical Artificial Disc Devices by Company 57
Figure 4 9: Lumbar Artificial Disc Devices by Company 57
Figure 4 10: Dynamic Posterior Stabilization Devices by Company 58
Figure 4 11: Interspinous Process Decompression Devices by Company 58
Figure 4 12: Spinous Process Fixation Devices by Company 60
Figure 4 13: Spinal Electrical Stimulation Devices by Company 62
Figure 4 14: Spine Endoscopes by Company 64
Figure 4 15: Thoracolumbar Fixation Devices by Company (1 of 3) 66
Figure 4 16: Thoracolumbar Fixation Devices by Company (2 of 3) 67
Figure 4 17: Thoracolumbar Fixation Devices by Company (3 of 3) 68
Figure 4 18: Vertebral Compression Fracture Devices by Company 71
Figure 4 19: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic Prestige LP(TM) Cervical Disc System with Streamlined Instruments, DRILL GUIDES 72
Figure 4 20: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic ZEVO(TM) Anterior Cervical Plate System SLOT SCREW 72
Figure 4 21: Class 2 Device Recall Vectris Trial Screening Lead Kit for Spinal Cord Stimulation 72
Figure 4 22: Class 2 Device Recall Vectris Trial Screening Lead Kit for Spinal Cord Stimulation 73
Figure 4 23: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic CD HORIZON Spinal System MULTIAXIAL SCREW FOR 5.5/6.0MM RODS 73
Figure 4 24: Class 2 Device Recall VerteLP Instrument Kit 73
Figure 4 25: Class 2 Device Recall The MobiC Cervical Disc Prosthesis (MobiC; MobiC 14mm Distraction Screw 74
Figure 4 26: Class 2 Device Recall Lineum OCT Spine System 74
Figure 4 27: Class 2 Device Recall ROSA 1.0.2 (Spine application) 74
Figure 4 28: Class 2 Device Recall Polaris 5.5 Spinal System and Polaris 5.5/Cypher Spinal System 75
Figure 4 29: Class 2 Device Recall Vital MIS Spinal Fixation system 75
Figure 4 30: Class 2 Device Recall Lineum OCT Spine System 75
Figure 4 31: Class 2 Device Recall Zimmer Biomet Vitality Spinal Fixation System 76
Figure 4 32: Class 1 Device Recall SpF PLUSMini (60 A/W) Implantable Spinal Fusion Stimulator 76
Figure 4 33: Comparison of Short Segment Mono-axial and Poly-axial Pedicle Screw Fixation for Thoracolumbar Fractures 77
Figure 4 34: Prospective Study of Fusion Rates Using Spira-C Device for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery (ACDF) 78
Figure 4 35: Bio2 Vitrium® Cervical Cage in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion 78
Figure 4 36: SPIRA™-A 3D and HCT/p DBM vs. Medtronic Divergent™-L/Perimeter™ and Recombinant BMP-2 79
Figure 4 37: Retro-prospective Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of the Stand-alone Cervical Interbody Cage C-CURVE (Peek and Titanium) Manufactured by MEDICREA® (C-CURVE) 79
Figure 4 38: Percutaneous Screw Fixation vs. Open Fixation in the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures (PrecScrew) 80
Figure 4 39: Clinical Outcome of Implant Removal Versus Retention After Posterior Fixation of Thoracolumbar Fractures 81
Figure 4 40: Early Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Versus Standard Conservative Treatment in Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fractures (AGIL11) 81
Figure 4 41: Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Using Rotary Cutter for Bone Metastases 82
Figure 5 1: Currency Exchange Rate, 2021 89
Figure 5 2: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 91
Figure 5 3: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 (KR₩M) 92
Figure 5 4: Leading Competitors, Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, South Korea, 2021 101
Figure 5 5: SWOT Analysis, DePuy Synthes 118
Figure 5 6: SWOT Analysis, Globus Medical 119
Figure 5 7: SWOT Analysis, Joimax 120
Figure 5 8: SWOT Analysis, Medtronic 121
Figure 5 9: SWOT Analysis, NuVasive (1 of 2) 122
Figure 5 10: SWOT Analysis, NuVasive (2 of 2) 123
Figure 5 11: SWOT Analysis, SI-BONE 124
Figure 5 12: SWOT Analysis, Stryker (1 of 2) 125
Figure 5 13: SWOT Analysis, Stryker (2 of 2) 126
Figure 5 14: SWOT Analysis, VGI Medical 127
Figure 5 15: SWOT Analysis, Zimmer Biomet 128
Figure 6 1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Procedures by Segment, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 131
Figure 6 2: MIS Interbody Device Procedures by Segment, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 134
Figure 6 3: Total Levels Treated, MIS Interbody Device, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 135
Figure 6 4: Total MIS Interbody Device Procedures, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 136
Figure 6 5: MIPLIF Procedures, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 137
Figure 6 6: MITLIF Procedures, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 138
Figure 6 7: LLIF Procedures, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 139
Figure 6 8: OLIF Procedures, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 140
Figure 6 9: MIS Pedicle Screw Procedures by Segment, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 141
Figure 6 10: Total Levels Treated, MIS Pedicle Screw, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 142
Figure 6 11: Total MIS Pedicle Screw Procedures, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 142
Figure 6 12: Percutaneous Cannulated Pedicle Screw Procedures, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 143
Figure 6 13: Retractor Cannulated Pedicle Screw Procedures, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 144
Figure 6 14: Retractor Non-Cannulated Pedicle Screw Procedures, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 145
Figure 6 15: Spinous Process Fixation Procedures, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 146
Figure 6 16: Facet Fixation Procedures, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 147
Figure 6 17: Spine Endoscope Procedures, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 148
Figure 7 1: MIS Interbody Device Market by Segment, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 154
Figure 7 2: MIS Interbody Device Market by Segment, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 (KR₩M) 154
Figure 7 3: MIS Interbody Device Market, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 157
Figure 7 4: MIPLIF Market, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 159
Figure 7 5: MITLIF Market, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 161
Figure 7 6: LLIF Market, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 163
Figure 7 7: OLIF Market, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 165
Figure 7 8: Leading Competitors, MIS Interbody Device Market, South Korea, 2021 170
Figure 8 1: MIS Pedicle Screw Market by Segment, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 174
Figure 8 2: MIS Pedicle Screw Market by Segment, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 (KR₩M) 175
Figure 8 3: MIS Pedicle Screw Market, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 178
Figure 8 4: Percutaneous Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 180
Figure 8 5: Retractor Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 182
Figure 8 6: Retractor Non-Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 184
Figure 8 7: Leading Competitors, MIS Pedicle Screw Market, South Korea, 2021 190
Figure 9 1: Spinous Process Fixation Market, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 194
Figure 9 2: Leading Competitors, Spinous Process Fixation Market, South Korea, 2021 200
Figure 10 1: Facet Fixation Market, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 204
Figure 10 2: Leading Competitors, Facet Fixation Market, South Korea, 2021 209
Figure 11 1: Spine Endoscope Market by Segment, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 213
Figure 11 2: Spine Endoscope Market by Segment, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 (KR₩M) 213
Figure 11 3: Spine Endoscope Market, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 216
Figure 11 4: Instrumentation Market, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 218
Figure 11 5: Leading Competitors, Spine Endoscope Market, South Korea, 2021 222
Figure 12 1: MIS Surgery Instrumentation Market, South Korea, 2018 – 2028 226
Figure 12 2: Leading Competitors, MIS Surgery Instrumentation Market, South Korea, 2021 231

iData’s 9-Step Research Methodology

Our reports follow an in-depth 9-step methodology which focuses on the following research systems:

  • Original primary research that consists of the most up-to-date market data
  • Strong foundation of quantitative and qualitative research
  • Focused on the needs and strategic challenges of the industry participants

Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection During this preliminary investigation, all staff members involved in the industry discusses the topic in detail.

Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research The first task of the research team is to prepare for the data collection process: Filing systems and relational databases are developed as needed.

Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design The core of all iData research reports is primary market research. Interviews with industry insiders represent the single most reliable way to obtain accurate, current data about market conditions, trends, threats and opportunities.

Step 4: Performing Primary Research At this stage, interviews are performed using contacts and information acquired in the secondary research phase.

Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates Following the completion of the primary research phase, the collected information must be synthesized into an accurate view of the market status. The most important question is the current state of the market.

Step 6: Market Forecast and Analysis iData Research uses a proprietary method to combine statistical data and opinions of industry experts to forecast future market values.

Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities iData analysts identify in broad terms why some companies are gaining or losing share within a given market segment.

Step 8: Final Review and Market Release An integral part of the iData research methodology is a built-in philosophy of quality control and continuing improvement is integral to the iData philosophy.

Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring iData philosophy of continuous improvement requires that reports and consulting projects be monitored after release for customer feedback and market accuracy.

Click Here to Read More About Our Methodology