
Dental Materials Market Size, Share & COVID-19 Impact Analysis | United States | 2023-2029 | MedSuite | Includes: Dental Cements, Dental Impression Materials, and 5 more
- Year: 2023
- Scope: 10 Years
- Region: United States
- Pages: 317
- Published Date: 01/18/2023
- Type: MedSuite
Overall, the U.S. dental materials market was valued at approximately $1.6 billion in 2022. This is expected to increase over the forecast period at a CAGR of 3.5% to reach approximately $2.1 billion.
Throughout this medical market research, we analyzed 25 dental materials companies across the United States and used our comprehensive methodology to understand the market sizes, unit sales, company market shares, and procedure numbers to create accurate forecasts.
The full report suite on the U.S. market for dental materials includes dental cements, dental impression materials, direct restorative materials, temporary restorative materials, dental bonding agents, dental core build-up materials and dental anesthetics.
DATA TYPES INCLUDED
- Unit Sales, Average Selling Prices, Market Value & Growth Trends
- Dental Material Procedure Volumes
- Market Forecasts Until 2029, and Historical Data to 2019
- Market Drivers & Limiters for Each Dental Materials market segment
- Competitive Analysis with Market Shares for Each Segment
- Recent Mergers & Acquisitions
- COVID19 Impact on the US Dental Materials market
- Disease Overviews and Demographic Information
- Company Profiles, Product Portfolios and SWOT for Top Competitors
U.S. Dental Materials PROCEDURE NUMBERS
The number of dental material procedures performed in the U.S. will experience modest growth over the forecast period, expanding at a low-single-digit rate. The bulk of procedural growth was in dental anesthetic procedures, which rose with the aging population.
U.S. Dental Materials Market Insights
In 2022, the total dental materials market was valued at approximately $1.6 billion, a modest increase over the previous year. Dental materials are consumable goods that are bought recurrently by dentists. As such, demand behaves less elastically in this market and suffers less from economic shocks compared with other dental products, such as CAD/CAM devices and dental chairs. Moreover, sales perform proportionately with the number of dental procedures conducted per year, a number that has shown a steady increase and is expected to continue to grow through 2029.
U.S. Dental Materials Market Share Insights
Overall, within the U.S. dental materials device market there are three dominant competitors: 3M, Dentsply Sirona, and Kerr Corporation.
3M, Dentsply Sirona and Kerr Corporation, commonly referred to as the “Big 3” in the dental industry, collectively represented over half of the total U.S. dental materials market share. 3M was the leader in five of the dental material segments. 3M’s in-depth market analysis and consultation with dental professionals play a key role in the company’s product development strategy and result in highly differentiated products.
Detailed Market Segmentation
- Dental Cements Market – MedCore – The market is comprised of the following:
- Product Type: Permanent Cement and Temporary Cement;
- Material Type: Composite Resin, Glass Ionomer / RMGI, Zinc Polycarboxylate, and Zinc Phosphate;
- Delivery Type: Powder/Liquid, Two-Paste/Syringe, Capsule Systems, and Auto-mix Syringe;
- Curing Method: Light-Cure, Self-Cure, and Dual-Cure;
- Application Type: Crowns and Bridges, Posts, Inlays, Onlays and Veneers, Dental Implant Crowns.
- Dental Impression Material Market – MedCore – The market is comprised of the following:
- Product Type: Vinyl Polysiloxane, Polyether, and Alginate;
- Delivery Type: Cartridge / Syringe / Garant Gun, Hand-Mix, Dynamic Mixer.
- Direct Restorative Material Market – MedCore – The analysis dives deep into segmentation by:
- Product Type: Composites, Glass Ionomer/Resin Ionomer, and Amalgam;
- Delivery Type: Powder/Liquid, Two-Paste/Syringe, Unit Dose/Capsules, Auto-Mix Syringe;
- Curing Method: Light-Cure, Self-Cure, and Dual-Cure;
- Viscosity: Low Viscosity, Regular Viscosity, and High Viscosity.
- Temporary Restorative Material Market – MedCore – The market consists of the segments, such as Composites, Acrylic, and Other.
- Dental Bonding Agents Market – MedCore – The analysis is comprised of the segmentation based on:
- Product Type: Total-Etch, Self-Etch, and Universal;
- Delivery Type: Two-Paste/Syringe, Brush (Unit Dose)/Capsule/Vial/Bottle, Auto-Mix;
- Curing Method: Light-Cure, Self-Cure, Dual-Cure;
- Application: Direct and Indirect.
- Dental Core Build-Up Material Market – MedCore – The chapter is further broken down by:
- Product Type: Composite Resin, Glass Ionomer/RMGI, and others;
- Delivery Type: Auto-Mix Syringe, Hand-Mix Powder and Liquid, Pre-Mix;
- Curing Method: Light-Cure, Self-Cure, and Dual-Cure.
- Dental Anesthetics Market – MedCore – The market is further broken down into segments by:
- Product Type: Topical and Local Injection;
- Drug Type: Lidocaine, Articaine, Mepivacaine, Bupivacaine, and Prilocaine.
RESEARCH SCOPE SUMMARY
Report Attribute | Details |
---|---|
Regions | North America (United States) |
Base Year | 2022 |
Forecast | 2023-2029 |
Historical Data | 2019-2022 |
Quantitative Coverage | Market Size, Market Shares, Market Forecasts, Market Growth Rates, Units Sold, and Average Selling Prices. |
Qualitative Coverage | COVID-19 Impact, Market Growth Trends, Market Limiters, Competitive Analysis & SWOT for Top Competitors, Mergers & Acquisitions, Company Profiles, Product Portfolios, FDA Recalls, Disruptive Technologies, Disease Overviews. |
Data Sources | Primary Interviews with Industry Leaders, Government Physician Data, Regulatory Data, Hospital Private Data, Import & Export Data, iData Research Internal Database. |
WHY CHOOSE IDATA?
- Experts Only – iData has been around for over 17 years and is the trusted source of intelligence, and data-driven insights for key industry players. We are made up of specialists with a sole focus on medical devices, dental devices and pharmaceuticals. Our research and consulting field of endeavour never strays from the medical device industry and, because of this, we are the number one choice for leading companies in this field.
- Global Coverage – iData’s unique methodology, and its expansion to over 70 countries world-wide, has made it one of the most viable sources of intelligence for global companies along with those who plan to expand their portfolio beyond the confines of their own country. Providing procedural data at the country level is another testimony to the trusted global coverage we provide.
- Attention to Detail – It’s our attention to small details, scheduling of timelines, and keen project management that makes us stand out from the rest. We are creative, and our reports include metrics such as procedure numbers, ASPs, and SKU-level insights that are not found elsewhere.
- Pricing – When comparing like-with-like, iData’s prices are not only extremely competitive but also the most cost-effective. We strive for success and want the same for our clients. With the level of detail incorporated into each report alongside the extensive segmentation provided, no other report compares at our price point.
Table of Contents
TABLE of CONTENTS |
List of Figures |
List of Charts |
executive summary |
U.S. Dental Materials Market Overview |
Competitive Analysis |
Market Trends |
Market Developments |
Procedure Numbers |
Markets Included |
Key Report Updates |
Version History |
research methodology |
Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection |
Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research |
Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design |
Step 4: Performing Primary Research |
Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates |
Step 6: Market Forecast and Analysis |
Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities |
Step 8: Final Review and Market Release |
Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring |
impact of covid-19 on THE U.S. Dental Materials Market |
2.1 Introduction |
2.2 Analysis By Market Segment |
2.2.1 Worst Case Scenario |
2.2.2 Base Case Scenario |
2.2.3 Best Case Scenario |
Disease Overview |
3.1 Basic Anatomy |
3.1.1 Dental Anatomy: Oral Cavity and Intraoral Landmarks |
3.2 Disease Pathology and Disorders |
3.2.1 Routine Dental Examination |
3.2.2 Dental Emergencies |
3.2.3 Restorative Dentistry |
3.3 Patient Demographics |
Product Assessment |
4.1 Introduction |
4.2 Product Portfolios |
4.2.1 Dental Cements |
4.2.1.1 Temporary Cements |
4.2.1.2 Permanent Cements |
4.2.2 Dental Impression Materials |
4.2.2.1 Alginate |
4.2.2.2 Polyether |
4.2.2.3 Vinyl Polysiloxane |
4.2.3 Direct Restorative Materials |
4.2.3.1 Amalgam |
4.2.3.2 Composites |
4.2.3.3 GI and RMGI Materials |
4.2.4 Temporary Restorative Materials |
4.2.5 Dental Bonding Agents |
4.2.5.1 Total-Etch Systems |
4.2.5.2 Self-Etch Systems |
4.2.5.3 Universal-Etch Systems |
4.2.6 Dental Core Build-Up Materials |
4.2.7 Dental Anesthetics |
4.3 Regulatory Issues and Recalls |
4.3.1 Dental Cements |
4.3.1.1 Kerr |
4.3.1.2 Ivoclar Vivadent |
4.3.2 Dental Impression Materials |
4.3.2.1 Ivoclar Vivadent |
4.3.3 Direct Restorative Materials |
4.3.3.1 Ivoclar Vivadent |
4.3.3.2 Ultradent |
4.3.3.3 VOCO |
4.3.3.4 Ormco |
4.3.4 Dental Bonding Agents |
4.3.4.1 Ultradent |
4.3.4.2 VOCO |
4.4 Clinical Trials |
4.4.1 Dental Cements |
4.4.2 Dental Impression Materials |
4.4.3 Direct Restorative Materials |
4.4.4 Temporary Restorative Materials |
4.4.5 Dental Bonding Agents |
4.4.6 Dental Anesthetics |
U.S. Dental Materials Market Overview |
5.1 Introduction |
5.1.1 Impression Materials |
5.1.1.1 Alginate |
5.1.1.2 Polyether |
5.1.1.3 Vinyl Polysiloxane |
5.1.2 Direct Restorative Materials |
5.1.2.1 Amalgam |
5.1.2.2 Composites |
5.1.2.3 GI and RMGI Materials |
5.1.3 Temporary Restorative Materials |
5.1.4 Bonding Agents |
5.1.4.1 Total-Etch Systems |
5.1.4.2 Self-Etch Systems |
5.1.4.3 Universal-Etch Systems |
5.1.5 Core Build-Up Materials |
5.1.6 Dental Cements |
5.1.6.1 Temporary Cements |
5.1.6.2 Permanent Cements |
5.1.7 Dental Anesthetics |
5.2 Market Overview & Trend Analysis |
5.3 Drivers and Limiters |
5.3.1 Market Drivers |
5.3.2 Market Limiters |
5.4 Competitive Market Share Analysis |
5.5 Mergers and Acquisitions |
5.6 Company Profiles |
5.6.1 3M |
5.6.2 Bisco |
5.6.3 Dentsply Sirona |
5.6.4 DMG |
5.6.5 GC Corporation |
5.6.6 Ivoclar Vivadent |
5.6.7 Kerr |
5.6.8 Kulzer |
5.6.9 Kuraray |
5.6.10 Septodont |
5.6.11 VOCO |
5.7 SWOT Analysis |
5.7.1 3M |
5.7.2 Bisco |
5.7.3 Dentsply Sirona |
5.7.4 DMG |
5.7.5 GC Corporation |
5.7.6 Ivoclar Vivadent |
5.7.7 Kerr |
5.7.8 Kulzer |
5.7.9 Kuraray |
5.7.10 Septodont |
5.7.11 VOCO |
Procedure Numbers |
6.1 Procedure Overview |
6.1.1 Dental Cement Procedures |
6.1.2 Dental Impression Procedures |
6.1.3 Direct Restorative Procedures |
6.1.4 Temporary Restorative Procedures |
6.1.5 Bonding Procedures |
6.1.6 Core Build-Up Procedures |
6.1.7 Anesthetic Procedures |
Dental Cement Market |
7.1 Introduction |
7.2 Market Overview |
7.3 Market Analysis and Forecast |
7.3.1 Total Dental Cement Market |
7.3.2 Permanent Dental Cement Market |
7.3.3 Temporary Dental Cement Market |
7.4 Unit Analysis and Forecast |
7.4.1 Permanent Dental Cement Units Sold by Material Type |
7.4.2 Permanent Dental Cement Units Sold by Delivery Type |
7.4.3 Permanent Dental Cement Units Sold by Curing Method |
7.4.4 Permanent Dental Cement Units Sold by Application Type |
7.4.5 Units Sold by Distribution |
7.5 Drivers and Limiters |
7.5.1 Market Drivers |
7.5.2 Market Limiters |
7.6 Competitive Market Share Analysis |
Dental Impression material Market |
8.1 Introduction |
8.2 Market Overview |
8.3 Market Analysis and Forecast |
8.3.1 Vinyl Polysiloxane Dental Impression Material Market |
8.3.2 Polyether Dental Impression Material Market |
8.3.3 Alginate Dental Impression Material Market |
8.3.4 Other Dental Impression Material Market |
8.4 Unit Analysis and Forecast |
8.4.1 Dental Impression Units Sold by Material Type |
8.4.2 Dental Impression Units Sold by Delivery Type |
8.4.3 Units Sold by Distribution |
8.5 Drivers and Limiters |
8.5.1 Market Drivers |
8.5.2 Market Limiters |
8.6 Competitive Market Share Analysis |
DIRECT RESTORATIVE MATERIAL Market |
9.1 Introduction |
9.2 Market Overview |
9.3 Market Analysis and Forecast |
9.3.1 Total Direct Restorative Material Market |
9.3.2 Composite Direct Restorative Material Market |
9.3.3 Glass/Resin Ionomer Direct Restorative Material Market |
9.3.4 Amalgam Direct Restorative Material Market |
9.4 Unit Analysis and Forecast |
9.4.1 Direct Restorative Units Sold by Material Type |
9.4.2 Direct Restorative Units Sold by Delivery Type |
9.4.3 Direct Restorative Units Sold by Curing Method |
9.4.4 Direct Restorative Units Sold by Viscosity |
9.4.5 Units Sold by Direct Sales |
9.5 Drivers and Limiters |
9.5.1 Market Drivers |
9.5.2 Market Limiters |
9.6 Competitive Market Share Analysis |
TEMPORARY restorative MATERIAL Market |
10.1 Introduction |
10.2 Market Analysis and Forecast |
10.3 Unit Analysis and Forecast |
10.3.1 Temporary Restorative Units Sold by Material Type |
10.3.2 Temporary Restorative Units Sold by Curing Method |
10.3.3 Temporary Restorative Units Sold by Delivery Method |
10.3.4 Units Sold by Distribution |
10.4 Drivers and Limiters |
10.4.1 Market Drivers |
10.4.2 Market Limiters |
10.5 Competitive Market Share Analysis |
dENTAL BONDING AGENT Market |
11.1 Introduction |
11.2 Market Overview |
11.3 Market Analysis and Forecast |
11.3.1 Total Dental Bonding Agent Market |
11.3.2 Total-Etch Dental Bonding Agent Market |
11.3.3 Self-Etch Dental Bonding Agent Market |
11.3.4 Universal Dental Bonding Agent Market |
11.4 Unit Analysis and Forecast |
11.4.1 Dental Bonding Agent Units Sold by Delivery Type |
11.4.2 Dental Bonding Agent Units Sold by Curing Method |
11.4.3 Dental Bonding Agent Units Sold by Application Type |
11.4.4 Units Sold by Distribution |
11.5 Drivers and Limiters |
11.5.1 Market Drivers |
11.5.2 Market Limiters |
11.6 Competitive Market Share Analysis |
Dental Core build-up material Market |
12.1 Introduction |
12.2 Market Overview |
12.3 Market Analysis and Forecast |
12.3.1 Total Dental Core Build-Up Material Market |
12.3.2 Composite Resin Dental Core Build-Up Material Market |
12.3.3 GI and RMGI Dental Core Build-Up Material Market |
12.3.4 Other Dental Core Build-Up Material Market |
12.4 Unit Analysis and Forecast |
12.4.1 Dental Core Build-Up Units Sold by Material Type |
12.4.2 Dental Core Build-Up Units Sold by Delivery Type |
12.4.3 Dental Core Build-Up Units Sold by Curing Method |
12.4.4 Units Sold by Distribution |
12.5 Drivers and Limiters |
12.5.1 Market Drivers |
12.5.2 Market Limiters |
12.6 Competitive Market Share Analysis |
dENTAL ANESTHETIC Market |
13.1 Introduction |
13.2 Market Overview |
13.3 Market Analysis and Forecast |
13.3.1 Topical Dental Anesthetic Market |
13.3.2 Local Injection Anesthetic Market |
13.4 Unit Analysis and Forecast |
13.4.1 Dental Anesthetic Units Sold by Drug Type |
13.5 Drivers and Limiters |
13.5.1 Market Drivers |
13.5.2 Market Limiters |
13.6 Competitive Market Share Analysis |
Abbreviations |
Companies Included:
· Centrix Incorporated | · Pentron Clinical |
· Coltène | · Pierrel Pharma |
· Cosmedent | · Premier Dental |
· DenMat | · PROTEC Dental Laboratories |
· Directa Dental Group | · Pulpdent Corporation |
· DMG America | · SDI |
· Doxa Dental | · Shofu |
· Glidewell Laboratories | · SourceOne Dental |
· Henry Schein | · Sultan Healthcare |
· J Morita | · Tokuyama |
· Kettenbach | · Ultradent |
· Keystone Industries | · Zest Dental Solutions |
· Kulzer |
List of Charts
Chart 1‑1: Dental Materials Market by Segment, U.S., 2022 – 2029 |
Chart 1‑2: Dental Materials Market Overview, U.S., 2022 & 2029 |
Chart 2‑1: Multi-Scenario Dental Materials Market Forecast, U.S., 2019 – 2029 (US$M) |
Chart 5‑1: Dental Materials Market by Segment, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Chart 5‑2: Leading Competitors, Dental Materials Market, U.S., 2022 |
Chart 6‑1: Dental Materials Procedure Numbers by Segment, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Chart 7‑1: Dental Cement Market by Segment, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Chart 7‑2: Leading Competitors, Dental Cement Market, U.S., 2022 |
Chart 8‑1: Dental Impression Material Market by Segment, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Chart 8‑2: Leading Competitors, Dental Impression Material Market, U.S., 2022 |
Chart 9‑1: Direct Restorative Material Market by Segment, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Chart 9‑2: Leading Competitors, Direct Restorative Material Market, U.S., 2022 |
Chart 10‑1: Temporary Restorative Material Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Chart 10‑2: Leading Competitors, Temporary Restorative Material Market, U.S., 2022 |
Chart 11‑1: Dental Bonding Agent Market by Segment, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Chart 11‑2: Leading Competitors, Dental Bonding Agent Market, U.S., 2022 |
Chart 12‑1: Dental Core Build-Up Material Market by Segment, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Chart 12‑2: Leading Competitors, Dental Core Build-Up Material Market, U.S., 2022 |
Chart 13‑1: Dental Anesthetic Market by Segment, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Chart 13‑2: Leading Competitors, Dental Anesthetic Market, U.S., 2022 |
List of Figures
Figure 1‑1: Dental Materials Market Share Ranking by Segment, U.S., 2022 (1 of 2) |
Figure 1‑2: Dental Materials Market Share Ranking by Segment, U.S., 2022 (2 of 2) |
Figure 1‑3: Companies Researched in This Report |
Figure 1‑4: Factors Impacting the Dental Materials Market by Segment, U.S. (1 of 2) |
Figure 1‑5: Factors Impacting the Dental Materials Market by Segment, U.S. (2 of 2) |
Figure 1‑6: Recent Events in the Dental Materials Market, U.S., 2019 – 2022 |
Figure 1‑7: Dental Materials Procedures Covered |
Figure 1‑8: Dental Materials Markets Covered (1 of 3) |
Figure 1‑9: Dental Materials Markets Covered (2 of 3) |
Figure 1‑10: Dental Materials Markets Covered (3 of 3) |
Figure 1‑11: Key Report Updates |
Figure 1‑12: Version History |
Figure 2‑1: Dental Materials Market by Segment, Worst Case Scenario, U.S., 2019 – 2029 (US$M) |
Figure 2‑2: Dental Materials Market by Segment, Base Case Scenario, U.S., 2019 – 2029 (US$M) |
Figure 2‑3: Dental Materials Market by Segment, Best Case Scenario, U.S., 2019 – 2029 (US$M) |
Figure 4‑1: Dental Cement Products by Company (1 of 2) |
Figure 4‑2: Dental Cement Products by Company (2 of 2) |
Figure 4‑3: Dental Impression Materials by Company |
Figure 4‑4: Direct Restorative Materials by Company (1 of 3) |
Figure 4‑5: Direct Restorative Materials by Company (2 of 3) |
Figure 4‑6: Direct Restorative Materials by Company (3 of 3) |
Figure 4‑7: Temporary Restorative Materials by Company |
Figure 4‑8: Dental Bonding Agents by Company |
Figure 4‑9: Dental Core Build-Up Materials by Company |
Figure 4‑10: Dental Local Anesthetics Products by Company |
Figure 4‑11: Class 2 Device Recall Nexus Universal with OptiBond Universal Trial Kit |
Figure 4‑12: Class 2 Device Recall Virtual XD |
Figure 4‑13: Class 2 Device Recall Virtual XD |
Figure 4‑14: Class 3 Device Recall Heliomolar |
Figure 4‑15: Class 2 Device Recall PermaFlo A2 Refill Flowable Composite |
Figure 4‑16: Class 2 Device Recall Grandio SO |
Figure 4‑17: Class 2 Device Recall Sealapex Xpress |
Figure 4‑18: Class 2 Device Recall Peak SE Primer |
Figure 4‑19: Class 2 Device Recall VOCO Futurabond M adhesive |
Figure 4‑20: Clinical Performance of Different Resin Cements |
Figure 4‑21: Clinical Outcomes of CAD/CAM Single-Retainer Monolithic Zirconia Ceramic Resin-Bonded Fixed Dentures Bonded With Two Different Resin Cements |
Figure 4‑22: Clinical Performance of Different Resin Cements |
Figure 4‑23: Follow-up of Indirect Restorations Luted With Different Adhesive Resin Cement |
Figure 4‑24: Clinical Outcomes of Bonded Monolithic Translucent Zirconia Crowns Using Two Different Compositions of Self-adhesive Resin Cements |
Figure 4‑25: Dental Cement in Post-operative Sensitivity: Randomized Clinical Trial (Bioactivity) |
Figure 4‑26: Influences of Different Temporary Cement on Retention Rate of Temporary Crowns |
Figure 4‑27: Cost-efficacy of Atraumatic Restorations (ART) Using Different Encapsulated Glass Ionomer Cement |
Figure 4‑28: Influence of Luting Cement on the Clinical Outcomes of Zirconia Pediatric Crowns |
Figure 4‑29: Orthodontic Patient Experience of Intraoral Scans Versus Alginate Impressions (OPESI) |
Figure 4‑30: Digital Versus Conventional Impression Techniques in Children |
Figure 4‑31: Clinical Study 3MESPE Crowns |
Figure 4‑32: Intraoral Impressions for Assessment of Wear of Teeth and Restorative Materials. (GIC) |
Figure 4‑33: Digital vs Conventional Impressions Study |
Figure 4‑34: Clinical Performance of Restorative Materials in Primary Teeth |
Figure 4‑35: Longevity of Dental Fillings Utilizing 3D Printing |
Figure 4‑36: Clinical Evaluation of a Restorative Glass Ionomer and a Composite Resin for the Restoration |
Figure 4‑37: Clinical Performance of a Glass-ionomer Restorative System in Extended-sized Cavities |
Figure 4‑38: Clinical Performance of Incremental and Bulk Fill Composites in Class II Restorations |
Figure 4‑39: Clinical Performance of Posterior Glass Ionomer Restorations in Adolescents (KETAC) |
Figure 4‑40: Clinical Evaluation of Basic Filling Material in Class I and II Posterior Restorations |
Figure 4‑41: Class II Restoration Using Bioactive Restorative Material vs Polyacid Modified Composite Resin in Primary Molars |
Figure 4‑42: Clinical Evaluation of SI-R21204 Versus Nano-hybrid Resin Composite: A Prospective Controlled Clinical Trial |
Figure 4‑43: Clinical Evaluation of Kerr SonicFill™ 2 vs 3M ESPE Filtek™ Supreme Ultra Universal Restorative |
Figure 4‑44: Influence of Temporary Filling Material Composition on the Success Rate of Endodontic Treatments |
Figure 4‑45: Influence of the Composition of Temporary Restorative Material in Vital Teeth |
Figure 4‑46: Scotchbond Universal Plus Compared to Scotchbond Universal With Filtek Universal Restorative to Restore Class V NCCLs (SBU+ClassV) |
Figure 4‑47: Effectiveness of Fissure Sealants Bonded With Different Universal Adhesives |
Figure 4‑48: Scotchbond Universal Plus Compared to Scotchbond Universal for Posterior Class I & II Restorations With Filtek Universal |
Figure 4‑49: Clinical Evaluation of Self-Adhesive Bulk-fill Resin Composite Versus Conventionally Bonded Bulk-fill Resin Composite in Restoration of Proximal Lesions |
Figure 4‑50: Retention of a Flowable Resin-based Sealant With Two Types of Adhesives |
Figure 4‑51: Clinical Comparison of Different Adhesives in NCCLs |
Figure 4‑52: Clinical Evaluation of Three Different Universal Adhesives in Non-carious Cervical Lesions |
Figure 4‑53: Clinical Comparison of Universal Adhesives in Terms of Different Application Modes on the Restoration of NCCLs |
Figure 4‑54: Self-Reported Pain in Children Submitted to Single Infiltration of Articaine During Primary Molar Extraction |
Figure 4‑55: Efficacy of 4% Articaine Terminal Anesthesia in the Lateral Jaw Region in Children |
Figure 4‑56: Local Anesthesia With Lidocaine or Articaine for Molars Affected by MIH |
Figure 4‑57: Articaine 4% Efficacy and Safety in Extraction and Pulpotomy of Primary Molars of Children Below the Age of Four Years |
Figure 4‑58: Articaine 4% Versus Lidocaine 2% for Local Anesthesia of MIH-affected Maxillary Molars |
Figure 4‑59: Buffered Lidocaine in the Pediatric Dental Patient |
Figure 4‑60: Using Anesthetic Gel Patches to Reduce Pain of Palatal Injection |
Figure 4‑61: Articaine and Bupivacaine in Impacted Tooth Surgery |
Figure 4‑62: Evaluation of Articaine 4% Versus Mepivacaine 2% for Surgery of Molars Thirds: Clinical Trial |
Figure 4‑63: Comparison of Articaine and Prilocaine for Extraction of Maxillary Teeth |
Figure 5‑1: Dental Materials Market by Segment, U.S., 2019 – 2029 (US$M) |
Figure 5‑2: Leading Competitors, Dental Materials Market, U.S., 2022 |
Figure 6‑1: Dental Materials Procedure Numbers by Segment, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 6‑2: Dental Cement Procedure Numbers by Segment, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 6‑3: Dental Impression Procedure Numbers by Material Type, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 6‑4: Direct Restorative Procedure Numbers by Material Type, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 6‑5: Temporary Restorative Procedure Numbers, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 6‑6: Bonding Procedures, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 6‑7: Core Build-Up Procedure Numbers, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 6‑8: Anesthetic Procedure Numbers, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 7‑1: Dental Cement Market by Segment, U.S., 2019 – 2029 (US$M) |
Figure 7‑2: Total Dental Cement Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 7‑3: Permanent Dental Cement Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 7‑4: Temporary Dental Cement Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 7‑5: Permanent Dental Cement Units Sold by Material Type, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 7‑6: Permanent Dental Cement Units Sold by Delivery Type, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 7‑7: Permanent Dental Cement Units Sold by Curing Method, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 7‑8: Permanent Dental Cement Units Sold by Application Type, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 7‑9: Direct Sales of Dental Cements, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 7‑10: Leading Competitors, Dental Cement Market, U.S., 2022 |
Figure 8‑1: Dental Impression Material Market by Segment, U.S., 2019 – 2029 (US$M) |
Figure 8‑2: Vinyl Polysiloxane Dental Impression Material Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 8‑3: Polyether Dental Impression Material Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 8‑4: Alginate Dental Impression Material Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 8‑5: Other Dental Impression Material Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 8‑6: Dental Impression Units Sold by Material Type, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 8‑7: Dental Impression Units Sold by Delivery Type, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 8‑8: Direct Sales of Dental Impression Materials, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 8‑9: Leading Competitors, Dental Impression Material Market, U.S., 2022 |
Figure 9‑1: Direct Restorative Material Market by Segment, U.S., 2019 – 2029 (US$M) |
Figure 9‑2: Total Direct Restorative Material Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 9‑3: Composite Direct Restorative Material Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 9‑4: Glass/Resin Ionomer Direct Restorative Material Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 9‑5: Amalgam Direct Restorative Material Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 9‑6: Direct Restorative Units Sold by Material Type, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 9‑7: Direct Restorative Units Sold by Delivery Type, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 9‑8: Direct Restorative Units Sold by Curing Method, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 9‑9: Direct Restorative Units Sold by Viscosity, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 9‑10: Direct Sales of Direct Restoratives, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 9‑11: Leading Competitors, Direct Restorative Material Market, U.S., 2022 |
Figure 10‑1: Temporary Restorative Material Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 10‑2: Temporary Restorative Units Sold by Material Type, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 10‑3: Temporary Restorative Units Sold by Curing Method, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 10‑4: Temporary Restorative Units Sold by Delivery Method, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 10‑5: Direct Sales of Temporary Restoratives, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 10‑6: Leading Competitors, Temporary Restorative Material Market, U.S., 2022 |
Figure 11‑1: Dental Bonding Agent Market by Segment, U.S., 2019 – 2029 (US$M) |
Figure 11‑2: Total Dental Bonding Agent Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 11‑3: Total-Etch Dental Bonding Agent Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 11‑4: Self-Etch Dental Bonding Agent Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 11‑5: Universal Dental Bonding Agent Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 11‑6: Dental Bonding Agent Units Sold by Delivery Type, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 11‑7: Dental Bonding Agent Units Sold by Curing Method, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 11‑8: Bonding Agent Units Sold by Application Type, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 11‑9: Direct Sales of Dental Bonding Agents, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 11‑10: Leading Competitors, Dental Bonding Agent Market, U.S., 2022 |
Figure 12‑1: Dental Core Build-Up Material Market by Segment, U.S., 2019 – 2029 (US$M) |
Figure 12‑2: Total Dental Core Build-Up Material Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 12‑3: Composite Resin Dental Core Build-Up Material Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 12‑4: GI and RMGI Dental Core Build-Up Material Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 12‑5: Other Dental Core Build-Up Material Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 12‑6: Dental Core Build-Up Units Sold by Material Type, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 12‑7: Dental Core Build-Up Units Sold by Delivery Type, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 12‑8: Dental Core Build-Up Units Sold by Curing Method, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 12‑9: Direct Sales of Dental Core Build-Up Material, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 12‑10: Leading Competitors, Dental Core Build-Up Material Market, U.S., 2022 |
Figure 13‑1: Dental Anesthetic Market by Segment, U.S., 2019 – 2029 (US$M) |
Figure 13‑2: Topical Dental Anesthetic Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 13‑3: Local Injection Anesthetic Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 13‑4: Dental Anesthetic Units Sold by Drug Type, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
Figure 13‑5: Leading Competitors, Dental Anesthetic Market, U.S., 2022 |
iData’s 9-Step Research Methodology
Our reports follow an in-depth 9-step methodology which focuses on the following research systems:- Original primary research that consists of the most up-to-date market data
- Strong foundation of quantitative and qualitative research
- Focused on the needs and strategic challenges of the industry participants
Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection During this preliminary investigation, all staff members involved in the industry discusses the topic in detail.
Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research The first task of the research team is to prepare for the data collection process: Filing systems and relational databases are developed as needed.
Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design The core of all iData research reports is primary market research. Interviews with industry insiders represent the single most reliable way to obtain accurate, current data about market conditions, trends, threats and opportunities.
Step 4: Performing Primary Research At this stage, interviews are performed using contacts and information acquired in the secondary research phase.
Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates Following the completion of the primary research phase, the collected information must be synthesized into an accurate view of the market status. The most important question is the current state of the market.
Step 6: Market Forecast and Analysis iData Research uses a proprietary method to combine statistical data and opinions of industry experts to forecast future market values.
Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities iData analysts identify in broad terms why some companies are gaining or losing share within a given market segment.
Step 8: Final Review and Market Release An integral part of the iData research methodology is a built-in philosophy of quality control and continuing improvement is integral to the iData philosophy.
Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring iData philosophy of continuous improvement requires that reports and consulting projects be monitored after release for customer feedback and market accuracy.
Explore Options
Report Summary | FREE |
Dental Materials Market Size, Share & COVID-19 Impact Analysis | United States | 2023-2029 | MedSuite | Includes: Dental Cements, Dental Impression Materials, and 5 more
$7,995 – $9,995
The full report suite on the U.S. market for dental materials includes dental cements, dental impression materials, direct restorative materials, temporary restorative materials, dental bonding agents, dental core build-up materials and dental anesthetics.
- 2023
- 10 Years
- United States
- 01/18/2023
- 317
- MedSuite



