| Figure 1‑1: Orthopedic Soft Tissue Repair Market Share Ranking by Segment, U.S., 2022 (1 of 2) |
| Figure 1‑2: Orthopedic Soft Tissue Repair Market Share Ranking by Segment, U.S., 2022 (2 of 2) |
| Figure 1‑3: Companies Researched in this Report |
| Figure 1‑4: Factors Impacting the Orthopedic Soft Tissue Repair Market by Segment, U.S. (1 of 2) |
| Figure 1‑5: Factors Impacting the Orthopedic Soft Tissue Repair Market by Segment, U.S. (2 of 2) |
| Figure 1‑6: Recent Events in the Orthopedic Soft Tissue Repair Market, U.S., 2020 – 2022(1 of 3) |
| Figure 1‑7: Recent Events in the Orthopedic Soft Tissue Repair Market, U.S., 2019 – 2022(2 of 3) |
| Figure 1‑8: Recent Events in the Orthopedic Soft Tissue Repair Market, U.S., 2019 – 2022(3 of 3) |
| Figure 1‑9: Orthopedic Soft Tissue Repair Procedures Covered (1 of 2) |
| Figure 1‑10: Orthopedic Soft Tissue Repair Procedures Covered (2 of 2) |
| Figure 1‑11: Procedure Codes Investigated |
| Figure 1‑12: Orthopedic Soft Tissue Repair Markets Covered |
| Figure 1‑13: Orthopedic Soft Tissue Repair Markets Covered (2 of 2) |
| Figure 1‑14: Key Report Updates |
| Figure 1‑15: Version History |
| Figure 2‑1: Orthopedic Soft Tissue Repair Market by Segment, Worst Case Scenario, U.S., 2019 – 2029 (US$M) |
| Figure 2‑2: Orthopedic Soft Tissue Repair Market by Segment, Base Case Scenario, U.S., 2019 – 2029 (US$M) |
| Figure 2‑3: Orthopedic Soft Tissue Repair Market by Segment, Best Case Scenario, U.S., 2019 – 2029 (US$M) |
| Figure 4‑1: Achilles Tendon Repair by Company (1 of 2) |
| Figure 4‑2: Achilles Tendon Repair by Company (2 of 2) |
| Figure 4‑3: Rotator Cuff Repair by Company (1 of 3) |
| Figure 4‑4: Rotator Cuff Repair by Company (2 of 3) |
| Figure 4‑5: Rotator Cuff Repair by Company (3 of 3) |
| Figure 4‑6: Shoulder Labrum Repair by Company (1 of 2) |
| Figure 4‑7: Shoulder Labrum Repair by Company (2 of 2) |
| Figure 4‑8: Biceps Tenodesis by Company (1 of 2) |
| Figure 4‑9: Biceps Tenodesis by Company (1 of 2) |
| Figure 4‑10: ACL/PCL Repair by Company (1 of 3) |
| Figure 4‑11: ACL/PCL Repair by Company (2 of 3) |
| Figure 4‑11: ACL/PCL Repair by Company (3 of 3) |
| Figure 4‑12: Meniscal repair by Company |
| Figure 4‑13: Hip Arthroscopy by Company (1 of 2) |
| Figure 4‑14: Hip Arthroscopy by Company (2 of 2) |
| Figure 4‑15: Class 2 Device Recall Arthrex SwiveLock Anchor |
| Figure 4‑16: Class 2 Device Recall Arthrex Suture Anchor |
| Figure 4‑17: Class 2 Device Recall Arthrex SwiveLock Anchors |
| Figure 4‑18: Class 2 Device Recall Infinity ACL Tibial Elbow and Tip Guides |
| Figure 4‑19: Class 2 Device Recall KIT_INFINITY_BASE Custom Procedural Kit Italy |
| Figure 4‑20: Class 2 Device Recall KIT_INFINITY_BASE Custom Procedural Kit Italy |
| Figure 4‑21: Class 2 Device Recall INFINITY_TRAY Custom Procedural Kit Canada |
| Figure 4‑22: Class 2 Device Recall PopLok" Knotless Suture Anchor with Disposable Driver |
| Figure 4‑23: Class 2 Device Recall QuickGraft |
| Figure 4‑24: Class 2 Device Recall HEALIX ADVANCE" |
| Figure 4‑25: Class 2 Device Recall HEALICOIL Absorbable Suture anchors |
| Figure 4‑26: Class 2 Device Recall TWINFIX ULTRA Absorbable Suture anchor |
| Figure 4‑27: Class 2 Device Recall TWINFIX 5.0MM AB SUTURE ANCHOR Absorbable Suture anchors |
| Figure 4‑28: Class 2 Device Recall TWINFIX 6.5MM AB PRELOADED ULTRABRAID Absorbable Suture anchors |
| Figure 4‑29: Class 2 Device Recall TWINFIX 6.5MM AB PRELOADED SUTURE ANCHOR Absorbable Suture anchors |
| Figure 4‑30: Class 2 Device Recall TWINFIX AB 5.0 SUTR ANCHR W/2 38 ULTRAAbsorbable Suture anchors |
| Figure 4‑31: Class 2 Device Recall TWINFIX AB 5.0 SUTR ANCHR W/2 38 DURABAbsorbable Suture anchors |
| Figure 4‑32: Class 2 Device Recall RAPTORMITE 3.7MM AB W/ NEEDLES AND TWOAbsorbable Suture anchor |
| Figure 4‑33: Class 2 Device Recall Smith & Nephew FOOTPRINT Ultra Suture Anchor |
| Figure 4‑34: Class 2 Device Recall BIORAPTOR 2.9MM SUTURE ANCHORAbsorbable Suture anchor |
| Figure 4‑35: Class 2 Device Recall MICRORAPTOR REGENESORB SUTURE ANCHOR Absorbable Suture anchor |
| Figure 4‑36: Class 2 Device Recall OSTEORAPTOR |
| Figure 4‑37: Class 2 Device Recall ULTRA FASTFIX AB ASSEMBLY STRAIGHTAbsorbable Suture anchors |
| Figure 4‑38: Class 2 Device Recall SUTUREFIX ULTRA Suture |
| Figure 4‑39: Class 2 Device Recall WHIPKNOT Soft Tissue Cinch |
| Figure 4‑40: Class 2 Device Recall Smith & Nephew |
| Figure 4‑41: Class 2 Device Recall Stryker AllPEEK Knotless Anchor System |
| Figure 4‑42: Class 2 Device Recall ACL DISPOSABLE PACK BONETENDONBONE |
| Figure 4‑43: Class 2 Device Recall STRYKER WEDGE INTERFERENCE SCREW SYSTEM, ACL Interface Screw |
| Figure 4‑44: Class 2 Device Recall CinchLock SS Knotless Anchor with Inserter |
| Figure 4‑45: Class 2 Device Recall ComposiTCP |
| Figure 4‑46: Class 2 Device Recall Gentle Thread PLGA Full Thread Interference Screw |
| Figure 4‑47: Class 2 Device Recall Gentle Threads |
| Figure 4‑48: Class 2 Device Recall Smooth or threaded metallic bone fixation fastener |
| Figure 4‑49: Class 2 Device Recall JUGGERKNOT |
| Figure 4‑50: S&P of Q-Fix™ All-Suture Anchor System |
| Figure 4‑51: Safety and Performance of PEEK Anchors (Dynomite, Spyromite, Raptomite) in Extremities |
| Figure 4‑52: Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Reconstruction With Bone Tendon Bone Autograft With Versus Without Internal Bracing |
| Figure 4‑53: LIVing Donor Allograft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Study (LivD_ACLR) |
| Figure 4‑54: Evaluating the Use of a Bioinductive Graft in Treating Massive Rotator Cuff Tears |
| Figure 4‑55: BIOSURE™ RG Knee Safety & Performance Study |
| Figure 4‑56: Arthroscopic Primary Repair of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) |
| Figure 4‑57: BioCleanse Tibialis Tendon Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Study |
| Figure 4‑58: Individualized Treatment of Acute Achilles Tendon Rupture |
| Figure 4‑59: A RCT for Y-Knot All-suture Anchor in Ankle Ligaments Injury Repair |
| Figure 4‑60: SLAP Repair vs. Biceps Tenodesis in Patients Under 30: A Randomized Clinical Trial |
| Figure 4‑61: A Prospective Study Comparing Suture Anchor and Soft Tissue Pectoralis Major Tendon Techniques for Biceps Tenodesis |
| Figure 4‑62: Biceps Tenodesis Versus Tenotomy (BicepsTvsT) |
| Figure 4‑63: MDR SureLock All-Suture Anchor |
| Figure 4‑64: PMCF Study on PEEK Suture Anchors for Shoulder Indications |
| Figure 4‑65: Rotator Cuff Tears Repair With or Without Dermal Patch Augmentation (CUFFPATCH) |
| Figure 4‑66: Massive Rotator Cuff Tear Reconstruction (SCR) |
| Figure 4‑67: Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction - Study of Different Types of Grafts |
| Figure 4‑68: LifeNet: Extracellular Matrix Graft in Rotator Cuff Repair |
| Figure 4‑69: Allograft Reconstruction of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears vs Partial Repair Alone |
| Figure 4‑70: A Pivotal Study to Assess the InSpace™ Device for Treatment of Full Thickness Massive Rotator Cuff Tears |
| Figure 4‑71: Evaluation of Tendon-to-Bone Healing Potential in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair Through Biological Stimulation |
| Figure 4‑72: Efficacy of an Amniotic Fluid Derived Allograft, (FlōGraft®) in Rotator Cuff Repairs: A Prospective Study |
| Figure 4‑73: Suture Anchor Comparison in Rotator Cuff Repairs |
| Figure 4‑74: Use of Human Dehydrated Umbilical Cord Allograft in Supraspinatus Tendon Repair |
| Figure 4‑75: Evaluation of the Healicoil Suture Anchor for Rotator Cuff Repair |
| Figure 4‑76: SoftStitch™ for All-Inside Meniscal Repair: Comparative Analysis of Patient Reported Outcome Measures |
| Figure 4‑77: Safety and Performance Study of the FAST-FIX FLEX System for Meniscal Repairs and Meniscal Transplantations (FAST-FIX FLEX) |
| Figure 4‑78: JuggerStitch Post Market Clinical Follow-up Study |
| Figure 4‑79: Study of Suture Repair of Torn Meniscus in the Knee |
| Figure 4‑80: Safety and Performance of MICRORAPTOR™ Suture Anchors in Shoulder and Hip |
| Figure 4‑81: HAFAI Cohort 5 Year Follow up of Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy |
| Figure 4‑82: Safety and Performance of the SUTUREFIX ULTRA and SUTUREFIX CURVED Suture Anchors in Shoulder and Hip Arthroscopic Repair (SuturefixUltra) |
| Figure 4‑83: PMCF Study on PEEK Suture Anchors for Hip Indications |
| Figure 5‑1: Orthopedic Soft Tissue Repair Market by Segment, U.S., 2019 – 2029 (US$M) |
| Figure 5‑2: Leading Competitors, Orthopedic Soft Tissue Repair Market, U.S., 2022 (1 of 2) |
| Figure 5‑3: Leading Competitors, Orthopedic Soft Tissue Repair Market, U.S., 2022 (2 of 2) |
| Figure 5‑4: SWOT Analysis, AlloSource |
| Figure 5‑5: SWOT Analysis, Arthrex |
| Figure 5‑6: SWOT Analysis, CONMED |
| Figure 5‑7: SWOT Analysis, DePuy Synthes |
| Figure 5‑8: SWOT Analysis, MTF Biologics |
| Figure 5‑9: SWOT Analysis, RTI Surgical |
| Figure 5‑10: SWOT Analysis, Smith & Nephew (1 of 2) |
| Figure 5‑11: SWOT Analysis, Smith & Nephew (2 of 2) |
| Figure 5‑12: SWOT Analysis, Stryker |
| Figure 5‑13: SWOT Analysis, Zimmer Biomet |
| Figure 6‑1: Procedure Codes Investigated, U.S., 2022 |
| Figure 6‑2: Orthopedic Soft Tissue Repair Procedures by Segment, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 6‑3: Achilles Tendon Repair & Reconstruction Procedures by Care Setting, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 6‑4: Achilles Tendon Repair & Reconstruction Procedures by Surgical Approach, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 6‑5: Rotator Cuff Repair & Reconstruction Procedures by Care Setting, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 6‑6: Rotator Cuff Repair & Reconstruction Procedures by Surgical Approach, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 6‑7: Rotator Cuff Repair & Reconstruction Procedures by Type, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 6‑8: Shoulder Labrum Repair Procedures by Care Setting, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 6‑9: Shoulder Labrum Repair Procedures by Surgical Approach, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 6‑10: Biceps Tenodesis Procedures by Care Setting, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 6‑11: Biceps Tenodesis Procedures by Surgical Approach, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 6‑12: Biceps Tenodesis Procedures by Type, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 6‑13: ACL/PCL Reconstruction Procedures by Care Setting, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 6‑14: ACL/PCL Reconstruction Procedures by Surgical Approach, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 6‑15: ACL/PCL Reconstruction Procedures by Graft Type, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 6‑16: Allograft ACL/PCL Reconstruction Procedures by Type, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 6‑17: Meniscal Procedures by Care Setting, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 6‑18: Meniscal Procedures by Surgical Approach, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 6‑19: Meniscal Procedures by Type, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 6‑20: Meniscal Repair Procedures by Type, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 6‑21: Meniscal Repair Procedures by Surgical Technique, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 6‑22: Hip Arthroscopy Procedures by Care Setting, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 7‑1: Achilles Tendon Repair & Reconstruction Market by Segment, U.S., 2019 – 2029 (US$M) |
| Figure 7‑2: Achilles Tendon Graft Market by Segment, U.S., 2019 – 2029 (US$M) |
| Figure 7‑3: Total Achilles Tendon Graft Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 7‑4: Allograft Achilles Tendon Graft Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 7‑5: Xenograft Achilles Tendon Graft Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 7‑6: Synthetic Achilles Tendon Graft Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 7‑7: Achilles Tendon Suture Anchor Market by Segment, U.S., 2019 – 2029 (US$M) |
| Figure 7‑8: Total Achilles Tendon Suture Anchor Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 7‑9: Biocomposite Achilles Tendon Suture Anchor Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 7‑10: PEEK Achilles Tendon Suture Anchor Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 7‑11: Metal Achilles Tendon Suture Anchor Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 7‑12: Leading Competitors, Achilles Tendon Repair & Reconstruction Market, U.S., 2022 |
| Figure 7‑13: Leading Competitors, Achilles Tendon Graft Market, U.S., 2022 |
| Figure 7‑14: Leading Competitors, Achilles Tendon Suture Anchor Market, U.S., 2022 |
| Figure 8‑1: Rotator Cuff Repair & Reconstruction Market by Segment, U.S., 2019 – 2029 (US$M) |
| Figure 8‑2: Rotator Cuff Graft Market by Segment, U.S., 2019 – 2029 (US$M) |
| Figure 8‑3: Total Rotator Cuff Graft Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 8‑4: Allograft Rotator Cuff Graft Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 8‑5: Xenograft Rotator Cuff Graft Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 8‑6: Synthetic Rotator Cuff Graft Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 8‑7: Rotator Cuff Suture Anchor Market by Segment, U.S., 2019 – 2029 (US$M) |
| Figure 8‑8: Total Rotator Cuff Suture Anchor Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 8‑9: PLA Suture Anchor Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 8‑10: Biocomposite Suture Anchor Market, U.S., 2022 – 2029 |
| Figure 8‑11: PEEK Suture Anchor Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 8‑12: PEEK Carbon Fiber Suture Anchor Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 8‑13: Metal Suture Anchor Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 8‑14: All-Suture Anchor Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 8‑15: Units Sold by Design, Rotator Cuff Suture Anchor Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 8‑16: Leading Competitors, Rotator Cuff Repair & Reconstruction Market, U.S., 2022 |
| Figure 8‑17: Leading Competitors, Rotator Cuff Graft Market, U.S., 2022 |
| Figure 8‑18: Leading Competitors, Rotator Cuff Suture Anchor Market, U.S., 2022 |
| Figure 9‑1: Shoulder Labrum Repair Market by Segment, U.S., 2019 – 2029 (US$M) |
| Figure 9‑2: Shoulder Labrum Repair Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 9‑3: PLA Suture Anchor Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 9‑4: Biocomposite Suture Anchor Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 9‑5: PEEK Suture Anchor Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 9‑6: PEEK Carbon Fiber Suture Anchor Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 9‑7: Metal Suture Anchor Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 9‑8: Units Sold by Design, Shoulder Labrum Repair Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 9‑9: Leading Competitors, Shoulder Labrum Repair Market, U.S., 2022 |
| Figure 10‑1: Biceps Tenodesis Market by Segment, U.S., 2019 – 2029 (US$M) |
| Figure 10‑2: Biceps Tenodesis Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 10‑3: Biceps Tenodesis Suture Anchor Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 10‑4: Biceps Tenodesis Screw Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 10‑5: Leading Competitors, Biceps Tenodesis Market, U.S., 2022 |
| Figure 11‑1: ACL/PCL Reconstruction Market by Segment, U.S., 2019 – 2029 (US$M) |
| Figure 11‑2: ACL/PCL Allograft Market by Segment, U.S., 2019 – 2029 (US$M) |
| Figure 11‑3: Total ACL/PCL Allograft Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 11‑4: BTB Allograft Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 11‑5: Non-Sutured Soft Tissue Allograft Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 11‑6: Pre-Sutured Soft Tissue Allograft Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 11‑7: ACL/PCL Fixation Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2019 – 2029 (US$M) |
| Figure 11‑8: Total ACL/PCL Fixation Device Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 11‑9: Interference Screw Market by Segment, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 11‑10: Biocomposite Interference Screw Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 11‑11: PEEK Interference Screw Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 11‑12: Metal Interference Screw Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 11‑13: PLA Interference Screw Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 11‑14: Intratunnel Fixation Device Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 11‑15: Washer and Post Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 11‑16: Cross-Pin Market by Segment, U.S., 2019 – 2029 (US$M) |
| Figure 11‑17: Resorbable Cross-Pin Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 11‑18: Non-Resorbable Cross-Pin Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 11‑19: Cortical Fixation Device Market by Segment, U.S., 2019 – 2029 (US$M) |
| Figure 11‑20: Fixed Loop Cortical Fixation Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 11‑21: Adjustable Loop Cortical Fixation Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 11‑22: Leading Competitors, ACL/PCL Reconstruction Market, U.S., 2022 |
| Figure 11‑23: Leading Competitors, ACL/PCL Allograft Market, U.S., 2022 |
| Figure 11‑24: Leading Competitors, ACL/PCL Fixation Device Market, U.S., 2022 |
| Figure 12‑1: Meniscal Repair Market by Segment, U.S., 2019 – 2029 (US$M) |
| Figure 12‑2: Meniscal Repair Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 12‑3: Implant Meniscal Repair Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 12‑4: Suture Meniscal Repair Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 12‑5: Hybrid Meniscal Repair Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 12‑6: Leading Competitors, Meniscal Repair Market, U.S., 2022 |
| Figure 13‑1: Hip Arthroscopy Market by Segment, U.S., 2019 – 2029 (US$M) |
| Figure 13‑2: RF Probe Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 13‑3: RF Probe Market by Segment, U.S., 2019 – 2029 (US$M) |
| Figure 13‑4: Articulating RF Probe Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 13‑5: Static RF Probe Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 13‑6: Banana Blade Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 13‑7: Hip Access Kit Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 13‑8: Suture Anchor Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
| Figure 13‑9: Disposable Kit Market, U.S., 2019 – 2029 |
