https://idataresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/ReportIcon-Vascular-MC.jpg

Port Needles Market Analysis | India | 2017-2023 | MedCore

  • Year: 2017
  • Scope: 2013-2023
  • Region: India
  • Pages: 360
  • Published Date: 1/1/2017
  • Type: MedCore

Unit sales for port needles are expected to decline in Indian over the forecast period due to intense competition from local competitors as well as from low-cost producers in China and Korea.

The largest segment in the total port needle market was the conventional port needles, which accounted for the vast majority of the total market value. However, safety port needles are growing at a much faster pace than conventional port needles. Conventional port needles are expected to continue its dominance in the port needle market in the foreseeable future.

Segments Covered in This Market

  • Conventional Port Needle Market
  • Safety Port Needle Market

Report Data Types Included

  • Unit Sales, Average Selling Prices, Market Value & Growth Trends
  • 10 Year Scope (3 Year Historical + 7 Year Forecast Period)
  • Market Drivers & Limiters for Each Segment
  • Competitive Analysis with Market Shares
  • Product Portfolios
  • Related Press Releases from Top Competitors

Companies Analyzed

Of the many companies in the Indian Port Needle market, C. R. Bard was the leader, followed by Smiths Medical and Vygon. Bard’s products include the LiftLoc™, MiniLoc® and the PowerLoc®. All three of these products were supplied on a private-label basis to Bard before their 2008 merger. Other notable competitors in this segment include B. Braun.

About Our In-Depth MedCore Research

Our analysts meticulously research for up to 3 to 4 months to put together one suite of reports (MedSuite), which is a comprehensive analysis on a group of healthcare markets. A MedCore is one portion of that analysis that focuses on one market segment, and provides further detailed segmentation to get a much more granular set of market data.

This MedCore is also found in the full report suite titled India Market Report Suite for Vascular Access Devices and Accessories – MedSuite

Learn More about these product types

TABLE OF CONTENTS I
LIST OF FIGURES XVI
LIST OF CHARTS XIX
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
INDIA VASCULAR ACCESS DEVICE AND ACCESSORIES MARKET OVERVIEW 1
COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS 4
MARKET TRENDS 6
MARKET DEVELOPMENTS 7
MARKETS INCLUDED 8
KEY REPORT UPDATES 9
VERSION HISTORY 9
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 10
1.1 RESEARCH SCOPE 10
1.2 IDATA’S 9-STEP METHODOLOGY 10
Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection 10
Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research 12
Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design 13
Step 4: Performing Primary Research 14
Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates 16
Step 6: Market Forecast and Analysis 17
Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities 19
Step 8: Final Review and Market Release 20
Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring 21
DISEASE OVERVIEW 22
2.1 BASIC ANATOMY 22
2.1.1 Human Vascular System 22
2.2 VASCULAR PATHOLOGY AND DISORDERS 23
2.2.1 Cancer 23
2.2.2 End-Stage Renal Disease 24
2.2.3 Diabetes 26
PRODUCT ASSESSMENT 29
3.1 PRODUCT PORTFOLIOS 29
3.1.1 Port Needles 29
3.1.1.1 Introduction 29
3.1.1.2 AngioDynamics 30
3.1.1.2.1 LifeGuard® 30
3.1.1.2.2 LifePort® 30
3.1.1.3 B. Braun 30
3.1.1.3.1 WHIN® 30
3.1.1.4 Cook Medical 30
3.1.1.4.1 Vital-Ject™ 30
3.1.1.5 C. R. Bard 30
3.1.1.5.1 PowerLoc® 30
3.1.1.5.2 Other Port Needle Offerings 31
3.1.1.6 Kawasumi 31
3.1.1.6.1 K-Shield® 31
3.1.1.6.2 Other Port Needle Offerings 31
3.1.1.7 MPS Medical, Inc. 31
3.1.1.7.1 SmartSafety® 31
3.1.1.8 Nipro Medical 31
3.1.1.8.1 SafeTouch™ 31
3.1.1.9 Smiths Medical 32
3.1.1.9.1 GRIPPER® 32
3.1.1.9.2 GRIPPER PLUS® 32
3.1.1.9.3 Other Port Needle Offerings 32
3.1.1.10 Vygon (Churchill Medical Systems) 32
3.1.1.10.1 LifeGuard™ 32
3.1.1.10.2 Wing Safe™ 32
3.2 REGULATORY ISSUES AND RECALLS 33
3.2.1 November 2015 33
3.2.2 October 2015 33
3.2.3 September 2015 34
3.2.4 August 2015 36
3.2.5 July 2015 37
3.2.6 April 2015 39
3.2.7 March 2015 40
3.2.8 February 2015 41
3.2.9 January 2015 41
3.2.10 December 2014 42
3.2.11 October 2014 43
3.2.12 September 2014 44
3.2.13 May 2014 45
3.2.14 April 2014 45
3.2.15 March 2014 46
3.2.16 January 2014 46
3.2.17 December 2013 47
3.2.18 September 2013 48
3.2.19 August 2013 49
3.2.20 June 2013 49
3.2.21 March 2013 50
3.2.22 February 2013 51
3.2.23 December 2012 51
3.2.24 August 2012 51
3.2.25 June 2012 52
3.2.26 May 2012 53
3.2.27 March 2012 54
3.2.28 February 2012 55
3.2.29 January 2012 55
3.3 PRODUCT PIPELINES 59
3.3.1 Alliance Vascular Devices, LLC 59
3.3.1.1 FreeHand Safety Huber Needle® 59
3.3.2 AngioDynamics 59
3.3.2.1 Celerity™ PICC Tip Confirmation System with Navigation 59
3.3.2.2 Firefly 59
3.3.2.3 BioFlo® PICC Line Extension 60
3.3.2.4 BioFlo® Port Line Extension 60
3.3.2.5 Next Generation BioFlo® PICC 60
3.3.2.6 Next Generation BioFlo® Port 60
3.3.3 Bluegrass Vascular Technologies, Inc. 60
3.3.3.1 Surfacer® Inside-Out™ Access System 60
3.3.4 C.R. Bard 60
3.3.4.1 Chemical-Resistant PICCs 60
3.3.4.2 Novel Advanced Material PICCs 61
3.3.4.3 PowerGlide® Pro Midline 61
3.3.4.4 AccuCath® 61
3.3.4.5 Xenesis™ Acute Hemodialysis Catheter 61
3.3.4.6 Site~Rite® 8 Ultrasound System 61
3.3.5 M. C. Johnson 61
3.3.5.1 PICC Securement Device 61
3.3.6 Nipro Medical 62
3.3.6.1 Shielding Safety Needle 62
3.3.6.2 Safety Syringe 62
3.3.6.3 Safety PIVC 62
3.3.7 Parasol Medical 62
3.3.7.1 Catheter Securement Device 62
3.3.8 PAVmed Inc. 62
3.3.8.1 NextCath™ 62
3.3.9 Phase One Medical 62
3.3.9.1 Goldilocks™ Long Term Hemodialysis Catheter 62
3.3.9.2 Triple-Lumen Symetrex™ Hemodialysis Catheter 63
3.3.10 Prodigy Diabetes Care, LLC. 63
3.3.10.1 Insulin Pen Needles 63
3.3.11 Sharklet Technologies, Inc. 63
3.3.11.1 Sharklet™ Central Venous Catheter 63
3.3.12 Starboard Medical 63
3.3.12.1 Catheter Securement Devices 63
3.3.13 Teleflex Medical 64
3.3.13.1 Arrow® Endurance™ Extended Dwell Peripheral Catheter System 64
3.3.13.2 Tip Confirmation for CVCs, Chronic Hemodialysis Catheters & Ports 64
3.3.14 Vascular Access Technologies, Inc. 64
3.3.14.1 SAFECVAD™ 64
PORT NEEDLE MARKET 65
4.1 MARKET OVERVIEW 65
4.2 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 68
4.2.1 Total Port Needle Market 68
4.2.2 Conventional Implantable Port Market 70
4.2.3 Safety Port Needle Market 72
4.3 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 74
4.3.1 Market Drivers 74
4.3.2 Market Limiters 75
4.4 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 77
ABBREVIATIONS 79
APPENDIX: COMPANY PRESS RELEASES 80
The "India Market Report Suite for Vascular Access Devices and Accessories 2017 - MedSuite" includes analysis on the following companies currently active in this market:
Teleflex Medical
Poly Medicure
B. Braun
Becton Dickinson
C. R. Bard
Covidien
Smiths Medical
Others include: Cardinal Health, Cook Medical, GE Healthcare, Manohar International, Medcomp, Medikit, Covidien, Nipro Medical, PFM Medical, Poly Medicure Limited, Terumo, Toshiba, Vygon, etc.
*Not all companies are currently active in every segment or sub-report from this suite. For more details contact an iData Research Product Advisor.
Chart 1 1: Vascular Access Device and Accessories Market by Segment, India, 2013 – 2023 2
Chart 1 2: Vascular Access Device and Accessories Market by Segment, India, 2016 & 2023 3
Chart 4 1: Port Needle Market by Segment, India, 2013 – 2023 66
Chart 4 2: Port Needle Market Breakdown, India, 2016 67
Chart 4 3: Port Needle Market Breakdown, India, 2023 67
Chart 4 4: Total Port Needle Market, India, 2013 – 2023 69
Chart 4 5: Conventional Port Needle Market, India, 2013 – 2023 71
Chart 4 6: Safety Port Needle Market, India, 2013 – 2023 73
Chart 4 7: Leading Competitors, Port Needle Market, India, 2016 78

Figure 1 1: Vascular Access Device and Accessories Market by Segment India, 2016 (1 of 2) 4
Figure 1 2: Vascular Access Device and Accessories Market by Segment India, 2016 (2 of 2) 4
Figure 1 3: Companies Researched in this Report, India, 2016 5
Figure 1 4: Factors Impacting the Vascular Access Device and Accessories Market by Segment, India 6
Figure 1 5: Recent Events in the Vascular Access Device and Accessories MarketIndia, 2012 – 2016 7
Figure 1 6: Vascular Access Device and Accessories Markets Covered, India, 2016 8
Figure 1 7: Key Report Updates 9
Figure 1 8: Version History 9
Figure 3 1: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic 33
Figure 3 2: Class 2 Device Recall Smiths Medical 33
Figure 3 3: Class 2 Device Recall Arrow 34
Figure 3 4: Class 2 Device Recall Arrow 34
Figure 3 5: Class 2 Device Recall Covidien (Medtronic) 35
Figure 3 6: Class 2 Device Recall Arrow 36
Figure 3 7: Class 2 Device Recall Medline 36
Figure 3 8: Class 2 Device Recall Arrow 36
Figure 3 9: Class 2 Device Recall B. Braun 36
Figure 3 10: Class 3 Device Recall Bard Access 37
Figure 3 11: Class 2 Device Recall Covidien (Medtronic) 37
Figure 3 12: Class 2 Device Recall Bard Access 39
Figure 3 13: Class 2 Device Recall Bard Access 39
Figure 3 14: Class 2 Device Recall Medcomp & AngioDynamics 40
Figure 3 15: Class 2 Device Recall Bard Access 40
Figure 3 16: Class 2 Device Recall Arrow 41
Figure 3 17: Class 2 Device Recall Medcomp 41
Figure 3 18: Class 2 Device Recall Arrow 41
Figure 3 19: Class 2 Device Recall Arrow 42
Figure 3 20: Class 2 Device Recall Smiths Medical 42
Figure 3 21: Class 2 Device Recall PFM Medical 42
Figure 3 22: Class 2 Device Recall PFM Medical 42
Figure 3 23: Class 2 Device Recall Becton Dickinson 43
Figure 3 24: Class 2 Device Recall Arrow 43
Figure 3 25: Class 2 Device Recall Arrow 43
Figure 3 26: Class 2 Device Recall Navilyst Medical 43
Figure 3 27: Class 2 Device Recall Argon Medical 44
Figure 3 28: Class 2 Device Recall Arrow 45
Figure 3 29: Class 2 Device Recall Arrow 45
Figure 3 30: Class 2 Device Recall Arrow 46
Figure 3 31: Class 2 Device Recall Bard Access 46
Figure 3 32: Class 2 Device Recall Navilyst Medical 46
Figure 3 33: Class 2 Device Recall Bard Access 47
Figure 3 34: Class 2 Device Recall Smiths Medical 47
Figure 3 35: Class 2 Device Recall B. Braun 47
Figure 3 36: Class 2 Device Recall Smiths Medical 48
Figure 3 37: Class 2 Device Recall Access Scientific 48
Figure 3 38: Class 2 Device Recall Covidien (Medtronic) 48
Figure 3 39: Class 2 Device Recall Arrow 49
Figure 3 40: Class 2 Device Recall Bard Access 49
Figure 3 41: Class 2 Device Recall Becton Dickinson 49
Figure 3 42: Class 2 Device Recall Churchill Medical Systems, Inc. A Vygon Company 50
Figure 3 43: Class 2 Device Recall Bard Access 50
Figure 3 44: Class 2 Device Recall Churchill Medical Systems, Inc. A Vygon Company 50
Figure 3 45: Class 2 Device Recall Medcomp 51
Figure 3 46: Class 2 Device Recall Becton Dickinson 51
Figure 3 47: Class 3 Device Recall Bard Access 51
Figure 3 48: Class 2 Device Recall Medcomp 52
Figure 3 49: Class 1 Device Recall Arrow 52
Figure 3 50: Class 2 Device Recall Arrow 52
Figure 3 51: Class 2 Device Recall Vygon 52
Figure 3 52: Class 2 Device Recall Covidien (Medtronic) 53
Figure 3 53: Class 2 Device Recall Medcomp 54
Figure 3 54: Class 2 Device Recall Churchill Medical Systems, Inc. A Vygon Company 54
Figure 3 55: Class 2 Device Recall Christie Medical Holdings 54
Figure 3 56: Class 3 Recall Bard Access 54
Figure 3 57: Class 2 Device Recall AngioDynamics 55
Figure 3 58: Class 2 Device Recall Becton Dickinson 55
Figure 3 59: Class 2 Device Recall AngioDynamics 55
Figure 3 60: Class 2 Device Recall AngioDynamics 57
Figure 3 61: Class 3 Device Recall AngioDynamics 58
Figure 3 62: Class 2 Device Recall AngioDynamics 58
Figure 4 1: Port Needle Market by Segment, India, 2013 – 2023 (US$M) 65
Figure 4 2: Port Needle Market by Segment, India, 2013 – 2023 (IN?M) 66
Figure 4 3: Total Port Needle Market, India, 2013 – 2023 68
Figure 4 4: Conventional Port Needle Market, India, 2013 – 2023 70
Figure 4 5: Safety Port Needle Market, India, 2013 – 2023 72
Figure 4 6: Drivers and Limiters, Port Needle Market, India, 2016 76
Figure 4 7: Leading Competitors, Port Needle Market, India, 2016 78
Figure 6 1: Press Release Summary 80

iData’s 9-Step Research Methodology

Our reports follow an in-depth 9-step methodology which focuses on the following research systems:

  • Original primary research that consists of the most up-to-date market data
  • Strong foundation of quantitative and qualitative research
  • Focused on the needs and strategic challenges of the industry participants

Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection During this preliminary investigation, all staff members involved in the industry discusses the topic in detail.

Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research The first task of the research team is to prepare for the data collection process: Filing systems and relational databases are developed as needed.

Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design The core of all iData research reports is primary market research. Interviews with industry insiders represent the single most reliable way to obtain accurate, current data about market conditions, trends, threats and opportunities.

Step 4: Performing Primary Research At this stage, interviews are performed using contacts and information acquired in the secondary research phase.

Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates Following the completion of the primary research phase, the collected information must be synthesized into an accurate view of the market status. The most important question is the current state of the market.

Step 6: Market Forecast and Analysis iData Research uses a proprietary method to combine statistical data and opinions of industry experts to forecast future market values.

Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities iData analysts identify in broad terms why some companies are gaining or losing share within a given market segment.

Step 8: Final Review and Market Release An integral part of the iData research methodology is a built-in philosophy of quality control and continuing improvement is integral to the iData philosophy.

Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring iData philosophy of continuous improvement requires that reports and consulting projects be monitored after release for customer feedback and market accuracy.

Click Here to Read More About Our Methodology