https://idataresearch.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/E01F7CEF-3014-4819-B4BB-74C01A80CB63.jpeg

Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Size, Share & COVID-19 Impact Analysis | Australia | 2022-2028 | MedSuite | Includes: Interbody Spinal Surgery Devices, Pedicle Screws, and 4 more

  • Year: 2022
  • Scope: 10 Years
  • Region: Australia
  • Type: MedSuite

Australia’s minimally invasive spinal implant market was valued at $94 million in 2021. This is expected to increase over the forecast period at a CAGR of 16.8% to reach $164 million.

The full report suite on the Australian market for minimally invasive spinal implants includes minimally invasive spinal (MIS) interbody devices, MIS pedicle screws, spinous process fixation, SI joint fusion, spine endoscopes, spine endoscope and MIS surgical instrumentation.

MARKET REPORT DATA TYPES INCLUDED

  • Unit Sales, Average Selling Prices, Market Value & Growth Trends
  • Forecasts Until 2028, and Historical Data to 2018
  • Market Drivers & Limiters for Each Segment
  • Competitive Analysis with Market Shares for Each Segment
  • Recent Mergers & Acquisitions
  • Procedure Volumes
  • Company Profiles, Product Portfolios and SWOT for Top Competitors
  • COVID-19 Impact Analysis

COVID-19 IMPACT ANALYSIS ON THE AUSTRALIAN MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL IMPLANTS MARKET

In June 2020, the majority of suspended surgeries had the ability to be rescheduled and completed over the latter half of the 2020 and into early 2021. Overall, procedures declined in the high single digits, as a result of public health initiatives to ease the stress on public hospitals. Starting late in 2021, cases began to increase as a result of the increase in COVID-19 variants that have a higher infection rate than that of the original strain. Through the implementation of public health measures and the reduced hospitalization rates of the vaccinated population, the pressure on hospitals caused by the rise in new COVID-19 variant cases will be limited.

AUSTRALIA’S MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL IMPLANT MARKET SHARE INSIGHTS

Overall, within the Australian Minimally Invasive Spinal Implants market there are two dominant competitors: Medtronic, DePuy Synthes, and NuVasive.Australia MIS top companiesMedtronic was the leading competitor in the Australian MIS market. This was a result of having the largest share in the MIS interbody and MIS pedicle screw market segments. The company held the second-leading share in the facet fixation and MIS sacroiliac joint fusion market.

MARKET SEGMENTATION SUMMARY

While this report suite contains all applicable market data, each of the markets are also available as stand alone MedCore reports. This allows you to get access to only the specific market segment research that you need. You can view all these included reports and segmentation here:

  • Procedure Volumes for Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery – MedPro – Using a number of databases, internal and external, we’re able to provide you with the total volume of minimally invasive spinal implants procedures being performed for each of the markets mentioned in this suite of reports.
  • MIS Interbody Device Market – MedCore – Covers segmentation into the MIPLIF Market, MITLIF Market, LLIF Market, and OLIF Market.
  • MIS Pedicle Screw Market – MedCore – Segmented into 2 main markets: Percutaneous Cannulated Pedicle Screws and Retractor MIS Pedicle Screws.
  • Spinous Process Fixation Market – MedCore – This market covers several spinal fixation systems including both plating and rod and screws systems.
  • Facet Fixation Market – MedCore – Facet fixation is a type of percutaneous minimally invasive surgery in which the facet joints in the thoracolumbar region are fused using facet screws, bolts or allograft dowels.
  • MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Market – MedCore – SIJD can also be known as SI joint syndrome, SI joint strain and SI joint inflammation. Surgical treatment involves fusing the SI joint via an open surgery approach.
  • Spinal Endoscopy Market – MedCore – Spine endoscopes are visualization instrumen
    ts that allow for a minimally invasive approach to various procedures and resemble other arthroscopic and laparoscopic devices.
  • MIS Surgery Instrumentation Market – MedCore – Spinal instrumentation is used to stabilize the spine and carry out the procedure during minimally invasive spinal (MIS) procedures.

Research Scope Summary

Report Attribute Details
Regions Australia
Base Year 2021
Forecast 2022-2028
Historical Data 2018-2021
Quantitative Coverage Market Size, Procedure Volume, Market Shares, Market Forecasts, Market Growth Rates, Units Sold, and Average Selling Prices.
Qualitative Coverage COVID-19 Impact, Market Growth Trends, Market Limiters, Competitive Analysis & SWOT for Top Competitors, Mergers & Acquisitions, Company Profiles, Product Portfolios
Data Sources Primary Interviews with Industry Leaders, Government Physician Data, Regulatory Data, Hospital Private Data, Import & Export Data, iData Research Internal Database.

FREE Sample Report

 

Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS I
LIST OF FIGURES IX
LIST OF CHARTS XIV
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1
AUSTRALIA MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL IMPLANT MARKET OVERVIEW 1
COMPETITIVE ANALYSIS 4
MARKET TRENDS 6
MARKET DEVELOPMENTS 8
PROCEDURE NUMBERS 10
MARKETS INCLUDED 11
KEY REPORT UPDATES 12
VERSION HISTORY 12
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 13
Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection 13
Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research 16
Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design 18
Step 4: Performing Primary Research 19
Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates 21
Step 6: Market Forecast and Analysis 22
Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities 24
Step 8: Final Review and Market Release 25
Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring 26
IMPACT OF COVID-19 ON THE AUSTRALIA MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL IMPLANT MARKET 27
2.1 INTRODUCTION 27
2.2 ANALYSIS BY MARKET SEGMENT 29
2.2.1 Worst Case Scenario 29
2.2.2 Base Case Scenario 30
2.2.3 Best Case Scenario 31
DISEASE OVERVIEW 33
3.1 INTRODUCTION 33
3.1.1 Degenerative Disc Disease 33
3.1.1.1 Disc Herniation 33
3.1.1.2 Stenosis 34
3.1.1.3 Spondyloisthesis 34
3.1.1.4 Arthritis 35
3.1.2 Spinal Deformities 35
3.1.2.1 Scoliosis 35
3.1.2.2 Kyphosis and Lordosis 36
3.1.3 Trauma and Tumor 37
3.1.4 Vertebral Compression Fractures 37
3.1.4.1 Osteoporosis 37
3.1.4.2 Vertebral Compression Fractures 38
PRODUCT ASSESSMENT 39
4.1 INTRODUCTION 39
4.2 PRODUCT PORTFOLIOS 39
4.2.1 Cervical Fixation 39
4.2.1.1 Anterior Cervical Fixation 40
4.2.1.1.1 Constrained 40
4.2.1.1.2 Semi-Constrained 40
4.2.1.1.3 Dynamic 40
4.2.1.1.4 Bioresorbable 41
4.2.1.2 Posterior Cervical Fixation 41
4.2.2 Facet Fixation 44
4.2.3 Interbody Devices 46
4.2.3.1 Approaches 46
4.2.3.1.1 ALIF 46
4.2.3.1.2 PLIF 47
4.2.3.1.3 TLIF 47
4.2.3.1.4 Minimally Invasive PLIF 47
4.2.3.1.5 Minimally Invasive TLIF 48
4.2.3.1.6 LLIF 48
4.2.3.1.7 OLIF 48
4.2.3.1.8 Cervical 48
4.2.3.1.9 VBR/Corpectomy 49
4.2.3.2 Materials 49
4.2.3.2.1 Metal 49
4.2.3.2.2 PEEK 49
4.2.3.2.3 Machined Bone Allograft 49
4.2.4 MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion 53
4.2.5 Motion Preservation Devices 55
4.2.5.1 Artificial Discs 55
4.2.5.2 Dynamic Stabilization 55
4.2.5.2.1 Posterior Dynamic Stabilization 55
4.2.5.2.2 Interspinous Process Decompression 55
4.2.5.2.3 Nucleus Replacement 56
4.2.5.2.4 Facet Arthroplasty 56
4.2.6 Spinous Process Fixation 59
4.2.7 Spinal Electrical Stimulation Devices 61
4.2.8 Spine Endoscopes 63
4.2.9 Thoracolumbar Fixation 65
4.2.9.1 Traditional Systems 65
4.2.9.2 Minimally Invasive Systems 65
4.2.10 Vertebral Compression Fracture Devices 69
4.2.10.1 Percutaneous Vertebroplasty 69
4.2.10.2 Percutaneous Vertebral Augmentation Including Kyphoplasty 70
4.3 REGULATORY ISSUES AND RECALLS 72
4.3.1 Medtronic 72
4.3.2 VGI Medical 73
4.3.3 Zimmer Biomet 74
4.4 CLINICAL TRIALS 77
4.4.1 Cervical Fixation 77
4.4.1.1 Other Companies 77
4.4.2 Interbody Devices 78
4.4.2.1 Other Companies 78
4.4.3 Facet Fixation 80
4.4.3.1 Medtronic 80
4.4.3.2 Other Companies 81
4.4.4 Percutaneous Vertebroplasty 81
4.4.4.1 Other Companies 81
AUSTRALIA MINIMALLY INVASIVE SPINAL IMPLANT MARKET OVERVIEW 83
5.1 INTRODUCTION 83
5.1.1 Minimally Invasive Interbody Fusion 83
5.1.1.1 Minimally Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion 84
5.1.1.2 Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion 85
5.1.1.3 Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion 85
5.1.1.4 Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion 86
5.1.2 Minimally Invasive Surgery Pedicle Screws 86
5.1.2.1 Percutaneous MIS Systems 86
5.1.2.2 Retractor-Based MIS Systems 87
5.1.3 Spinous Process Fixation 87
5.1.4 Facet Fixation 87
5.1.5 MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion 88
5.1.6 MIS Spine Endoscopes 88
5.2 CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATE 89
5.3 MARKET OVERVIEW & TREND ANALYSIS 90
5.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 94
5.4.1 Market Drivers 94
5.4.2 Market Limiters 95
5.5 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 97
5.6 MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS 104
5.7 COMPANY PROFILES 107
5.7.1 DePuy Synthes 107
5.7.2 Globus Medical 108
5.7.3 Joimax 110
5.7.4 Medtronic 111
5.7.5 NuVasive 112
5.7.6 SI-BONE 113
5.7.7 Stryker 114
5.7.8 VGI Medical 115
5.7.9 Zimmer Biomet 116
5.8 SWOT ANALYSIS 118
5.8.1 DePuy Synthes 119
5.8.2 Globus Medical 120
5.8.3 Joimax 121
5.8.4 Medtronic 122
5.8.5 NuVasive 123
5.8.6 SI-BONE 125
5.8.7 Stryker 126
5.8.8 VGI Medical 128
5.8.9 Zimmer Biomet 129
PROCEDURE NUMBERS 130
6.1 INTRODUCTION 130
6.2 PROCEDURES 131
6.2.1 MIS Interbody Device Procedures 134
6.2.1.1 MIPLIF Procedures 138
6.2.1.2 MITLIF Procedures 139
6.2.1.3 LLIF Procedures 140
6.2.1.4 OLIF Procedures 141
6.2.2 MIS Pedicle Screw Procedures 142
6.2.2.1 Percutaneous Cannulated Pedicle Screw Procedures 145
6.2.2.2 Retractor Cannulated Pedicle Screw Procedures 146
6.2.2.3 Retractor Non-Cannulated Pedicle Screw Procedures 147
6.2.3 Spinous Process Fixation Procedures 148
6.2.4 Facet Fixation Procedures 149
6.2.5 MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Procedures 150
6.2.6 Spine Endoscope Procedures 151
MIS INTERBODY DEVICE MARKET 152
7.1 INTRODUCTION 152
7.1.1 Approach Types 153
7.1.1.1 Minimally Invasive Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion 153
7.1.1.2 Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion 153
7.1.1.3 Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion 154
7.1.1.4 Direct Lateral Interbody Fusion 154
7.1.1.5 eXtreme Lateral Interbody Fusion 154
7.1.1.6 Guided Lateral Interbody Fusion 155
7.1.1.7 Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion 155
7.2 MARKET OVERVIEW 156
7.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 159
7.3.1 MIS Interbody Device Market 159
7.3.2 MIPLIF Market 160
7.3.3 MITLIF Market 162
7.3.4 LLIF Market 164
7.3.5 OLIF Market 166
7.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 168
7.4.1 Market Drivers 168
7.4.2 Market Limiters 169
7.5 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 170
MIS PEDICLE SCREW MARKET 174
8.1 INTRODUCTION 174
8.1.1 Percutaneous MIS Systems 174
8.1.2 Retractor-Based MIS Systems 175
8.2 MARKET OVERVIEW 176
8.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 180
8.3.1 MIS Pedicle Screw Market 180
8.3.2 Percutaneous Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market 182
8.3.3 Retractor Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market 184
8.3.4 Retractor Non-Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market 186
8.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 188
8.4.1 Market Drivers 188
8.4.2 Market Limiters 189
8.5 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 191
SPINOUS PROCESS FIXATION MARKET 195
9.1 INTRODUCTION 195
9.2 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 196
9.3 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 199
9.3.1 Market Drivers 199
9.3.2 Market Limiters 200
9.4 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 202
FACET FIXATION MARKET 205
10.1 INTRODUCTION 205
10.2 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 206
10.3 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 209
10.3.1 Market Drivers 209
10.3.2 Market Limiters 210
10.4 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 211
MIS SI JOINT FUSION MARKET 214
11.1 INTRODUCTION 214
11.2 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 216
11.3 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 219
11.3.1 Market Drivers 219
11.3.2 Market Limiters 219
11.4 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 221
SPINE ENDOSCOPE MARKET 224
12.1 INTRODUCTION 224
12.2 MARKET OVERVIEW 225
12.3 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 228
12.3.1 Spine Endoscope Market 228
12.3.2 Instrumentation Market 229
12.4 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 231
12.4.1 Market Drivers 231
12.4.2 Market Limiters 232
12.5 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 233
MIS SURGERY INSTRUMENTATION MARKET 236
13.1 INTRODUCTION 236
13.2 MARKET ANALYSIS AND FORECAST 238
13.3 DRIVERS AND LIMITERS 240
13.3.1 Market Drivers 240
13.3.2 Market Limiters 241
13.4 COMPETITIVE MARKET SHARE ANALYSIS 242
ABBREVIATIONS 245
For a Full Chart List, please Contact iData LIST OF CHARTS
Chart 1 1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, Australia, 2021 – 2028 3
Chart 1 2: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Overview, Australia, 2021 & 2028 3
Chart 2 1: Multi-Scenario Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Forecast, Australia, 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 32
Chart 5 1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, Australia, 2018 – 2028 93
Chart 5 2: Leading Competitors, Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, Australia, 2021 103
Chart 6 1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Procedures by Segment, Australia, 2018 – 2028 133
Chart 7 1: MIS Interbody Device Market by Segment, Australia, 2018 – 2028 158
Chart 7 2: Leading Competitors, MIS Interbody Device Market, Australia, 2021 173
Chart 8 1: MIS Pedicle Screw Market by Segment, Australia, 2018 – 2028 179
Chart 8 2: Leading Competitors, MIS Pedicle Screw Market, Australia, 2021 194
Chart 9 1: Spinous Process Fixation Market, Australia, 2018 – 2028 198
Chart 9 2: Leading Competitors, Spinous Process Fixation Market, Australia, 2021 204
Chart 10 1: Facet Fixation Market, Australia, 2018 – 2028 208
Chart 10 2: Leading Competitors, Facet Fixation Market, Australia, 2021 213
Chart 11 1: MIS SI Joint Fusion Market, Australia, 2018 – 2028 218
Chart 11 2: Leading Competitors, MIS SI Joint Fusion Market, Australia, 2021 223
Chart 12 1: Spine Endoscope Market by Segment, Australia, 2018 – 2028 227
Chart 12 2: Leading Competitors, Spine Endoscope Market, Australia, 2021 235
Chart 13 1: MIS Surgery Instrumentation Market, Australia, 2018 – 2028 239
 
For a Full Figure List, please Contact iData
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1 1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market Share Ranking by Segment, Australia, 2021 4
Figure 1 2: Companies Researched in this Report 5
Figure 1 3: Factors Impacting the Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, Australia (1 of 2) 6
Figure 1 4: Factors Impacting the Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, Australia (2 of 2) 7
Figure 1 5: Recent Events in the Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, Australia, 2018 – 2021 (1 of 2) 8
Figure 1 6: Recent Events in the Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, Australia, 2018 – 2021 (2 of 2) 9
Figure 1 7: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Procedures Covered 10
Figure 1 8: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Markets Covered 11
Figure 1 9: Key Report Updates 12
Figure 1 10: Version History 12
Figure 2 1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, Worst Case Scenario, Australia, 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 29
Figure 2 2: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, Base Case Scenario, Australia, 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 30
Figure 2 3: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, Best Case Scenario, Australia, 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 31
Figure 4 1: Cervical Fixation Devices by Company (1 of 2) 42
Figure 4 2: Cervical Fixation Devices by Company (2 of 2) 43
Figure 4 3: Facet Fixation Devices by Company 45
Figure 4 4: Interbody Devices by Company (1 of 3) 50
Figure 4 5: Interbody Devices by Company (2 of 3) 51
Figure 4 6: Interbody Devices by Company (3 of 3) 52
Figure 4 7: MIS Sacroiliac Joint Devices by Company 54
Figure 4 8: Cervical Artificial Disc Devices by Company 57
Figure 4 9: Lumbar Artificial Disc Devices by Company 57
Figure 4 10: Dynamic Posterior Stabilization Devices by Company 58
Figure 4 11: Interspinous Process Decompression Devices by Company 58
Figure 4 12: Spinous Process Fixation Devices by Company 60
Figure 4 13: Spinal Electrical Stimulation Devices by Company 62
Figure 4 14: Spine Endoscopes by Company 64
Figure 4 15: Thoracolumbar Fixation Devices by Company (1 of 3) 66
Figure 4 16: Thoracolumbar Fixation Devices by Company (2 of 3) 67
Figure 4 17: Thoracolumbar Fixation Devices by Company (3 of 3) 68
Figure 4 18: Vertebral Compression Fracture Devices by Company 71
Figure 4 19: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic Prestige LP(TM) Cervical Disc System with Streamlined Instruments, DRILL GUIDES 72
Figure 4 20: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic ZEVO(TM) Anterior Cervical Plate System SLOT SCREW 72
Figure 4 21: Class 2 Device Recall Vectris Trial Screening Lead Kit for Spinal Cord Stimulation 72
Figure 4 22: Class 2 Device Recall Vectris Trial Screening Lead Kit for Spinal Cord Stimulation 73
Figure 4 23: Class 2 Device Recall Medtronic CD HORIZON Spinal System MULTIAXIAL SCREW FOR 5.5/6.0MM RODS 73
Figure 4 24: Class 2 Device Recall VerteLP Instrument Kit 73
Figure 4 25: Class 2 Device Recall The MobiC Cervical Disc Prosthesis (MobiC; MobiC 14mm Distraction Screw 74
Figure 4 26: Class 2 Device Recall Lineum OCT Spine System 74
Figure 4 27: Class 2 Device Recall ROSA 1.0.2 (Spine application) 74
Figure 4 28: Class 2 Device Recall Polaris 5.5 Spinal System and Polaris 5.5/Cypher Spinal System 75
Figure 4 29: Class 2 Device Recall Vital MIS Spinal Fixation system 75
Figure 4 30: Class 2 Device Recall Lineum OCT Spine System 75
Figure 4 31: Class 2 Device Recall Zimmer Biomet Vitality Spinal Fixation System 76
Figure 4 32: Class 1 Device Recall SpF PLUSMini (60 A/W) Implantable Spinal Fusion Stimulator 76
Figure 4 33: Comparison of Short Segment Mono-axial and Poly-axial Pedicle Screw Fixation for Thoracolumbar Fractures 77
Figure 4 34: Prospective Study of Fusion Rates Using Spira-C Device for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Surgery (ACDF) 78
Figure 4 35: Bio2 Vitrium® Cervical Cage in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion 78
Figure 4 36: SPIRA™-A 3D and HCT/p DBM vs. Medtronic Divergent™-L/Perimeter™ and Recombinant BMP-2 79
Figure 4 37: Retro-prospective Clinical Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of the Stand-alone Cervical Interbody Cage C-CURVE (Peek and Titanium) Manufactured by MEDICREA® (C-CURVE) 79
Figure 4 38: Percutaneous Screw Fixation vs. Open Fixation in the Treatment of Thoracolumbar Fractures (PrecScrew) 80
Figure 4 39: Clinical Outcome of Implant Removal Versus Retention After Posterior Fixation of Thoracolumbar Fractures 81
Figure 4 40: Early Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Versus Standard Conservative Treatment in Thoracolumbar Vertebral Fractures (AGIL11) 81
Figure 4 41: Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Using Rotary Cutter for Bone Metastases 82
Figure 5 1: Currency Exchange Rate, 2021 89
Figure 5 2: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, Australia, 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 91
Figure 5 3: Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market by Segment, Australia, 2018 – 2028 (AU$M) 92
Figure 5 4: Leading Competitors, Minimally Invasive Spinal Implant Market, Australia, 2021 102
Figure 5 5: SWOT Analysis, DePuy Synthes 119
Figure 5 6: SWOT Analysis, Globus Medical 120
Figure 5 7: SWOT Analysis, Joimax 121
Figure 5 8: SWOT Analysis, Medtronic 122
Figure 5 9: SWOT Analysis, NuVasive (1 of 2) 123
Figure 5 10: SWOT Analysis, NuVasive (2 of 2) 124
Figure 5 11: SWOT Analysis, SI-BONE 125
Figure 5 12: SWOT Analysis, Stryker (1 of 2) 126
Figure 5 13: SWOT Analysis, Stryker (2 of 2) 127
Figure 5 14: SWOT Analysis, VGI Medical 128
Figure 5 15: SWOT Analysis, Zimmer Biomet 129
Figure 6 1: Minimally Invasive Spinal Procedures by Segment, Australia, 2018 – 2028 132
Figure 6 2: MIS Interbody Device Procedures by Segment, Australia, 2018 – 2028 135
Figure 6 3: Total Levels Treated, MIS Interbody Device, Australia, 2018 – 2028 136
Figure 6 4: Total MIS Interbody Device Procedures, Australia, 2018 – 2028 137
Figure 6 5: MIPLIF Procedures, Australia, 2018 – 2028 138
Figure 6 6: MITLIF Procedures, Australia, 2018 – 2028 139
Figure 6 7: LLIF Procedures, Australia, 2018 – 2028 140
Figure 6 8: OLIF Procedures, Australia, 2018 – 2028 141
Figure 6 9: MIS Pedicle Screw Procedures by Segment, Australia, 2018 – 2028 142
Figure 6 10: Total Levels Treated, MIS Pedicle Screw, Australia, 2018 – 2028 143
Figure 6 11: Total MIS Pedicle Screw Procedures, Australia, 2018 – 2028 144
Figure 6 12: Percutaneous Cannulated Pedicle Screw Procedures, Australia, 2018 – 2028 145
Figure 6 13: Retractor Cannulated Pedicle Screw Procedures, Australia, 2018 – 2028 146
Figure 6 14: Retractor Non-Cannulated Pedicle Screw Procedures, Australia, 2018 – 2028 147
Figure 6 15: Spinous Process Fixation Procedures, Australia, 2018 – 2028 148
Figure 6 16: Facet Fixation Procedures, Australia, 2018 – 2028 149
Figure 6 17: MIS Sacroiliac Joint Fusion Procedures, Australia, 2018 – 2028 150
Figure 6 18: Spine Endoscope Procedures, Australia, 2018 – 2028 151
Figure 7 1: MIS Interbody Device Market by Segment, Australia, 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 157
Figure 7 2: MIS Interbody Device Market by Segment, Australia, 2018 – 2028 (AU$M) 157
Figure 7 3: MIS Interbody Device Market, Australia, 2018 – 2028 159
Figure 7 4: MIPLIF Market, Australia, 2018 – 2028 161
Figure 7 5: MITLIF Market, Australia, 2018 – 2028 163
Figure 7 6: LLIF Market, Australia, 2018 – 2028 165
Figure 7 7: OLIF Market, Australia, 2018 – 2028 167
Figure 7 8: Leading Competitors, MIS Interbody Device Market, Australia, 2021 172
Figure 8 1: MIS Pedicle Screw Market by Segment, Australia, 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 177
Figure 8 2: MIS Pedicle Screw Market by Segment, Australia, 2018 – 2028 (AU$M) 178
Figure 8 3: MIS Pedicle Screw Market, Australia, 2018 – 2028 181
Figure 8 4: Percutaneous Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market, Australia, 2018 – 2028 183
Figure 8 5: Retractor Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market, Australia, 2018 – 2028 185
Figure 8 6: Retractor Non-Cannulated Pedicle Screw Market, Australia, 2018 – 2028 187
Figure 8 7: Leading Competitors, MIS Pedicle Screw Market, Australia, 2021 193
Figure 9 1: Spinous Process Fixation Market, Australia, 2018 – 2028 197
Figure 9 2: Leading Competitors, Spinous Process Fixation Market, Australia, 2021 203
Figure 10 1: Facet Fixation Market, Australia, 2018 – 2028 207
Figure 10 2: Leading Competitors, Facet Fixation Market, Australia, 2021 212
Figure 11 1: MIS SI Joint Fusion Market, Australia, 2018 – 2028 217
Figure 11 2: Leading Competitors, MIS SI Joint Fusion Market, Australia, 2021 222
Figure 12 1: Spine Endoscope Market by Segment, Australia, 2018 – 2028 (US$M) 225
Figure 12 2: Spine Endoscope Market by Segment, Australia, 2018 – 2028 (AU$M) 226
Figure 12 3: Spine Endoscope Market, Australia, 2018 – 2028 228
Figure 12 4: Instrumentation Market, Australia, 2018 – 2028 230
Figure 12 5: Leading Competitors, Spine Endoscope Market, Australia, 2021 234
Figure 13 1: MIS Surgery Instrumentation Market, Australia, 2018 – 2028 238
Figure 13 2: Leading Competitors, MIS Surgery Instrumentation Market, Australia, 2021 244

iData’s 9-Step Research Methodology

Our reports follow an in-depth 9-step methodology which focuses on the following research systems:

  • Original primary research that consists of the most up-to-date market data
  • Strong foundation of quantitative and qualitative research
  • Focused on the needs and strategic challenges of the industry participants

Step 1: Project Initiation & Team Selection During this preliminary investigation, all staff members involved in the industry discusses the topic in detail.

Step 2: Prepare Data Systems and Perform Secondary Research The first task of the research team is to prepare for the data collection process: Filing systems and relational databases are developed as needed.

Step 3: Preparation for Interviews & Questionnaire Design The core of all iData research reports is primary market research. Interviews with industry insiders represent the single most reliable way to obtain accurate, current data about market conditions, trends, threats and opportunities.

Step 4: Performing Primary Research At this stage, interviews are performed using contacts and information acquired in the secondary research phase.

Step 5: Research Analysis: Establishing Baseline Estimates Following the completion of the primary research phase, the collected information must be synthesized into an accurate view of the market status. The most important question is the current state of the market.

Step 6: Market Forecast and Analysis iData Research uses a proprietary method to combine statistical data and opinions of industry experts to forecast future market values.

Step 7: Identify Strategic Opportunities iData analysts identify in broad terms why some companies are gaining or losing share within a given market segment.

Step 8: Final Review and Market Release An integral part of the iData research methodology is a built-in philosophy of quality control and continuing improvement is integral to the iData philosophy.

Step 9: Customer Feedback and Market Monitoring iData philosophy of continuous improvement requires that reports and consulting projects be monitored after release for customer feedback and market accuracy.

Click Here to Read More About Our Methodology